sounds like the floaters just about choked down a good one...4 to 1 after one and then down 6-5 after two and then the floaters win 9-7, was this just a lack of goaltending, defense, or both? the flyers better now play like this is sections or i could see an early upset
This game was horably officated I hate the floaters and want to see them lose but the officals should never decide a game like they almost did tonite I finally have to give the floaters a little respect for over coming bias officating but not much, so get off my back ap and demon.
flameofshame69 wrote:This game was horably officated I hate the floaters and want to see them lose but the officals should never decide a game like they almost did tonite I finally have to give the floaters a little respect for over coming bias officating but not much, so get off my back ap and demon.
Glad to see we agree on one thing flamejob. Yeah these officals were bad but the best team always finds a way to win. Number 4 for tech should have been kicked out What a cheap player, I would say he might over take Gaffke of Fergus after tonights game as the cheapest player in the CLC.
Number 4 for Tech is CHEAP? Because he sprayed the goalie going to the net? Gimmie a break. He plays the game hard and likes to do some jawing, but I saw a number of Flyers flapping their gums as well. I believe he had one penalty, maybe two. How does that constitute cheap?
The best team always finds a way to win. Spearl didn't look too great between the pipes tonight and the terrible officiating didn't help too much either. Coach Couture still looked upset after the win but i don't blame him after giving up a 3 goal lead. This game does show me one thing LF can win in the high scoring games as well as the low scoring games such as the alex game. I doubt that any 6A team could score 5 goals in one period against little falls. Tech has played some tough teams and played them well. All i have to say is good luck who has these guys in sections it isn't gonna be an easy game for any team.
zippitydoda wrote:Number 4 for Tech is CHEAP? Because he sprayed the goalie going to the net? Gimmie a break. He plays the game hard and likes to do some jawing, but I saw a number of Flyers flapping their gums as well. I believe he had one penalty, maybe two. How does that constitute cheap?
It wouldn't be cheap but number 4 did it well after the whistle blew
I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
BlueGoose5 wrote:I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
The better team won, period. I was thinking tech dosen't deserve to be on the same ice with a lot of Class A teams
BlueGoose5 wrote:I hate to say it, but this is yet another loss by Tech to a Class A team. This shouldn't happen to Tech Hockey, especially since they're on record saying that Class A teams don't belong on the same ice as them.
The better team won, period. I was thinking tech dosen't deserve to be on the same ice with a lot of Class A teams
Is the goalie for tech #40 a freshman If he is that boy needs to go back to bantams, a lot of soft goals last night. I can't believe the tech coach didn't pull him after the 1st period
I hate the floaters and want to see them lose but the officals should never decide a game like they almost did tonite 
I've probably said enough.....
If he is that boy needs to go back to bantams, a lot of soft goals last night. I can't believe the tech coach didn't pull him after the 1st period 