Your AA Top 10 as of 2/3/08

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:36 pm

OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial

This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.

So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:39 pm

OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.

So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.

Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx

that's in the top 10??

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:48 pm

HAL ranks Roseau's schedule at #47.

HAL has a chip or 2 loose on occasion but he usually isn't that far off.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:50 pm

packerboy wrote:HAL ranks Roseau's schedule at #47.

HAL has a chip or 2 loose on occasion but he usually isn't that far off.

Well PB... he did say last 5 games, but c'mon that line up isn't gonna be a top 10 for even 5 games. Is it????

packerboy · Post by **packerboy** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:55 pm

There is only one source that I would trust to answer that question, CNT:

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:19 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.

So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.
Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx

that's in the top 10??

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:23 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:1. Edina
2. Minnetonka
3. Anoka
4. Blaine
5. BSM
6. Rosemont
7. HM
8. Roseau
9. Duluth East
10. Centenial
This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.

So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.
Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx

that's in the top 10??

It was found on this forum, scroll down to Minnesota hockey rankings all the info is there.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:30 pm

OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote: This is not my real rankings, it is the top 10 toughest schedules (AA) in the State for the last 5 games.

So maybe, Roseau's schedule isn't as cupcakeish as some would think.
Where did you come up with that?
Tech twice
Brainerd
Warroad and Crx

that's in the top 10??

It was found on this forum, scroll down to Minnesota hockey rankings all the info is there.

Not sure on that...

may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.

Clarification requested from admin please!!!

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:35 pm

Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that... may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.

Clarification requested from admin please!!!

What we got here is... failure to communicate.

Thats last 5 total, not strength.

Can't Never Tried · Post by **Can't Never Tried** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:38 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that... may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.

Clarification requested from admin please!!!
What we got here is... failure to communicate.

Thats last 5 total, not strength.

Close enough to admin for me

OGEE OGELTHORPE · Post by **OGEE OGELTHORPE** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:39 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
Can't Never Tried wrote:
Not sure on that... may have to ask Mitch as it comes off of his system, but I believe that is the performance of the last 5 not strength of last 5.

Clarification requested from admin please!!!
What we got here is... failure to communicate.

Thats last 5 total, not strength.

Thanks for the Claification on that, I graduated from the Marilyn Woodhead sped reading class.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:00 pm

OGEE OGELTHORPE wrote: Thanks for the Claification on that, I graduated from the Marilyn Woodhead sped reading class.

Ben they're, dun that!

I think the last 5 is weighted in the total, so it adds a momentum factor. "Whose Hot".