Where's Fredrick?

abc123 · Post by **abc123** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 1:36 pm

I was wondering where Fredrick was on his "another way to look at Pee-wee's" I like reading his take on the districts and Regional pairings.

DMom · Post by **DMom** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:21 pm

Maybe, like Watchdog, he just got tired of it all here on the bored. Or, there are a lot of pairings, maybe he's still writing...... we can hope.

O-townClown · Post by **O-townClown** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 2:42 pm

abc123 wrote:I was wondering where Fredrick was on his "another way to look at Pee-wee's" I like reading his take on the districts and Regional pairings.

Where's Frederick? He's been posting recently. Maybe not for a few days, but I think a good question is where's Jancze? Dude evaporated.

slasher · Post by **slasher** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:29 pm

Where's TOMASS and THE BOOGEYMAN?

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 3:42 pm

slasher wrote:Where's TOMASS and THE BOOGEYMAN?

They're gone.

slasher · Post by **slasher** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:16 pm

elliott70 wrote:
slasher wrote:Where's TOMASS and THE BOOGEYMAN?
They're gone.

They're gone?

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:55 pm

slasher wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
slasher wrote:Where's TOMASS and THE BOOGEYMAN?
They're gone.
They're gone?

Admin has banned them, as warned.

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:57 pm

elliott70 wrote:
slasher wrote:
elliott70 wrote: They're gone.
They're gone?
Admin has banned them, as warned.

Just like SuddenDeath, and I am sure Bernie007 is close to slipping into it also.

RobRay · Post by **RobRay** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 5:57 pm

slasher wrote:Where's TOMASS?

Where's "breakout"?

bernie007 · Post by **bernie007** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 6:19 pm

elliott70 wrote:
elliott70 wrote:
slasher wrote: They're gone?
Admin has banned them, as warned.

Just like SuddenDeath, and I am sure Bernie007 is close to slipping into it also.

It is unfortunate that everyone can rip on Mn Made the cidiots the Machine the Fire Tier1 and on and on and that is not tiresome. But then when the
table is turned to prove a point that what they have done is wrong and
now it is time to hold their actions accountable and they pout and cry and
quit the forum. Talk sensible and so will I , but to constantly hear of all the
false and untrue commentary that is going on. So go ahead ban me and
then you all can have a free pot shot. I would say that some not all need
to look in the mirror on this one. Thanks and Happy Hockey to all..

slasher · Post by **slasher** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:25 pm

Bernie- Keep speaking the truth.

No one will ban you.

Some people need to get off their high horses and worry about other things.

It's beyond me why some people are so miserable that they have to make things up about other people or programs.

As long as you speak the truth. The truth will prevail in the end.

slasher · Post by **slasher** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 7:28 pm

Did Boogyman and tomass really get banned? How many names did they both have?
Was one of them Breakout?

ironrangehockey55 · Post by **ironrangehockey55** » Tue Feb 12, 2008 8:35 pm

watchdog please don't go. don't let a couple of people get under your skin. your posts will be missed. ignore bernie 007 and ecellhockey guy. watch out for Slasher to as it is odd he comes on posting alot when boogy is banned talking about chaska and appluading bernie 007. just ignore those guys and stick with it. Im sure many others feel the same way.

slasher · Post by **slasher** » Wed Feb 13, 2008 7:03 am

ironrangehockey55 wrote:watchdog please don't go. don't let a couple of people get under your skin. your posts will be missed. ignore bernie 007 and ecellhockey guy. watch out for Slasher to as it is odd he comes on posting alot when boogy is banned talking about chaska and appluading bernie 007. just ignore those guys and stick with it. Im sure many others feel the same way.

Ironrange- I signed up for this site a while ago. Please do not associate me with any wrong doing. I usually stay neutral. I knew if I commented on something someone would have a problem. Looks like I'll have to stay idle for a while. I'd hate to hurt anyones feelings.

frederick61 · Post by **frederick61** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:42 pm

It is nice to know that I was missed. My in-law ran into problems with his pc and abscounded with mine for a week. So I just went to hockey games, D6 and D8 mostly. Saw Burnsville PWA beat Eagan 3-2 a week ago. Eagan is back to struggling. Everybody here has covered the D6 playoffs. But I did go to Lakeville Hasse Arena to see a D8 playin game between Northfield and Farmington.

Northfield won, if I remember right, the final score was 4-1. But during the second period, Northfield who skates only 10 forwards, lost a player and then drew coincidental minor penalities. That left them with 7 forwards skating 5-3. I like #8 on Northfield. He is not as flashy as other players, but has a good understanding of the game.

The coach put him on the point, taking the faceoff, and he single handedly held the Farmington on the wrong side of the blueline for two minutes. It was quite a feat when you think of one player skating that position for two minutes and covering all that ice.

This weekend will be an exciting as all the district playoffs start to roll.

hiptzech · Post by **hiptzech** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 2:49 pm

frederick61 wrote:It is nice to know that I was missed. My in-law ran into problems with his pc and abscounded with mine for a week. So I just went to hockey games, D6 and D8 mostly. Saw Burnsville PWA beat Eagan 3-2 a week ago. Eagan is back to struggling. Everybody here has covered the D6 playoffs. But I did go to Lakeville Hasse Arena to see a D8 playin game between Northfield and Farmington.

Northfield won, if I remember right, the final score was 4-1. But during the second period, Northfield who skates only 10 forwards, lost a player and then drew coincidental minor penalities. That left them with 7 forwards skating 5-3. I like #8 on Northfield. He is not as flashy as other players, but has a good understanding of the game.

The coach put him on the point, taking the faceoff, and he single handedly held the Farmington on the wrong side of the blueline for two minutes. It was quite a feat when you think of one player skating that position for two minutes and covering all that ice.

This weekend will be an exciting as all the district playoffs start to roll.

Welcome back Freddy...I even missed you...

DMom · Post by **DMom** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 3:46 pm

Welcome back!!

CoachJ · Post by **CoachJ** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:25 pm

"Saw Burnsville PWA beat Eagan 3-2 a week ago. Eagan is back to struggling. " fredrick come on

How can you say struggling? 3-2L to Burnsville. Av took 3 OT's to score 3 goals against Burnsville in playoffs. So please give a little credit to burnsville. Both Eagan & Burnsville can hang with anyone.

Welcome back

love2skate · Post by **love2skate** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 4:55 pm

Fredrick61...glad to see you are back.
Yes, others have covered D6 etc., but your take is always insightful and good reading with lots of information. We've missed your thoughts

AimHigh · Post by **AimHigh** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:26 pm

Welcome back!

Just in time, too, I was beginning to seriously believe that you were the sensitive and insightful side of TomAss.

frederick61 · Post by **frederick61** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 5:49 pm

CoachJ wrote:"Saw Burnsville PWA beat Eagan 3-2 a week ago. Eagan is back to struggling. " fredrick come on

How can you say struggling? 3-2L to Burnsville. Av took 3 OT's to score 3 goals against Burnsville in playoffs. So please give a little credit to burnsville. Both Eagan & Burnsville can hang with anyone.

Welcome back

Thank you for the welcome back. But let me give you my view of "struggling". In the Burnsville game, Eagan played only the last two periods against the better of the two Burnsville goalies. They scored their two goals in the first period.

When I saw them play the Rochester Red team a month ago, they were up and aggressively attacking in the offensive zone. That intensity was not there. As an excuse, I will give them the benefit of the fact that was a late scrimmage on a school night and they had played two games against tough teams the two days before that game.

But Rosemount or South St. Paul will be their competition on a Monday night in Hastings. South St. Paul lost to Eagan 4-2 a few weeks ago and Rosemount pushed Eagan in the championship game of the Alexander Tourney before losing 6-3 the first week end in February.

A number of the better Eagan players showed little against Burnsville. There were no booming quick shots from the point and despite their superior size, they were moved out from the front of the Burnsville net. They may have been tired, but D8 playoffs are not easy especially if you lose the first game. That’s why I think they are struggling. Eagan should be hanging with the Woodbury’s and Edina’s.

This is not about the coaching, it’s about kids playing hockey when the sun hangs in the sky longer and baseball or other things start to interest them. I wish Eagan good luck in the tourney. I would like to see them playing in St. Louis Park.

CoachJ · Post by **CoachJ** » Fri Feb 15, 2008 7:23 pm

frederick61 wrote:
CoachJ wrote:"Saw Burnsville PWA beat Eagan 3-2 a week ago. Eagan is back to struggling. " fredrick come on

How can you say struggling? 3-2L to Burnsville. Av took 3 OT's to score 3 goals against Burnsville in playoffs. So please give a little credit to burnsville. Both Eagan & Burnsville can hang with anyone.

Welcome back
Thank you for the welcome back. But let me give you my view of "struggling". In the Burnsville game, Eagan played only the last two periods against the better of the two Burnsville goalies. They scored their two goals in the first period.

When I saw them play the Rochester Red team a month ago, they were up and aggressively attacking in the offensive zone. That intensity was not there. As an excuse, I will give them the benefit of the fact that was a late scrimmage on a school night and they had played two games against tough teams the two days before that game.

But Rosemount or South St. Paul will be their competition on a Monday night in Hastings. South St. Paul lost to Eagan 4-2 a few weeks ago and Rosemount pushed Eagan in the championship game of the Alexander Tourney before losing 6-3 the first week end in February.

A number of the better Eagan players showed little against Burnsville. There were no booming quick shots from the point and despite their superior size, they were moved out from the front of the Burnsville net. They may have been tired, but D8 playoffs are not easy especially if you lose the first game. That’s why I think they are struggling. Eagan should be hanging with the Woodbury’s and Edina’s.

This is not about the coaching, it’s about kids playing hockey when the sun hangs in the sky longer and baseball or other things start to interest them. I wish Eagan good luck in the tourney. I would like to see them playing in St. Louis Park.

I like it. That's what I wanted a little understanding of why Eagan was struggling. They beat Chaska and Chaska is playing as good as anyone right now. So I now see your point on the Burnsville game though. Thanks Again for all your work on this website. If I every started a Peewee hockey newspaper you would be the first guy I would hire to cover games for me. Thanks Again

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Where's Fredrick?

Where's Fredrick?

tired of the crap

Re: Where's Fredrick?