Hill's Year(s into next decade)

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:26 pm

Maybe Hill should schedule teams like Minnetonka, Benilde, Holy Angels, East, or Moorhead. Would that make people happy? Would that get them better prepared if they are fortunate enough to get to state? Oh wait, hill played those teams this year....umm, never mind.

Dazed&Confused · Post by **Dazed&Confused** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:32 pm

Dont leave out White Bear and St Thomas

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:35 pm

They are part of our annual schedule that most consider "peewee" level. Two very solid programs, but apparently do nothing to help Hill.

sachishi4 · Post by **sachishi4** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:04 pm

yep, they definitely scheduled some softies this year.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:12 pm

sachishi4 wrote:yep, they definitely scheduled some softies this year.

There's still the Park fiasco...

Hill should go independant in hockey scheduling. They are a very desirable team to play if they could open up some dates. Maybe a half conference schedule?

Dazed&Confused · Post by **Dazed&Confused** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:16 pm

Maybe we could schedule a few games with the MN WILD. Play a Div 1 school here and there and maybe the USHL when we are just slumin.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:18 pm

Neutron 14 wrote:
sachishi4 wrote:yep, they definitely scheduled some softies this year.
There's still the Park fiasco...

Hill should go independant in hockey scheduling. They are a very desirable team to play if they could open up some dates. Maybe a half conference schedule?

The same Park that beat WB?

We've discussed this situation in a different thread. They will remain loyal to their conference...just like St. Thomas.

slapshot88 · Post by **slapshot88** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:31 pm

Hill will win state no doubt and Zepida is mr. hockey next year.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 5:41 pm

slapshot88 wrote:Hill will win state no doubt and Zepida is mr. hockey next year.

Always nice to hear contributions from the back of the room.

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:47 pm

parrish4president wrote: (like they do so frequently).

like scoring...

winning...

playing on TV...

going to state...

graduating top student athletes...

having fun...

making the bored envious....

Your 5 words above sum up the Hill-Murray hockey experience;

you need not say more,

except...

What is your squad's ranking?

What is your squad's all-time record versus the Pioneers?

How many times have you gone to State since 1975?

Dazed&Confused · Post by **Dazed&Confused** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 7:51 pm

Let him have it Pistol

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:33 pm

slapshot88 wrote:Zepida is mr. hockey next year.

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:34 pm

wbmd wrote:
slapshot88 wrote:Zepida is mr. hockey next year.

Does he mean zepeda?

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:37 pm

Bash Brother wrote:
wbmd wrote:
slapshot88 wrote:Zepida is mr. hockey next year.

Does he mean zepeda?

Obviously he does.

Bash Brother · Post by **Bash Brother** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 8:39 pm

wbmd wrote:
Bash Brother wrote:
wbmd wrote:
Does he mean zepeda?
Obviously he does.

He oughtta learn to spell the name of the kid he is picking to win mr. hockey more than a year in advance.

Don't_Cost_Nothin · Post by **Don't_Cost_Nothin** » Mon Feb 25, 2008 9:00 pm

pistol wrote:
parrish4president wrote: (like they do so frequently).

What is your squad's ranking?

What is your squad's all-time record versus the Pioneers?

How many times have you gone to State since 1975?

For sake of the Bored!

Holy Angels

14, They had a down year, recruiting was slow.

6-0-1 Your squad has NEVER beaten them.

5 but they have just as many state titles in less than a quarter of the appearances.

I will give you this though Pistol. It did take some digging just to find that one.

CityHockey11 · Post by **CityHockey11** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:02 am

I graduated from Hill not too far back (ok it coming up on eight years, but who's counting?), and I have nothing but disdain and loathing for the Pioneers hockey program. I have not been on this bored long, in fact this is my inagural post, but no one mentions how blantently they recruit. Of course you can have this great hockey dynasty (this cannot be denied), if you are sniping a goalie from this school and your entire second line from another (this being back in 99-00). If this is deemed to be an acceptable practice, then fine, but then don't claim that you are all on a level playing field. A.B.H.M. (anybody but hill murray).

Sparlimb · Post by **Sparlimb** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:24 am

CityHockey11 wrote:I graduated from Hill not too far back (ok it coming up on eight years, but who's counting?), and I have nothing but disdain and loathing for the Pioneers hockey program. I have not been on this bored long, in fact this is my inagural post, but no one mentions how blantently they recruit. Of course you can have this great hockey dynasty (this cannot be denied), if you are sniping a goalie from this school and your entire second line from another (this being back in 99-00). If this is deemed to be an acceptable practice, then fine, but then don't claim that you are all on a level playing field. A.B.H.M. (anybody but hill murray).

Clearly an unbiased, thoughtful and fair opinion. You could work for Fox News...

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:28 am

Sparlimb wrote:
CityHockey11 wrote:I graduated from Hill not too far back (ok it coming up on eight years, but who's counting?), and I have nothing but disdain and loathing for the Pioneers hockey program. I have not been on this bored long, in fact this is my inagural post, but no one mentions how blantently they recruit. Of course you can have this great hockey dynasty (this cannot be denied), if you are sniping a goalie from this school and your entire second line from another (this being back in 99-00). If this is deemed to be an acceptable practice, then fine, but then don't claim that you are all on a level playing field. A.B.H.M. (anybody but hill murray).
Clearly an unbiased, thoughtful and fair opinion.

Well I certainly thought so.

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:31 am

Easy to pick out the frauds!

Nobody would recruit you.

When were you cut?

CityHockey11 · Post by **CityHockey11** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:32 am

Clearly an unbiased, thoughtful and fair opinion. You could work for Fox News...[/quote]

Who said anything about being unbiased? I'm just saying it seems a ridiculous to brag year in and year out when clearly things are not what they seem. If it was just common knowledge that players were recruited it wouldn't be as bad. Just lay it out like any pro team would when they sign a player (for example: Junior Forward X signed from Mounds View, will recieve two years free tuition). Full disclosure, that's all.

CityHockey11 · Post by **CityHockey11** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:33 am

pistol wrote:Easy to pick out the frauds!

Nobody would recruit you.

When were you cut?

Never cut, never played....

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:36 am

Plus he never amounted to anything... blames others.

Neutron 14 · Post by **Neutron 14** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:38 am

CityHockey11 wrote:: Junior Forward X signed from Mounds View, will recieve two years free tuition)

Privates use words like "finacial aid"....

You sure your from Hill???

pistol · Post by **pistol** » Tue Feb 26, 2008 11:40 am

Neutron 14 wrote:
CityHockey11 wrote:: Junior Forward X signed from Mounds View, will recieve two years free tuition)
Privates use words like "finacial aid"....

You sure your from Hill???

We never use words like "finacial...."

You must be from Circle Pines.