Not impressed
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Not impressed
I'm not impressed with the states leading scorer Litchfield (he has done absolutley nothing,) nor am I impressed with Mankato State recruit Leiverman. This just goes to show how soft their schedule is!
-
- Posts: 5339
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:46 am
post 10132
Litchfield didn't have a great game. He was pretty good, but not what I thought.Newguy07 wrote:I'm not impressed with the states leading scorer Litchfield (he has done absolutley nothing,) nor am I impressed with Mankato State recruit Leiverman. This just goes to show how soft their schedule is!
Leiverman, on the other hand was outstanding. He made a lot of things happen.
They are both very good hockey players and there is no question about that.
Re: Not impressed
you must know a lot about hockey to make that statement. your my hero.Newguy07 wrote:I'm not impressed with the states leading scorer Litchfield (he has done absolutley nothing,) nor am I impressed with Mankato State recruit Leiverman. This just goes to show how soft their schedule is!
Re: post 10132
:agree: I agree with boblee, wasn't Litchfields greatest game but Cory Leiverman was all over the ice making plays and throwing the body around. You couldn't move the guy off his skates. He will be a factor for MSU (I think that's where he's going)boblee wrote:Litchfield didn't have a great game. He was pretty good, but not what I thought.Newguy07 wrote:I'm not impressed with the states leading scorer Litchfield (he has done absolutley nothing,) nor am I impressed with Mankato State recruit Leiverman. This just goes to show how soft their schedule is!
Leiverman, on the other hand was outstanding. He made a lot of things happen.
They are both very good hockey players and there is no question about that.
Re: post 10132
boblee wrote:Litchfield didn't have a great game. He was pretty good, but not what I thought.Newguy07 wrote:I'm not impressed with the states leading scorer Litchfield (he has done absolutley nothing,) nor am I impressed with Mankato State recruit Leiverman. This just goes to show how soft their schedule is!
Leiverman, on the other hand was outstanding. He made a lot of things happen.
They are both very good hockey players and there is no question about that.
agreed, well put
I was just getting a thread going, obviously I was not giving an indepth analysis. How can you say leiverman had a great game? How many scoring opportunities did he generate for his team, not many. And like I said before Litchfield was non existent! I expected more from these 2 players.
leiverman will be an average college player and Litchfield will be looking for a place to play next year, anyone know his plans?
leiverman will be an average college player and Litchfield will be looking for a place to play next year, anyone know his plans?
-
- Posts: 110
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 1:03 pm
What impressed me was the Mankato team, from what I've heard Duluth is supposed to be pretty good? A 2-1 come from behind win. Mankato could have been up 3-0 with a couple scoring chances. They also had a great chance to tie in the last flurry. Very very impressed with this team from southern MN. If you disagree, then I hope you weren't impressed with Duluth. Also very impressed with Bruggeman.
post 10136
Leiverman absolutely did create scoring chances. Litchfield played better in the third period. It was Leiverman's play without the puck that was so impressive. He hit people hard and often. He forechecked hard and back checked hard. Also, Litchfield made a great defensive play on a 2-on-1 late in the third. It isn't all about scoring and getting scoring chances. When you are in a game like this it is the little things that are important. Leiverman did a great job with the little things and Litchfield was good at times.Newguy07 wrote:I was just getting a thread going, obviously I was not giving an indepth analysis. How can you say leiverman had a great game? How many scoring opportunities did he generate for his team, not many. And like I said before Litchfield was non existent! I expected more from these 2 players.
leiverman will be an average college player and Litchfield will be looking for a place to play next year, anyone know his plans?
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
-
- Site Admin
- Posts: 7274
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
- Location: Proctor, MN
Next time you start a thread, how about giving it a more descriptive title than "Not impressed"?Newguy07 wrote:I was just getting a thread going, obviously I was not giving an indepth analysis. How can you say leiverman had a great game? How many scoring opportunities did he generate for his team, not many. And like I said before Litchfield was non existent! I expected more from these 2 players.
leiverman will be an average college player and Litchfield will be looking for a place to play next year, anyone know his plans?
Lee
Message Board arsonist since 2005
Egomaniac since 2006
Egomaniac since 2006
Looking at newguy's previous posts, he seems to not be impressed by a lot of players....
This comment came from him back in December....
Phillipi is so overrated. He is an average goalie on a very good team. The kid has no shot to play D-1. People need to quit pretending he is a top goaltender
This being the same phillipi who was first team all-metro
This comment came from him back in December....
Phillipi is so overrated. He is an average goalie on a very good team. The kid has no shot to play D-1. People need to quit pretending he is a top goaltender
This being the same phillipi who was first team all-metro
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:46 am
post 10146
Or he is talking about the player named Litchfield for Mankato West.5th Line Center wrote:Dog, either you are being sarcastic, or you meant to say that you were impressed with Mankato.watchdog wrote:i was very impressed with litchfield!! finally hype that lives up to its billing..
-
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 11:46 am
Re: post 10146
How confusing! Why did they have to name their family the same as the town?!boblee wrote:Or he is talking about the player named Litchfield for Mankato West.5th Line Center wrote:Dog, either you are being sarcastic, or you meant to say that you were impressed with Mankato.watchdog wrote:i was very impressed with litchfield!! finally hype that lives up to its billing..
-
- Posts: 339
- Joined: Thu Dec 14, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: north eastern MN