Its just who ends up with the most points....games played or not...it doesnt matter...it is gonna be a close one!!HolyRider wrote:I just saw that Lichfield dropped to third in total points but he has also played three less games. Does that get taken into account or will everyone end up playing the same number of games in the end?
STATE Point Leaders
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:01 pm
i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
This is the regular season points...not post or pre season....all teams get a regular season..not all teams get a post...so it would make sense to stop it before sections....then a seperate one for after...GinosAreGood wrote:i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference
Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.GinosAreGood wrote:i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference

The DEMON
-
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Fri Oct 05, 2007 5:28 pm
well PAL... obviously anything can happen. i'm pointing out if they maintain the scoring pace they're on vs the kind of competition they have left, litchfield is in the best position to win the title. it's not like i'm rooting for the kid. lourdes needs to beat west to get the #1 seed in section 1A. to do that they'll need to shut down the litchfield/leivermann line as much as possible. as far as the level of competition. none of the 3 play as many tough teams as brown from rosemount or johnson from denfeld does. that's the breaks. you play the teams that are on your schedule. doesn't mean they aren't still skilled players.SiouxRecruit wrote:YEA IF...that happens....it goes both ways there slick.... :P..EaglehockeyI wrote:litchfield will win it. he's only 1 pt. behind lehrke and hanowski with 3 fewer games played. he's got 9 games left. of the 9, 5 are against m.east, austin, winona, faribault, and roch. jm. in the previous games against 4 of those teams he got 22 pts. he's bound to score multiple pts against jm and at least a couple of the harder teams they have left. he should end up between 95-100 pts. lehrke and hanowski would have to avg. over 6 pts per game the rest of the season to beat him.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
If litchfield not a good player?....did he play elites or anything?...i honestly dont know..is he a d1 prospect?darkdemon wrote:No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.GinosAreGood wrote:i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference
Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:00 am
He verbally commited to Mankato State about a month or so agoSiouxRecruit wrote:If litchfield not a good player?....did he play elites or anything?...i honestly dont know..is he a d1 prospect?darkdemon wrote:No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.GinosAreGood wrote:i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
darkdemon wrote:No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.GinosAreGood wrote:i believe there is a 25 game regular season limit. unfortunatly for litchfield, west doesn't have 25 games, they lost a game somewhere between this and last season. I'm not sure if the post season technically counts toward the scoring title, but if it did, obviously whoever makes it furthest into sections/state will probably win since it's so close and one more game might make the difference
so this guy is an idiot?...hes gonna play in the WCHA and he says its only because of his schedule....some people crack me up....someone HAS to play the weaker teams....its a fact of life (hockey).....it just happens to be that there are some exceptional players on those teams.....

Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
-
- Posts: 479
- Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 4:35 pm
sinbombyzermancurve wrote:He verbally commited to Mankato State about a month or so agoSiouxRecruit wrote:If litchfield not a good player?....did he play elites or anything?...i honestly dont know..is he a d1 prospect?darkdemon wrote: No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.
I know that Leivermann committed to Mankato State, but Litchfield did too? That would be cool if they are teamates again in the future.
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:21 am
-
- Posts: 212
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:00 am
sinbombyzermancurve wrote:My fault on this one...i thought the post was about lieverman but it was about litchfield.....he is not commited to the Mavericks....but Lieverman is.SiouxRecruit wrote:If litchfield not a good player?....did he play elites or anything?...i honestly dont know..is he a d1 prospect?darkdemon wrote: No more excuses the only reason Litchfield would win the scoring title is he plays in a weak section and against weak opponents. Except for a certain few teams.
He verbally commited to Mankato State about a month or so ago
Agreed, I think it would be hard for anyone to say that you arent a "skilled" or good player if youre anywhere on the list of prospects for the point title. If they do (as we already see someone with envy has) they are pretty much blowing smoke. The title only means that you accumulated the most points. Something you do by being a good player. If you want to argue about who the best player in the state is, go to that post.EaglehockeyI wrote:well PAL... obviously anything can happen. i'm pointing out if they maintain the scoring pace they're on vs the kind of competition they have left, litchfield is in the best position to win the title. it's not like i'm rooting for the kid. lourdes needs to beat west to get the #1 seed in section 1A. to do that they'll need to shut down the litchfield/leivermann line as much as possible. as far as the level of competition. none of the 3 play as many tough teams as brown from rosemount or johnson from denfeld does. that's the breaks. you play the teams that are on your schedule. doesn't mean they aren't still skilled players.SiouxRecruit wrote:YEA IF...that happens....it goes both ways there slick....EaglehockeyI wrote:litchfield will win it. he's only 1 pt. behind lehrke and hanowski with 3 fewer games played. he's got 9 games left. of the 9, 5 are against m.east, austin, winona, faribault, and roch. jm. in the previous games against 4 of those teams he got 22 pts. he's bound to score multiple pts against jm and at least a couple of the harder teams they have left. he should end up between 95-100 pts. lehrke and hanowski would have to avg. over 6 pts per game the rest of the season to beat him...
-
- Posts: 411
- Joined: Tue Dec 12, 2006 10:18 pm
-
- Posts: 63
- Joined: Fri Nov 30, 2007 2:21 am
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:32 pm
once dave meyer gets back from back surgery (from carrying the team on his back) he will snipe bar down top PLEASE BAN ME all day and easily take the title.
everytime he gets on the ice the point keepers tally a point to save themselves time for when he does a backhand tole pole behind the back to himself and goes bar down twice on an empty net
everytime he gets on the ice the point keepers tally a point to save themselves time for when he does a backhand tole pole behind the back to himself and goes bar down twice on an empty net
Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
-
- Posts: 130
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 5:12 am
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
Well...im off by one point right now...guessed right with 6 on morris and off by one vs TRF...SiouxRecruit wrote:Zach Lehrke- Park Rapids (82) next games vs.
Morris/Benson (144)
Thief River Falls (70)
Detroit Lakes (117)
Red Lake Falls (134)
6 pts vs Morris
2 pts vs TRF
3 pts vs DL
4 pts vs RLF
15 points Total
Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
-
- Posts: 76
- Joined: Wed Dec 12, 2007 12:25 am
If comparing the Lake conference to the Big Nine makes you feel good have at it but I don't think you need to have so much envy when Rosemount is doing so well. The Big Nine is actually very strong on the top end this year (for the Big Nine.) Enlighten us on why you think the Big Nine is so "down"greenline wrote:Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
By the way, it used to be Mankato State and to most people it will always be Mankato State. It sounds alot better that Minnesota State Mankato.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact:
So this is the point leaders thread.....this may belong in another thread...start it up...TheCaptain wrote:If comparing the Lake conference to the Big Nine makes you feel good have at it but I don't think you need to have so much envy when Rosemount is doing so well. The Big Nine is actually very strong on the top end this year (for the Big Nine.) Enlighten us on why you think the Big Nine is so "down"greenline wrote:Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
By the way, it used to be Mankato State and to most people it will always be Mankato State. It sounds alot better that Minnesota State Mankato.
Catch me On YouTube @ FishOnLuke
That in no way was a shot at Rosemount. I am saying JT Brown is a much better player if he can score that many points against legitimate teams. The Big 9 is way down because the 3 Rochester teams who are usually the best are not even better than Owatonna. Austin has 0 wins, and has a chance to beat Mankato East who is just as bad. This is the worst the Big 9 has been in a long time. And they are not "Very strong" at the the top. Having Century take 3rd in the state last year is very strong.TheCaptain wrote:If comparing the Lake conference to the Big Nine makes you feel good have at it but I don't think you need to have so much envy when Rosemount is doing so well. The Big Nine is actually very strong on the top end this year (for the Big Nine.) Enlighten us on why you think the Big Nine is so "down"greenline wrote:Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
By the way, it used to be Mankato State and to most people it will always be Mankato State. It sounds alot better that Minnesota State Mankato.
150 points would be amazing for anyone, in fact I believe the state record is only 111 so I would say you are playing up JT Brown for some reason or another. I don't even see him taking the title let alone breaking any recordsgreenline wrote:Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
-
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 4:01 pm
First off, i understand 150 pts was an exaggeration, but Are southern minnesota defensemen along with the big 9 all of a sudden cones? It's not like Brown would walk all five players and score every shift. Just cuz he plays harder competition doesn't put him on a pedistal. If you're one of the top point leaders in the state, you have to be good. It's not like anyone can just score whenever the want. Let's no keep bashing other people's schedules. This is about who will win the state scoring title. Rigth now i have to agree with Eaglehockey, that it'll probably be Litchfield with Leivermann coming back, or Beau hanowski with Ben coming back from injury also to give a boost.HolyRider wrote:150 points would be amazing for anyone, in fact I believe the state record is only 111 so I would say you are playing up JT Brown for some reason or another. I don't even see him taking the title let alone breaking any recordsgreenline wrote:Mankato West has a terrible schedule. I think JT Brown would have 150 points already if he played on the same line as Lievermann in the Big 9. The big 9 is way way down this year. And why do people say Mankato State? It's Minnesota State Mankato. Must be the people from the Farming area of the state. Mankato State? That doesn't make sense at all.
Last edited by GinosAreGood on Sat Jan 26, 2008 1:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1140
- Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:14 pm
- Location: Jordan, MN
- Contact: