Bantam A Upsets

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

fireinthehole
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:35 pm

Post by fireinthehole »

oh, why didnt you say so. U out shot them 44-25, so if you were in football game it would be a blow out.

It doesnt matter if you out shot them 144- 25. final 4-1. Last time i checked if you were behind after 3 periods that meant you loss........ I could be wrong though.
niceice909
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:12 pm

Post by niceice909 »

okay eagle we all no your from new ulm so stop talking up your team just by guessing from your name your #11 i would know you name but it does not have your #'s on you roster (new ulm eagles...)
by the way you can have 44 shots but maybe 14 are good shots the rest are probely dump ins and little tricklers
eagle11
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:06 pm

Post by eagle11 »

actualy we had a lot of chances, there goalie was just good. and i am not 11 by the way..old number
jancze5
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:11 pm

laughable

Post by jancze5 »

Eagle11...honestly, that's a laughable accountability of the game.
So shots 20-2 in the second...final shots were 44 to 25...so in the 1st and 3rd period the shots were 24-23 and the Fire were up 3 zip with 4 min's or so in the game when you finally got one past mcnasty in net...and you account for that as game domination...LOL, seriously dude, your team is a solid Bantam A team with an excellent 1st line and a nice goaltender..take the compliment and good luck the rest of the way and in Districts.
New England Prep School Hockey Recruiter
DaSTeK
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:08 pm

Post by DaSTeK »

Why dont you guys just stop being such PLEASE BAN ME? he's merely stating a fact,

they outshot them 44-20.! and they lost 3-1 (ENG).

it happens to all of us! Of course its not an excuse! he doesnt mean "oh we really actually beat them in my mind."

you guys harass everyone who says something about themselves on this forums.
ehockey#1
Posts: 6
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 4:57 pm

Post by ehockey#1 »

Why dont you guys just stop being such PLEASE BAN ME? he's merely stating a fact,

they outshot them 44-20.! and they lost 3-1 (ENG).

it happens to all of us! Of course its not an excuse! he doesnt mean "oh we really actually beat them in my mind."

you guys harass everyone who says something about themselves on this forums. THATS TRUE!!!

Actually I was watching this game and the Rochester-n. st. paul game and when i saw new ulm they were not dominating them but controlling the game. Fires goalie was on fire and sometimes lucky.
dangla.
Posts: 302
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:42 pm

Post by dangla. »

I never knew you won games on shots on goals. :roll:
eagle11
Posts: 46
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2007 2:06 pm

Post by eagle11 »

i never said that i just said new ulm out played the fire
justanobserver
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 pm

rematch-bragging rights

Post by justanobserver »

Eagle/New Ulm Bantam A player:

Settle this dispute like real men and have your manager call the 94 Fire up for another game.....before the end on the season..... a rematch. I have never heard of the Fire Hockey Club backing down or hiding from a worthy opponent!! It is not in their blood. Take notes District 2 and Eagan.
DaSTeK
Posts: 59
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 5:08 pm

Post by DaSTeK »

you guys arent getting my point. Its opinionated. Dont settle it like "real men" Act like "real men".
justanobserver
Posts: 44
Joined: Mon May 22, 2006 2:23 pm

Post by justanobserver »

You want to be acknowledged and you point noted.......OK done. Enjoy your hot cup of coffee on this cold day. Move on to more Bantam A upsets.
Tartan#10
Posts: 5
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 4:03 pm

Post by Tartan#10 »

Tartan killed stillwater 7-3 right after stillwater beat tartan in alexandria 4-1
dangleallday16
Posts: 36
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 10:10 pm

Re: laughable

Post by dangleallday16 »

jancze5 wrote:Eagle11...honestly, that's a laughable accountability of the game.
So shots 20-2 in the second...final shots were 44 to 25...so in the 1st and 3rd period the shots were 24-23 and the Fire were up 3 zip with 4 min's or so in the game when you finally got one past mcnasty in net...and you account for that as game domination...LOL, seriously dude, your team is a solid Bantam A team with an excellent 1st line and a nice goaltender..take the compliment and good luck the rest of the way and in Districts.

New Ulm won district 4 Bantam A's.
cajones18
Posts: 152
Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2008 2:43 pm

Post by cajones18 »

IR District Semi-Finals
I Falls-3
Grand Rapids-2 (OT)
PRIVATE SCHOOLS RECRUIT!!
BantamAhockey1
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:56 pm

Post by BantamAhockey1 »

hermantown 3 gr 2
clickclick
Posts: 57
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 7:17 pm

Post by clickclick »

Talk about upsets, the 94 Fire team beat the #5 team in the state...Minnetonka. They beat them 4-3, but the Fire shouldve had a couple more. I think 100% of the people watching were almost positive Minnetonka would win.
fireinthehole
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 10:35 pm

Post by fireinthehole »

Osseo 3-2 over Rochester in the East regional tournement
thenumber4
Posts: 24
Joined: Sun Dec 10, 2006 7:35 pm

Post by thenumber4 »

earlier in the season..
Edina 2 EP 0
peskycardinal
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 1:17 pm

Post by peskycardinal »

Why is Edina 2-0 over EP an upset?
ice00breaker
Posts: 317
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2006 3:21 pm

Post by ice00breaker »

Why is Edina 2-0 over EP an upset?
Because EP is clearly better.
Post Reply