Hill Murray @ SSP 1/31

Newguy07 · Post by **Newguy07** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:21 pm

Can anyone tell me what the shots were? Was this an even game? Just looking for a first hand opinion/recap.

Cabela10 · Post by **Cabela10** » Thu Jan 31, 2008 11:40 pm

I was at the game and it was back and forth, it was a fast paced game. The score was 2-0 at one point and SSP tied the game around the 2:30 mark remaining in the third. I know in overtime the shots were 7-1 Hill Murray. I believe the shots were even during regulation.

who_b_dat · Post by **who_b_dat** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:07 am

Cabela10 wrote:Do you guys have anything decent to add to conversations in this forum. Doesn't seem so.

The kid never reported the score, I was just relaying the score to everyone.

And you sir are very kind to have enlightened us all.

That Sparlimb kid sure doesn't add much around here. You, on the other hand, should be commended for all the value you add. I can really tell that you are intelligent and just trying to make the forum a better place. You must be a SSP student? Thanks again. I really enjoy reading your posts. $\:D/$

gopherhockey99 · Post by **gopherhockey99** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 1:56 am

not trying to take anything away from hill, but it has been proven that they are vulnerable losing to tartan and tying ssp. as of right now i would not put them in the elite status with roseau, edina, or minnetonka.

thorhockey · Post by **thorhockey** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 5:59 am

The door opens for sections
Was it the same excuse for the loss against Tartan?
Remind me, I had the same bug and can't remember

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 8:04 am

who_b_dat wrote:
Cabela10 wrote:Do you guys have anything decent to add to conversations in this forum. Doesn't seem so.

The kid never reported the score, I was just relaying the score to everyone.
And you sir are very kind to have enlightened us all. That Sparlimb kid sure doesn't add much around here. You, on the other hand, should be commended for all the value you add. I can really tell that you are intelligent and just trying to make the forum a better place. You must be a SSP student? Thanks again. I really enjoy reading your posts. $\:D/$

I concurr with who...

Rossbury21 · Post by **Rossbury21** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 10:46 am

Didn't think I would miss out on this one did you...........
Firstly, it was a very good game, I was working at the rink, so I saw the whole thing. Shots were 35-23 Hill I believe. So maybe Lech should have practiced with two goalies in the net, because Rothe played like it. I have large doubts that the game would have been this good had the Pioneers stayed out of the box in the final period, I don't think there was much time they didn't have a penalty.

Great game for South St. Paul, not so much for Hill Murray. First a loss to Tartan, now a tie to South St. Paul, it must be an off season.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:16 am

thorhockey wrote:The door opens for sections
Was it the same excuse for the loss against Tartan?
Remind me, I had the same bug and can't remember

The door is always open during sections, but it always seems that Hill closes a lot doors and ends team's seasons.

Did you say "remind me". Ok, 6-0 & running time & Hill never lost to SSP this season...any questions?

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:17 am

Rossbury21 wrote:Didn't think I would miss out on this one did you...........
Firstly, it was a very good game, I was working at the rink, so I saw the whole thing. Shots were 35-23 Hill I believe. So maybe Lech should have practiced with two goalies in the net, because Rothe played like it. I have large doubts that the game would have been this good had the Pioneers stayed out of the box in the final period, I don't think there was much time they didn't have a penalty. Great game for South St. Paul, not so much for Hill Murray. First a loss to Tartan, now a tie to South St. Paul, it must be an off season.

You know that you're amazing when your clear#2 goalie holds Hill to 2 goals on 35 shots. I think we might be witnessing the best goalie tandem in the history of high school hockey.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:21 am

We were glad to get out of there with a tie, had Williamson played nets, there was no way we score & thus no way we manage a tie.

Rossbury21 · Post by **Rossbury21** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:29 am

Pioneerprideguy wrote:We were glad to get out of there with a tie, had Williamson played nets, there was no way we score & thus no way we manage a tie.

Good one

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:44 am

Goldy Gopher wrote:
You know that you're amazing when your clear#2 goalie holds Hill to 2 goals on 35 shots. I think we might be witnessing the best goalie tandem in the history of high school hockey.

He's the best back-up golie since boblee!

Rossbury21 · Post by **Rossbury21** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:47 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
Goldy Gopher wrote:
You know that you're amazing when your clear#2 goalie holds Hill to 2 goals on 35 shots. I think we might be witnessing the best goalie tandem in the history of high school hockey.
He's the best back-up golie since boblee!

Well for the record, there is no back-up, they trade off games. He hasn't been a back up since freshman year.

Goldy Gopher · Post by **Goldy Gopher** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 11:57 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
Goldy Gopher wrote:
You know that you're amazing when your clear#2 goalie holds Hill to 2 goals on 35 shots. I think we might be witnessing the best goalie tandem in the history of high school hockey.
He's the best back-up golie since boblee!

They don't have a starter and a back up, but he's still "# 2"

Sparlimb · Post by **Sparlimb** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 12:53 pm

who_b_dat wrote:
Cabela10 wrote:Do you guys have anything decent to add to conversations in this forum. Doesn't seem so.

The kid never reported the score, I was just relaying the score to everyone.
And you sir are very kind to have enlightened us all. That Sparlimb kid sure doesn't add much around here. You, on the other hand, should be commended for all the value you add. I can really tell that you are intelligent and just trying to make the forum a better place. You must be a SSP student? Thanks again. I really enjoy reading your posts. $\:D/$

I haven't been called a kid in 20 years. Thanks man...

DubCHAGuy · Post by **DubCHAGuy** » Fri Feb 01, 2008 7:21 pm

Newguy07 wrote:Can anyone tell me what the shots were? Was this an even game? Just looking for a first hand opinion/recap.

Hill skated fine, SSP just played really physical, and made them work to get the puck out of the zone. I'd say the SSP defenseman looked better then HM's. Hill took 2-3 stupid retaliation penalties and got too pretty on some odd man rushes. The SSP goalie saw every shot he faced.