Roseau or Edina? Whos the best?
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
The Govs' houses are much easier to find than the Pioneers' for those State Tournament parties however, because when we send the invitations, the addresses are spelled correctly!Pioneerprideguy wrote:Which are better furnished that Govie houses!Govs93 wrote:And if this were Section 6 (or Section 1), the Pioneers would be watching the Tourney from their cabins.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Everyone needs a stepping stone. We may provide that for these two fine programs & Johnson will likely provide that for us. If this where a food chain, Johnson would be a bottom feeder.![]()
All that money for school, PPG, and not one typing class?
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
Sorry for my delayed response. I had to tell a couple of Johnson graduates the difference between trash & recycle.
We really can't seem to comunicate on the same level. You keep talking about Hill's recent failures at the State tournament, yet Johnson can't seem to get out of sections. Which is worse...losing in sections or losing in state?
We really can't seem to comunicate on the same level. You keep talking about Hill's recent failures at the State tournament, yet Johnson can't seem to get out of sections. Which is worse...losing in sections or losing in state?
Well, as you're aware, both options suck, but the difference in terms of Johnson and Hill-Murray is that when they lose (and both do - as you knowPioneerprideguy wrote:Sorry for my delayed response. I had to tell a couple of Johnson graduates the difference between trash & recycle.
We really can't seem to comunicate on the same level. You keep talking about Hill's recent failures at the State tournament, yet Johnson can't seem to get out of sections. Which is worse...losing in sections or losing in state?

If you buy into Hill-Murray's whining after their annual exit from the postseason, you'd think there were fewer victims at Pearl Harbor than there are on Larpenteur Ave.
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
Not sure I ever whine or make excuses after a Hill loss. Nor did I ever try to justify losing to Century last year. Century earned a trip to state (unlike most peopleGovs93 wrote:Well, as you're aware, both options suck, but the difference in terms of Johnson and Hill-Murray is that when they lose (and both do - as you knowPioneerprideguy wrote:Sorry for my delayed response. I had to tell a couple of Johnson graduates the difference between trash & recycle.
We really can't seem to comunicate on the same level. You keep talking about Hill's recent failures at the State tournament, yet Johnson can't seem to get out of sections. Which is worse...losing in sections or losing in state?), Johnson doesn't offer up excuses and claim that everybody was out to get them.
If you buy into Hill-Murray's whining after their annual exit from the postseason, you'd think there were fewer victims at Pearl Harbor than there are on Larpenteur Ave.


Well now you're ruining this fun by just flat out lying. You know for a fact that I have repeatedly said I want Johnson to get a crack at Hill-Murray. Even if the Govs aren't the team that will end any thought of a Pioneer title (and we all know that somebody will), I have said several times that I want the Govs to get a shot. Tell the people the truth, and don't cower behind the usual HM rhetoric.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Not sure I ever whine or make excuses after a Hill loss. Nor did I ever try to justify losing to Century last year. Century earned a trip to state (unlike most peopleGovs93 wrote:Well, as you're aware, both options suck, but the difference in terms of Johnson and Hill-Murray is that when they lose (and both do - as you knowPioneerprideguy wrote:Sorry for my delayed response. I had to tell a couple of Johnson graduates the difference between trash & recycle.
We really can't seem to comunicate on the same level. You keep talking about Hill's recent failures at the State tournament, yet Johnson can't seem to get out of sections. Which is worse...losing in sections or losing in state?), Johnson doesn't offer up excuses and claim that everybody was out to get them.
If you buy into Hill-Murray's whining after their annual exit from the postseason, you'd think there were fewer victims at Pearl Harbor than there are on Larpenteur Ave.) & was a pretty darn good club. You on the other hand look for others to do something you wish your club could do & thats beat Hill. Advance farther than Hill this year or else...
ill give you one better johnsons program has gone so far down hill a lifepresurver is an after thought. the ship has already sunk. talk about playing a soft schedule play johnson.. i know what happen ther too. johnson had a rich history people were use to winning but they didnt want to work to hard for it so when things started to slid they all bailed to other associations like say wayzata for example. 

-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
roflmao!!! C'mon PPG... even you have to admit this guy isn't helping your cause. This post is so ridiculous on so many levels, I won't even respond. If I were you, I'd tell this guy that you candle things youself!watchdog wrote:ill give you one better johnsons program has gone so far down hill a lifepresurver is an after thought. the ship has already sunk. talk about playing a soft schedule play johnson.. i know what happen ther too. johnson had a rich history people were use to winning but they didnt want to work to hard for it so when things started to slid they all bailed to other associations like say wayzata for example.

"lifepresurver"?!



-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
I haven't seen anybody twist things around that much since Chubby Checker.Pioneerprideguy wrote:Sounds like the Govs is trying to play both sides...we want a shots at Hill, even though we probably won't win. What a wuess! Either back your school or be quiet. I think maybe you might be better suited for a high school basketball "bored".
I don't know how you think I'm playing both sides. I want Johnson to get a shot. Period. No excuses, no hiding - unlike you who won't admit he's just lying.
Show the people what the Pioneers are really made of, PPG. Go ahead. Tell them I never asked for anybody else to take your squad down... I'll pull my quotes and your responses and post them if it helps!



whats so rediculous about it? you the govs drive all the way to roseau last year for running time at two or three levels.. yet your all over the board running your mouth about soft schedules. heck the govs are part of the problem if everyone one was goooood wed all have a tuff schedule. peewees are 3-20 and the bantams are 12-12 playing teams i havent even heard of lol.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! maybe you should change your user name befor you come on here bashing roseau and the likes of. its embarrassing for ya...
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
"Even if the the Govs aren't the team to end any thought of a Pioneer title..." Weak. Ya talk trash about a program and then you back off?? Either Hills sucks or Johnson sucks...which one? I'm taking shots at your team this year & won't back away if they play each other. I think Hill wins. You don't see me backing away! You want to play with a safety net...come on, take a chance....
rofl... Ok, you've gone beyond pathetic now, liar, so this will be my last post on this here. I've made you look foolish enough for one day (actually, you did a better job of making youself look bad than I did!Pioneerprideguy wrote:"Even if the the Govs aren't the team to end any thought of a Pioneer title..." Weak. Ya talk trash about a program and then you back off?? Either Hills sucks or Johnson sucks...which one? I'm taking shots at your team this year & won't back away if they play each other. I think Hill wins. You don't see me backing away! You want to play with a safety net...come on, take a chance....

If I were a gambling person, would I pick Johnson to beat HM? Of couse not, as I've said time and again - things are what they are. Does that mean that the Govs should bow down or that they "suck"? No way. You have to be kidding.
Now, could Johnson win? Yes - they could. Needless to say, they'd need every bounce to go their way, and play the absolute correct gameplan, but it could. If you can't acknowledge the fact that all I've ever said is that we want a shot, you're a sad person, but the correct reflection of your snot nosed school.
So to answer your incredibly lame question "who sucks?"... the answer is that on the ice, Hill-Murray is the better team - but in general - Hill-Murray sucks!!!



-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
Well, since this is a hockey forum (not really sure your lack of knowledge belongs here) we will keep the focus on hockey. This year's Johnson hockey team is bad & Hill's team is good. Those that are bad, should keep quiet about those that are good. Pretty simple...even for a public school guy like yourself. 

-
- Posts: 935
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:27 pm
-
- Posts: 312
- Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 12:45 am
DmanDad1980 wrote:Okay boys...
Back to the thread...
Lee stands on his head on March 8th (Saturday), and Budish hits the twine twice, Leer once... But the Rams get four, one from Ness, two from Landman, and the winner from Knockemus...
Rams 4 Hornets 3, in a game to be remembered for many years...![]()
IMO
IM PRETTY SURE MARSHALL WILL HAVE A GOAL THATS ALL HES DONE ALL YEAR IS SCORE GOALS
-
- Posts: 265
- Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2008 12:36 am
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am