Parity Vs. Dynasty
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:15 pm
Parity Vs. Dynasty
What does everyone on the board like....do you want new teams making (and winning) the tournament every year (parity) or do you like the dynasties (pretty much the same powerhouses every year)?
If we didn't have conflict we'd all be pretty bored
-
- Posts: 7260
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm
Re: Parity Vs. Dynasty
If it's a choice of parity vs. dynasty I would take parity, which IMO is better for the growth of the sport as new teams/towns get to experience the excitement of the Tournament first hand. It also gives other teams and younger kids hope and enthusiasm if they believe they have a legitimate chance to get there.CityHockey11 wrote:What does everyone on the board like....do you want new teams making (and winning) the tournament every year (parity) or do you like the dynasties (pretty much the same powerhouses every year)?
Re: Parity Vs. Dynasty
This years examples:MNHockeyFan wrote:If it's a choice of parity vs. dynasty I would take parity, which IMO is better for the growth of the sport as new teams/towns get to experience the excitement of the Tournament first hand. It also gives other teams and younger kids hope and enthusiasm if they believe they have a legitimate chance to get there.CityHockey11 wrote:What does everyone on the board like....do you want new teams making (and winning) the tournament every year (parity) or do you like the dynasties (pretty much the same powerhouses every year)?
A
Mankato West
Litchfield/Dassel/Cokato
Cathedral...kinda. i know they've been there before but not with this group
AA
Lakeville South
CEC...again like Cathedral they've been there but not with the current kids