They Didn't. He is From Mankato West. Litchfield from MW.5th Line Center wrote:boblee wrote:Or he is talking about the player named Litchfield for Mankato West.5th Line Center wrote: Dog, either you are being sarcastic, or you meant to say that you were impressed with Mankato.How confusing! Why did they have to name their family the same as the town?!
Not impressed
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Re: post 10146
east hockey wrote:
Next time you start a thread, how about giving it a more descriptive title than "Not impressed"?
Lee


it's pretty tough coming up with something more descriptive after such in-depth analysis and breakdown of the players. That type of thought does stress the creative spirit.

fighting all who rob or plunder
-
- Posts: 822
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 11:01 pm
- Location: Rochester
It was a great game.
One thing I noticed when watching MW this year - they don't just shoot from the perimeter, hence, their shot totals are never that great. Shooting % has been good.
Two very good teams in the 1st game. I wish MW had won one for the South...had they capitalized a few times earlier and w/ the late PPs, they would have won. The 1st Marshall goal was a gift - ice the puck over the dots or off the glass - not up the slot!
I also thought 1-2 more penalties could've been called on DM when MW was on the PP in the 3rd....that is life. The Scarlets should have tied when they had the chance.
One thing I noticed when watching MW this year - they don't just shoot from the perimeter, hence, their shot totals are never that great. Shooting % has been good.
Two very good teams in the 1st game. I wish MW had won one for the South...had they capitalized a few times earlier and w/ the late PPs, they would have won. The 1st Marshall goal was a gift - ice the puck over the dots or off the glass - not up the slot!
I also thought 1-2 more penalties could've been called on DM when MW was on the PP in the 3rd....that is life. The Scarlets should have tied when they had the chance.
MAYO SPARTANS!