Parochial High School Sports League?

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

jancze5
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:11 pm

Parochial High School Sports League?

Post by jancze5 »

How far away are we from having an all-Parochial high school sports league in Minnesota?

We have our Districts and this would be one by itself..Hill Murray-Cretin-St Thomas-Breck-Blake-Shattuck St Mary's-St C C-Providence-Benilde, etc...

Any chance that ever happens?
New England Prep School Hockey Recruiter
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Been there done that.
pioneers
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: St Paul

Post by pioneers »

Give it a rest :roll:
Pioneers 1983, 1991 and 2008 State Champions
sachishi4
Posts: 1179
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 7:15 pm
Location: SLP

Post by sachishi4 »

:roll: :roll:
State ‘83, ‘91, ‘08, ‘20
pistol
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:31 pm

Post by pistol »

It is amazing how some people can come up with what they think are "new" ideas, when the same ideas have failed in the not so distant past.

We had two leagues before 1975, but only "mythical" champions.

In fact, the Pioneer Press used to call the #1 rated team, "Mythical State Hockey Champions."

#1 rated Hill would bounce #2 rated Edina in a "secret scrimmage" in the Seventies right before the Hornets would go on to win a no-Catholics-allowed MSHSL tourney. Duluth Cathedral would do much the same to the northern MSHSL champs of the Sixties.

By the early Seventies, scouts and sportswriters were applying the word "mythical" to the MSHSL tourney, too. The MSHSL had no choice but to give Hill-Murray its own section to keep up the tourney's credibility and prevent upsetting folks in the already more established sections (prior to Hill-Murray, section #3 had been used only for giving northern runners-up another chance to get in).

Try to get rid of the Catholics and again the public tourney will be labeled "mythical."
east hockey
Site Admin
Posts: 7428
Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2002 8:33 pm
Location: Proctor, MN

Post by east hockey »

pistol wrote:It is amazing how some people can come up with what they think are "new" ideas, when the same ideas have failed in the not so distant past.

We had two leagues before 1975, but only "mythical" champions.

In fact, the Pioneer Press used to call the #1 rated team, "Mythical State Hockey Champions."

#1 rated Hill would bounce #2 rated Edina in a "secret scrimmage" in the Seventies right before the Hornets would go on to win a no-Catholics-allowed MSHSL tourney. Duluth Cathedral would do much the same to the northern MSHSL champs of the Sixties.

By the early Seventies, scouts and sportswriters were applying the word "mythical" to the MSHSL tourney, too. The MSHSL had no choice but to give Hill-Murray its own section to keep up the tourney's credibility and prevent upsetting folks in the already more established sections (prior to Hill-Murray, section #3 had been used only for giving northern runners-up another chance to get in).

Try to get rid of the Catholics and again the public tourney will be labeled "mythical."
Or "refreshing". Take your pick.

Lee
PageStat Guy on Bluesky
CityHockey11
Posts: 77
Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 1:15 pm

Post by CityHockey11 »

or just plain real deal holyfield...sorry you've caught me hammered on Jack...truth comes out.. :twisted:
If we didn't have conflict we'd all be pretty bored
jancze5
Posts: 421
Joined: Sun Jan 07, 2007 3:11 pm

1975

Post by jancze5 »

Are you serious Pistol, 1975???? ....1975 was a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time ago. Sometimes looking to the past and developing a fresh perspective to correlate to current times with some retooling = success

In todays high school sports market, a parochial league makes sense..today, as in 2008, not waaaaaay back in 1975 when lets face it, life was a whole lot different.
New England Prep School Hockey Recruiter
MNHockeyFan
Posts: 7260
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm

Re: 1975

Post by MNHockeyFan »

jancze5 wrote:In todays high school sports market, a parochial league makes sense..today, as in 2008, not waaaaaay back in 1975 when lets face it, life was a whole lot different.
Why do you think having a separate league would make more sense now than it did in 1975?
High Flyer
Posts: 464
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:13 am

Re: Parochial High School Sports League?

Post by High Flyer »

jancze5 wrote:How far away are we from having an all-Parochial high school sports league in Minnesota?

We have our Districts and this would be one by itself..Hill Murray-Cretin-St Thomas-Breck-Blake-Shattuck St Mary's-St C C-Providence-Benilde, etc...

Any chance that ever happens?
I would love to see an all-Parochial Conference. What a great confernce schedule that would be. WOW!

When conference play is complete, place them in thier approiate sections for state tounament play offs.
DmanDad1980
Posts: 935
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 3:27 pm

Post by DmanDad1980 »

pistol wrote:It is amazing how some people can come up with what they think are "new" ideas, when the same ideas have failed in the not so distant past.

We had two leagues before 1975, but only "mythical" champions.

In fact, the Pioneer Press used to call the #1 rated team, "Mythical State Hockey Champions."

#1 rated Hill would bounce #2 rated Edina in a "secret scrimmage" in the Seventies right before the Hornets would go on to win a no-Catholics-allowed MSHSL tourney. Duluth Cathedral would do much the same to the northern MSHSL champs of the Sixties.

By the early Seventies, scouts and sportswriters were applying the word "mythical" to the MSHSL tourney, too. The MSHSL had no choice but to give Hill-Murray its own section to keep up the tourney's credibility and prevent upsetting folks in the already more established sections (prior to Hill-Murray, section #3 had been used only for giving northern runners-up another chance to get in).

Try to get rid of the Catholics and again the public tourney will be labeled "mythical."
But could then be termed "Ethical"... :shock:

Pistol, a piece of "humble pie" may be in order... We have all heard enough of the "mythical" Catholic Hockey History, time to move on... yawn...

jancze5: I don't think reverting to an old idea, especially this idea would fly today either. Parochial schools are entrenched in today's MSHSL very fiber, and they add a very valuable piece educationally and atheletically for our young scholar/athletes...
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

The problem is and always will be the flawed contention that the High School League's primary focus is to even out competitive sports. In fact, the prime directive is to allow kids to participate in sports. You guys worry too much about who wins and who loses. What matters is kids play, stay out of trouble and maybe learn something along the way. The league won't ever mandate all the private schools in one conference because it doesn't accomplish anything other than quieting the fringe critics. Conferences are primarily based on geography first and school size second. This won't be changing any time soon. So while it is fun to speculate on what you think would be a great overhaul of conferences and sections, this doesn't lead to anything applicable in the real world. You may go back to pretending now...
RLStars
Posts: 1417
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 4:14 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Re: 1975

Post by RLStars »

jancze5 wrote:Are you serious Pistol, 1975???? ....1975 was a LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOONG time ago. Sometimes looking to the past and developing a fresh perspective to correlate to current times with some retooling = success

In todays high school sports market, a parochial league makes sense..today, as in 2008, not waaaaaay back in 1975 when lets face it, life was a whole lot different.
HS Sports market? Hmmm................. :-k

Definition: The concept of a market is any structure that allows buyers and sellers to exchange any goods, services and information.

High School sports doesn't quite fit into that definition. Maybe thats the problem, to many people think it does. :roll:
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

With regards to private schools, there are those that believe, "If ya can't beat em, boot em." There are those that believe, "If you can't beat em, join em." Then there are those that believe, "If you can't beat em, try harder." I just enjoy the fact that private schools evoke so many different thoughts & feelings from so many people. :wink:
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

Pioneerprideguy wrote:With regards to private schools, there are those that believe, "If ya can't beat em, boot em." There are those that believe, "If you can't beat em, join em." Then there are those that believe, "If you can't beat em, try harder." I just enjoy the fact that private schools evoke so many different thoughts & feelings from so many people. :wink:
Like this one " Who Cares" :P
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER
Posts: 632
Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:54 pm

Post by ACTUALFORMERPLAYER »

I am just happy the private schools lower themselves to play the public schools. With their high standards academically and extracurricularly it probably has a negative effect on their development to play a public school. :roll:
sideways
Posts: 46
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2007 3:28 pm

Post by sideways »

[quote="ACTUALFORMERPLAYER"]I am just happy the private schools lower themselves to play the public schools. With their high standards academically and extracurricularly it probably has a negative effect on their development to play a public school. :roll:[/quote]
Can't Never Tried
Posts: 4345
Joined: Thu Sep 14, 2006 3:55 pm

Post by Can't Never Tried »

sideways wrote:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I am just happy the private schools lower themselves to play the public schools. With their high standards academically and extracurricularly it probably has a negative effect on their development to play a public school. :roll:
Someone else recently said that too :?
Sparlimb
Posts: 2727
Joined: Tue Feb 05, 2002 7:11 am

Post by Sparlimb »

Can't Never Tried wrote:
sideways wrote:
ACTUALFORMERPLAYER wrote:I am just happy the private schools lower themselves to play the public schools. With their high standards academically and extracurricularly it probably has a negative effect on their development to play a public school. :roll:
Someone else recently said that too :?
You can say that again.
pistol
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:31 pm

Post by pistol »

1974

You really want to go back to the way things were in 1974?

Two high school leagues; energy crisis; long gas lines; inflation; people wanting change so badly that they were willing to try any stupid idea... "Hey, I'm tired of getting my refreshments from the fridge. Let's try what's in those bottles under the sink for a change."

You want 1974? Here's what it was really like:

Edina went undefeated, winning the MSHSL tourney, never having faced the three best players in the state.

Why?

Because the the top scouting prospects were all playing in the State Independent Hockey Tournament:

1. Rob Larson of STA
2. Kevin Nugent of Hill-Murray
3. Dan Hoene of Duluth Cathedral
Don Riley
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:29 pm

Post by Don Riley »

My eye in the sky tells me you don't know anything about hockey or the Seventies. Where do you get your information? From Ankles Pierre, Jr.?

My eye in the sky checked all the MSHSL records and Ross Bernstein's books, and there is no record of any Rob Larson.

Who said Rob Larson was the best Minnesota high school hockey prospect in 1974?
pistol
Posts: 354
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 3:31 pm

Post by pistol »

Herb Brooks
Hockeyguy_27
Posts: 745
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 10:19 pm

Post by Hockeyguy_27 »

pistol wrote:Herb Brooks
And then there was silence! :lol:
pioneers
Posts: 967
Joined: Mon Nov 20, 2006 12:05 pm
Location: St Paul

Post by pioneers »

Don Riley wrote:My eye in the sky tells me you don't know anything about hockey or the Seventies. Where do you get your information? From Ankles Pierre, Jr.?

My eye in the sky checked all the MSHSL records and Ross Bernstein's books, and there is no record of any Rob Larson.

Who said Rob Larson was the best Minnesota high school hockey prospect in 1974?
Being that they were not members of the MSHSL at the time, no surprise that there was no record of them there.
Pioneers 1983, 1991 and 2008 State Champions
Neutron 14
Posts: 5339
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:48 pm

Post by Neutron 14 »

Don Riley wrote:My eye in the sky tells me you don't know anything about hockey or the Seventies. Where do you get your information? From Ankles Pierre, Jr.?

My eye in the sky checked all the MSHSL records and Ross Bernstein's books, and there is no record of any Rob Larson.

Who said Rob Larson was the best Minnesota high school hockey prospect in 1974?
This was smooth pistol. Well done. :lol:
Locked