Section 3A

hockeyperson2 · Post by **hockeyperson2** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 6:14 pm

who is this guy? Are you writing bad stuff about your own team mates? Boy, you must be a real team player or you must be run'n scared...pull up your pants wannabe, you look stupid.

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 7:00 pm

hockeyperson2 wrote:who is this guy? Are you writing bad stuff about your own team mates? Boy, you must be a real team player or you must be run'n scared...pull up your pants wannabe, you look stupid.

?????? what?????

show_timer39 · Post by **show_timer39** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 9:33 pm

Ok anyway! Anyone have any scores from tonights games?

Bhindthemask · Post by **Bhindthemask** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:44 pm

show_timer39 wrote:Ok anyway! Anyone have any scores from tonights games?

Luverne 6
Fairmont 1

Windom 9
Sleepy Eye 0
after 2

Worthington ?
Redwood?

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:55 pm

I found this on www.followthepuck.com

"Section 3A: New Ulm - I really wanted to pick Marshall but they have had a tale of two seasons, one before January 12th and one after. The Tigers were 11-2-1 up to that day but 5-5-1 after. They defeated New Ulm in impressive style 7-1 back in December but, in the rematch, the Eagles destroyed the Tigers 9-0 in New Ulm on February 7th. Another team that I am keeping my eye on is Luverne. They had won eight in a row before losing to Windom that they had beaten twice before. Hutchinson and Litchfield could be heard from before it is all over but New Ulm seems to have a little more strength in this Section."

Thought this could maybe spark some conversation before playoffs start rollin

ap4mvp · Post by **ap4mvp** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 10:55 pm

Bhindthemask wrote:
show_timer39 wrote:Ok anyway! Anyone have any scores from tonights games?
Luverne 6
Fairmont 1

Windom 9
Sleepy Eye 0
after 2

Worthington ?
Redwood?

come on, I had sleepy eye going all the way

powerplay009 · Post by **powerplay009** » Tue Feb 19, 2008 11:22 pm

Redwood 5, Worthington 4

RoarzgEagles19 · Post by **RoarzgEagles19** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 12:23 pm

minnhockey33 wrote:I found this on www.followthepuck.com

"Section 3A: New Ulm - I really wanted to pick Marshall but they have had a tale of two seasons, one before January 12th and one after. The Tigers were 11-2-1 up to that day but 5-5-1 after. They defeated New Ulm in impressive style 7-1 back in December but, in the rematch, the Eagles destroyed the Tigers 9-0 in New Ulm on February 7th. Another team that I am keeping my eye on is Luverne. They had won eight in a row before losing to Windom that they had beaten twice before. Hutchinson and Litchfield could be heard from before it is all over but New Ulm seems to have a little more strength in this Section."

Thought this could maybe spark some conversation before playoffs start rollin

Marshall is looking poor lately, so I'm fairly sure it will come down to New Ulm, Litch, and Hutch.

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 1:09 pm

RoarzgEagles19 wrote:
minnhockey33 wrote:I found this on www.followthepuck.com

"Section 3A: New Ulm - I really wanted to pick Marshall but they have had a tale of two seasons, one before January 12th and one after. The Tigers were 11-2-1 up to that day but 5-5-1 after. They defeated New Ulm in impressive style 7-1 back in December but, in the rematch, the Eagles destroyed the Tigers 9-0 in New Ulm on February 7th. Another team that I am keeping my eye on is Luverne. They had won eight in a row before losing to Windom that they had beaten twice before. Hutchinson and Litchfield could be heard from before it is all over but New Ulm seems to have a little more strength in this Section."

Thought this could maybe spark some conversation before playoffs start rollin
Marshall is looking poor lately, so I'm fairly sure it will come down to New Ulm, Litch, and Hutch.

I wouldn't call losing to hutch in OT poor, nor would i say beating dodge county 5-0 when NU beat them 5-2 is poor either..they had a rough couple of games with AL and NU, but otherwise i don't think you can count them out

And also i don't think anyone should count willmar out, if they get by marshall tomorrow they just may surprise your mighty eagles..They have already this season.

bombsquad06 · Post by **bombsquad06** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 2:10 pm

Take a chill pill and watch some hockey. Talk about it after the games are played. Wow!!

sregit34 · Post by **sregit34** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:54 pm

bombsquad06 wrote:Take a chill pill and watch some hockey. Talk about it after the games are played. Wow!!

Agreed.! Good Post.

FunTimes · Post by **FunTimes** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:22 pm

My prediction for the Marshall vs. Willmar game is going to be Marshall winning 5-2.

SC.elite918 · Post by **SC.elite918** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 9:25 pm

What are your perdictions for tomorrows games?

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Wed Feb 20, 2008 10:37 pm

New Ulm 9
Redwood 2

Hutch 6
Luverne 2

Litch 4
Windom 1

Marshall 3 with an empty netter
Willmar 1

RoarzgEagles19 · Post by **RoarzgEagles19** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:31 pm

Willmar 5
Marshall 4 OT

New Ulm 6
Redwood 2

Hutch 4
Luverne 1

Litch 7
Windom 2

SC.elite918 · Post by **SC.elite918** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:49 pm

Marshall 4
Willmar 2

New Ulm 7
Redwood 1

Hutch 6
Luverne 1

Litch 5
Windom 2

goalieguy_14 · Post by **goalieguy_14** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 3:51 pm

Willmar-5 with an empty netter
Marshall-3

Litchfield-4
Windom-1

Hutch-4
Luverne-2

New Ulm-8
Redwood-1

for the semis i think nu vs willmar will be a great game and i cant put a score on it, and im predicting litch over hutch 4-2, i think litch will play great against hutch and come away with a big victory.The Championship is a toss up as well.

FunTimes · Post by **FunTimes** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:11 pm

Final Score Marshall-6 Willmar-4

RoarzgEagles19 · Post by **RoarzgEagles19** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:26 pm

New Ulm 4
Redwood 0

cjmhockey19 · Post by **cjmhockey19** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:29 pm

Is this a Final???

hock99 · Post by **hock99** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:42 pm

Marshall vs. Willmar: one of the best games ive seen

brahjaw · Post by **brahjaw** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 9:50 pm

hutch did not play there best game at all! their still able to get the win over luverne 4 to 3 bad game hutch!

hutch 4
final score
luverne 3

sick_dangles08 · Post by **sick_dangles08** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:06 pm

hock99 wrote:Marshall vs. Willmar: one of the best games ive seen

I concur

minnhockey33 · Post by **minnhockey33** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:14 pm

sick_dangles08 wrote:
hock99 wrote:Marshall vs. Willmar: one of the best games ive seen
I concur

I also agree with this....it is the kind of game you expect to see in the playoffs(maybe not the high score but the intensity)...it was back and forth the whole game until they scored I believe 3 unanswered goals in the middle of the third....both teams kept battling the whole game...

sicksnipes093 · Post by **sicksnipes093** » Thu Feb 21, 2008 10:27 pm

i would definatly have to agree with that.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section 3A

nobarevolution

Re: nobarevolution

3a

Re: 3a

hutch/luverne