TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

hunter
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:48 am

TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Post by hunter »

After 19 games: The 135 teams listed in MAX PREPS

HM 1st place Goals 134
HM 1st " Assists 222
HM 1st " Points 356
HM 38th " Minutes played 969
RE: running time
HM 5th " Goals Against 28
HM 2nd " Goals Against Average 1.278
HM 79th " Saves 337
HM 1st " Shut Outs 5

HM 134 Goals on 745 shots or 18%
Opponents 29 Goals on 363 shots or 8%

HM 31 Power Play Goals on 93 trys or 33%
Opponents 7 Power Play Goals on 81 trys or 8%
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Re: TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Post by BIAFP »

hunter wrote:After 19 games: The 135 teams listed in MAX PREPS

HM 1st place Goals 134
HM 1st " Assists 222
HM 1st " Points 356
HM 38th " Minutes played 969
RE: running time
HM 5th " Goals Against 28
HM 2nd " Goals Against Average 1.278
HM 79th " Saves 337
HM 1st " Shut Outs 5

HM 134 Goals on 745 shots or 18%
Opponents 29 Goals on 363 shots or 8%

HM 31 Power Play Goals on 93 trys or 33%
Opponents 7 Power Play Goals on 81 trys or 8%




NICE SCHEDULE :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Re: TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Post by Sparlimb »

hunter wrote:After 19 games: The 135 teams listed in MAX PREPS

HM 1st place Goals 134
HM 1st " Assists 222
HM 1st " Points 356
HM 38th " Minutes played 969
RE: running time
HM 5th " Goals Against 28
HM 2nd " Goals Against Average 1.278
HM 79th " Saves 337
HM 1st " Shut Outs 5

HM 134 Goals on 745 shots or 18%
Opponents 29 Goals on 363 shots or 8%

HM 31 Power Play Goals on 93 trys or 33%
Opponents 7 Power Play Goals on 81 trys or 8%

Doesn't mean squat if the team doesn't learn to show up in big games. The team two years ago had as good if not better stats and that earned a 4th place finish. Flip better learn to be a big game goalie real dang soon or it will just be a repeat of the last two years...
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP »

Too bad Austin couldn't fit the Peoneers in on their schedule this year. :roll:
hunter
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:48 am

Post by hunter »

It only means what it states
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP »

hunter wrote:It only means what it states
That they will be two and home at state again?
Zeke16
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Nov 10, 2006 2:42 pm

Post by Zeke16 »

"At State" is the key term
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP »

16 year old Zeke wrote:"At State" is the key term

If just getting out of the 2nd weakest section in the State is a goal.....then so be it :roll:
SECHockeyFan
Posts: 161
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:16 pm

Post by SECHockeyFan »

BIAFP wrote:
16 year old Zeke wrote:"At State" is the key term

If just getting out of the 2nd weakest section in the State is a goal.....then so be it :roll:
4AA is not the second weakest section. It is obviously stronger than 1AA, and is no worse 3AA, 5AA, or even 8AA (2 good teams, the rest average). 4AA is year-in and year-out one of the tougher sections to get out of.
parrish4president
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 1:55 pm

Re: TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Post by parrish4president »

hunter wrote:After 19 games: The 135 teams listed in MAX PREPS

HM 1st place Goals 134
HM 1st " Assists 222
HM 1st " Points 356
HM 38th " Minutes played 969
RE: running time
HM 5th " Goals Against 28
HM 2nd " Goals Against Average 1.278
HM 79th " Saves 337
HM 1st " Shut Outs 5

HM 134 Goals on 745 shots or 18%
Opponents 29 Goals on 363 shots or 8%

HM 31 Power Play Goals on 93 trys or 33%
Opponents 7 Power Play Goals on 81 trys or 8%
dont get me wrong, Hill is a pretty good team, but those states dont mean anything. They have a pathetically easy schedule which severely inflates those stats. The only thing easier than their schedule is their section. At state they should get a real team to play against and they will flop because they season didnt prepare them.
hunter
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:48 am

Post by hunter »

Any hockey comments coming out of Erskine, Mn are a real Joke.
rams80
Posts: 108
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 12:52 pm

Post by rams80 »

BIAFP wrote:Too bad Austin couldn't fit the Peoneers in on their schedule this year. :roll:

I heard they tried really hard to schedule Austin this year.
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Sparlimb the Wise knows his stuff.

He knows that if ANY Hill player is concerned about stats they are doomed.

Without Flips best, they probably still will make it to St. Paul.

Without Flips best, you can hang another "appearance" banner.
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

rams80 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:Too bad Austin couldn't fit the Peoneers in on their schedule this year. :roll:

I heard they tried really hard to schedule Austin this year.
Was that really posted by a Rams fan? :roll: :?: :?: :?:
sicknasty7722
Posts: 225
Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 10:21 pm

Post by sicknasty7722 »

I have not been keeping up with this site entirely lately, so can someone confirm that HM senior forward Andy Singerhouse committed to UND? Or is that just a rumor?
BIAFP
Posts: 1825
Joined: Thu Feb 13, 2003 3:44 pm

Post by BIAFP »

who_b_dat wrote:
rams80 wrote:
BIAFP wrote:Too bad Austin couldn't fit the Peoneers in on their schedule this year. :roll:

I heard they tried really hard to schedule Austin this year.
Was that really posted by a Rams fan? :roll: :?: :?: :?:

Sad but true...........rack em up!
who_b_dat
Posts: 795
Joined: Mon Jan 08, 2007 6:55 pm

Post by who_b_dat »

sicknasty7722 wrote:I have not been keeping up with this site entirely lately, so can someone confirm that HM senior forward Andy Singerhouse committed to UND? Or is that just a rumor?
Would be shocking news to me if true. I think someone's pulling your leg.
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

BIAFP wrote:Too bad Austin couldn't fit the Peoneers in on their schedule this year. :roll:
Hill tried to get Austin, but wound up with the Spuds instead...basically, no difference. We can't choose what section we are in, but if we could, we would love to be in 7AA given what we did to East earlier. Will they really be the top seed there?? Please MSHSL league put us there. :wink:
hunter
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:48 am

Post by hunter »

MINNESOTA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS (STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE)
Go to link http://www.minnhock.com/strength.htm
# 1 Wayzata HM won 5-0
# 3 Minnetonka HM lost 1-4
# 4 Duluth East HM won 5-1
# 9 White Bear HM won 6-3
# 24 St. Thomas HM won 4-2

JUST THE FACTS, MAN JUST THE FACTS
pioneers
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: St Paul

Post by pioneers »

sicknasty7722 wrote:I have not been keeping up with this site entirely lately, so can someone confirm that HM senior forward Andy Singerhouse committed to UND? Or is that just a rumor?
According to this site, he is headed to Wisconsin
http://wihockeyd1watch.blogspot.com/
hunter
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed May 17, 2006 11:48 am

Post by hunter »

That list is just a Wisconsin Players to Watch List. He is not commited anywhere yet. The coach from Princeton was at last nights game scouting Andy.
whitebearsuperfanB
Posts: 106
Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 3:47 pm

Re: TOP OF THE HILL-----Murray

Post by whitebearsuperfanB »

parrish4president wrote:
hunter wrote:After 19 games: The 135 teams listed in MAX PREPS

HM 1st place Goals 134
HM 1st " Assists 222
HM 1st " Points 356
HM 38th " Minutes played 969
RE: running time
HM 5th " Goals Against 28
HM 2nd " Goals Against Average 1.278
HM 79th " Saves 337
HM 1st " Shut Outs 5

HM 134 Goals on 745 shots or 18%
Opponents 29 Goals on 363 shots or 8%

HM 31 Power Play Goals on 93 trys or 33%
Opponents 7 Power Play Goals on 81 trys or 8%
dont get me wrong, Hill is a pretty good team, but those states dont mean anything. They have a pathetically easy schedule which severely inflates those stats. The only thing easier than their schedule is their section. At state they should get a real team to play against and they will flop because they season didnt prepare them.
According to PS2

RANK SECTION AVG RANK
1 4AA 17.73
2 5AA 17.52
3 7AA 17.38
4 6AA 17.27
5 3AA 17.09
6 2AA 16.65
7 8AA 15.23
8 1AA 15.03

Schedule is almost emberassingly easy but calling there section easy kind of makes me laugh. Anytime White Bear and Hill have to play its never easy.
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

Go Hill

Post by O-townClown »

Hunter, those are impressive. That said, if you don't recognize that the schedule they face is pretty weak you are blind. Or stupid.

Wayzata has played the toughest schedule, but they LOST all their games.

How did Hill do against good teams like Minnetonka?

I think Hill-Murray is one of the state's Top 5 teams. I wouldn't be alarmed if they won state. However, their stats are padded by ringing up 10 goals against teams like North and Sibley. OF COURSE their numbers look good.

I'm sure the kids at Edina didn't know what to do when they got to play Cretin. 9-0 stands out like a sore thumb on their schedule. When Hill beats someone like they stole something all anyone can say is, "another."
Be kind. Rewind.
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

laughable

Post by O-townClown »

hunter wrote:MINNESOTA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS (STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE)
Go to link http://www.minnhock.com/strength.htm


JUST THE FACTS, MAN JUST THE FACTS
The fact is that Hill-Murray has played the state's 27th most difficult schedule. For a perennial power, this is hardly killing it. What's the goal at Hill? Run up scoring records or beat quality opponents? Let us know how the next NSP game goes.
Be kind. Rewind.
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Re: laughable

Post by Sparlimb »

O-townClown wrote:
hunter wrote:MINNESOTA HIGH SCHOOL BOYS (STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE)
Go to link http://www.minnhock.com/strength.htm


JUST THE FACTS, MAN JUST THE FACTS
The fact is that Hill-Murray has played the state's 27th most difficult schedule. For a perennial power, this is hardly killing it. What's the goal at Hill? Run up scoring records or beat quality opponents? Let us know how the next NSP game goes.
We've had this argument enough. Hill is in the right conference for every other sport. They can't help that their hockey team is on another level then the rest of the teams or that their conference is generally weak in hockey other then the top 3 teams. Hill plays as hard a non-conference schedule as anyone, so you can't really bash them. That's all they can do. Truth is this conference provides a bigger challenge then the St. Paul City Conference did during the 80's. You want to see some amazing numbers, look at those games...
Post Reply