Hill Murray vs Moorhead 2-16-08
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Hill Murray vs Moorhead 2-16-08
final game for the pioneers before sections as they take the trip up north. I am still confused by the game time though. our website says 4:00 but FSN says 6:00. Anyone have a final word on time?
-
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:44 pm
- Location: State of shock/without the awe
Re: Hill Murray vs Moorhead 2-16-08
On the SPUDS website it says 6:00 pmsachishi4 wrote:final game for the pioneers before sections as they take the trip up north. I am still confused by the game time though. our website says 4:00 but FSN says 6:00. Anyone have a final word on time?
-
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Sat Jun 24, 2006 12:55 pm
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: north eastern MN
-
- Posts: 252
- Joined: Thu Jan 11, 2007 12:00 pm
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm
I just called the Moorhead Sports Center and they said the game is at 6:15 I also see that their schedule on the Classic Suburban Conference website shows 4 and 6
http://www.classicsuburban.org/g5-bin/c ... chool_id=3
http://www.classicsuburban.org/g5-bin/c ... chool_id=3
-
- Posts: 332
- Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:57 pm
I'd expect a close game with a lot of goals. I wouldn't mind seeing Moorhead get some steam to get ready for sections. They really only need to beat one outstanding team to get to state, so will be interesting. Probably would hurt the confidence to get plowed at home last game of the year.black sheep wrote:huge for the Spuds if they come out with a win....could be a scary team if confident during sections.
I'll say H-M 6-5 in OT
-
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:56 pm
Final: H-M 4, Moorhead 3
Yet again, another great game to be televised on FSN! Moorhead came out and played much better than most may have expected. The game itself was pretty back and forth, while Moorhead's goaltender made some outstanding stops on a H-M power play during the 2nd period. Most of all, it was great to see 3rd line center Lou Metcalf shelf the winning goal with just under a minute left. It had to have been a tough one for Moorhead to swallow, but they shouldn't back off as they have a club that could knock off Roseau on a good night.
Great ending to the regular season! Best of luck the rest of the way to both the Pioneers and Spuds.
Yet again, another great game to be televised on FSN! Moorhead came out and played much better than most may have expected. The game itself was pretty back and forth, while Moorhead's goaltender made some outstanding stops on a H-M power play during the 2nd period. Most of all, it was great to see 3rd line center Lou Metcalf shelf the winning goal with just under a minute left. It had to have been a tough one for Moorhead to swallow, but they shouldn't back off as they have a club that could knock off Roseau on a good night.
Great ending to the regular season! Best of luck the rest of the way to both the Pioneers and Spuds.
Moorhead v. Hill-Murray
Spuds outplayed Pioneers for a majority of the game, and were the better team tonight. However, Hill got the big break they were looking for in the final seconds and got a breakaway resulting in the winning goal. If Moorhead plays like they did tonight against Roseau, they have a very good chance of knocking them off in sections.
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
I was disappointed in Hill's performance tonight. Yes it's a nice win against a solid program, but Hill has some issues. I will not be surprised at all if they do not get out of sections (keep an eye on Roseville). Hill is way too careless with the puck & Hill's D scare me! They struggle way too much getting out of their own end & in a tight game in sections, one turnover may end their season. You wanna beat Hill, pressure their D, it's been that way for years. Hopefully they will continue to score goals to overcompensate thier precieved weakness (in my book).
But a win is a win & congrats on a fine regular season guys. Good luck from here on out & let's hope there's a string of 6 wins awaiting ya!
But a win is a win & congrats on a fine regular season guys. Good luck from here on out & let's hope there's a string of 6 wins awaiting ya!
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
7,325th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002 ~Lame Power Play~











Re: 7,325th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002 ~Lame Power Play~
slapshooter wrote:![]()
Spud(ters) PP with the 5 on 3 in the third was
![]()
S
S
UNDEFEATED
2
8
SLAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
PP, you were the one talking me out of my disappointment early in the year. The kids are what they are, which is not a great defensive team. They really miss the stud defensmen that teams like Minnetonka and Roseau boast. That is why Hill in a tier below. But also remember, we have 6 defensemen, 2 of which are seniors, 2 juniors and 2 sophmores. Those kids will be better next year and we still have the firepower to beat anyone. We're still weak on defense and Flip doesn't make enough high end saves although can't think of any goals tonight that were his fault. We'll make it through sections, but only due to the fact the rest of the section is so down this year.Pioneerprideguy wrote:I was disappointed in Hill's performance tonight. Yes it's a nice win against a solid program, but Hill has some issues. I will not be surprised at all if they do not get out of sections (keep an eye on Roseville). Hill is way too careless with the puck & Hill's D scare me! They struggle way too much getting out of their own end & in a tight game in sections, one turnover may end their season. You wanna beat Hill, pressure their D, it's been that way for years. Hopefully they will continue to score goals to overcompensate thier precieved weakness (in my book).
But a win is a win & congrats on a fine regular season guys. Good luck from here on out & let's hope there's a string of 6 wins awaiting ya!
-
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2002 12:30 pm
7,326th post by SS since Feb 27th 2002 ~Lame Power Play~
Sparlimb wrote:slapshooter wrote:![]()
Spud(ters) PP with the 5 on 3 in the third was
![]()
S
S
UNDEFEATED
2
8
SLAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY











-
- Posts: 96
- Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 8:47 pm
I'm not making excuses or saying one side should of won, cause I'm not a fan of either team. However, can anyone explain to me why that wasn't a 5 for the check from behind at the end? In HS hockey the refs need to call that everytime regardless. Don't think I've seen a more prime canidate--really dumb play by the HM player. If you see the numbers don't do it--much less take a run from the top of the circle. 
