South St. Paul's Freshman Adam Wilcox

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

packerboy wrote:
Sparlimb wrote: So what you are saying is Cretin needs a goalie...
No, what I am sayin is that SSP is a town with character... and that alot of characters are raised there.

Maplewood? Whats that? Oh yah, they are the ones with the red leaf on the street signs. How interesting.
Maplewood has one thing going for it. It's shape. It is obvvious city planners took the leftovers and called it Maplewood. North St. Paul, on the other hand is more than just a snowman. I grew up knowing North = Good and South = Bad. Granted, North St. Paul holds one record in the state tourney books. Most overtime losses. Sad...Hehe...
Top
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Sparlimb wrote: Maplewood has one thing going for it. It's shape. It is obvvious city planners took the leftovers and called it Maplewood. North St. Paul, on the other hand is more than just a snowman. I grew up knowing North = Good and South = Bad. Granted, North St. Paul holds one record in the state tourney books. Most overtime losses. Sad...Hehe...
Castle Greens and the King Hi.... :D
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
Top
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Post by wbmd »

Neutron 14 wrote:
Sparlimb wrote: Maplewood has one thing going for it. It's shape. It is obvvious city planners took the leftovers and called it Maplewood. North St. Paul, on the other hand is more than just a snowman. I grew up knowing North = Good and South = Bad. Granted, North St. Paul holds one record in the state tourney books. Most overtime losses. Sad...Hehe...
Castle Greens and the King Hi.... :D
Thinking back a long ways I see.
Top
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

wbmd wrote:
Neutron 14 wrote:
Sparlimb wrote: Maplewood has one thing going for it. It's shape. It is obvvious city planners took the leftovers and called it Maplewood. North St. Paul, on the other hand is more than just a snowman. I grew up knowing North = Good and South = Bad. Granted, North St. Paul holds one record in the state tourney books. Most overtime losses. Sad...Hehe...
Castle Greens and the King Hi.... :D
Thinking back a long ways I see.
Its been a long time since I'd be caught dead in NSP!
The only soft spot I see is the one between my legs
Top
eyeinthesky
Posts: 80
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 12:05 pm
Location: the sky

gov

Post by eyeinthesky »

don't forget about pawlenty
THE EYE IN THE SKY DONT LIE THATS FO SHO
Top
packerboy
Posts: 5259
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 11:51 am

Re: gov

Post by packerboy »

eyeinthesky wrote:don't forget about pawlenty
Good one eye. Our Gov is also a proud Packer.
Top
2 for cheating
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:48 pm

Re: gov

Post by 2 for cheating »

packerboy wrote:
eyeinthesky wrote:don't forget about pawlenty
Good one eye. Our Gov is also a proud Packer.
He is? I thought he was a RINO. :wink:
Top
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher »

wbmd wrote:
Rossbury21 wrote:
wbmd wrote: Not attending classes today? :roll:
We have computers at school these days..........with internet.
Then screwing around in school. :roll:
Nothing wrong with screwing around in school. How do you think kids these days make it through?
The U invented swagger.
Top
2 for cheating
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:48 pm

SSP vs Simley

Post by 2 for cheating »

Did the future HOF play this game?

I'm suprised Cabela hasn't had anything to say about this game. 8)
Top
Rossbury21
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:44 am
Location: BSU/Twin Cities

Re: SSP vs Simley

Post by Rossbury21 »

2 for cheating wrote:Did the future HOF play this game?

I'm suprised Cabela hasn't had anything to say about this game. 8)
yeah, he did
Top
Cabela10
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:23 am

Post by Cabela10 »

Wilcox did play this game against Simley but what does that matter. If you weren't there, don't comment. If you didn't see the goals, then what do you possibly have to say? Nothing, so shutup.
Top
2 for cheating
Posts: 24
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 1:48 pm

Post by 2 for cheating »

Cabela10 wrote:Wilcox did play this game against Simley but what does that matter. If you weren't there, don't comment. If you didn't see the goals, then what do you possibly have to say? Nothing, so shutup.
That's why I was asking.

How did the next Al Stalock not deliver against SIMLEY?

Good thing Hill didn't have to play against him. :lol:
Top
Cabela10
Posts: 292
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 3:23 am

Post by Cabela10 »

2 for cheating wrote:
Cabela10 wrote:Wilcox did play this game against Simley but what does that matter. If you weren't there, don't comment. If you didn't see the goals, then what do you possibly have to say? Nothing, so shutup.
That's why I was asking.

How did the next Al Stalock not deliver against SIMLEY?

Good thing Hill didn't have to play against him. :lol:
How didn't he deliver in this game? Simley should have won this game 5-1 or 5-2. The whole first period alone was 2 on 1s and 3 on 1's. Pretty tough to stop those all game long.

Again, if you have no clue, why comment about something. Show up to a game and form your own opinions, instead of reading the boxscore and getting fat.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Minnesota High School Hockey (Older Topics)”