freshman varsity hockey players
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:32 am
freshman varsity hockey players
who will make significant contributions to their respective club?
-
- Posts: 1788
- Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am
It's tough for a Sophomore to make an impact at the varsity level. It's very rare that a freshman can come along and be a significant contributor.
Frankly, I think the Freshman varsity prospect should be with his buddies in bantams .............. that is if the kid is within bantam eligibility range.
Life is short, many people try to rush things along.
Frankly, I think the Freshman varsity prospect should be with his buddies in bantams .............. that is if the kid is within bantam eligibility range.
Life is short, many people try to rush things along.
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:13 am
Re: freshman varsity hockey players
F-Travis Boyd/Hopkins (again)RushnCircles wrote:who will make significant contributions to their respective club?
F-Nate Trina/Breck
F-Charlie Klos/Waconia
D-Eric Schurhamer/STA
D-Tanner Jordon/Mahtomedi
D-Austin Rudnick/Champlin Park
Last edited by High Flyer on Wed Nov 12, 2008 9:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 4:28 pm
no but they are related and craig was a hell of a hockey player i actually read an article about the team he lead to state todaywbmd wrote:Is that Craig Mack's son?nipe'n wrote:Cory Mack from East Grand Forks is a freshman and after hearing some of his bantam numbers and his aggression on the ice he will be someone to watch in the north
-
- Posts: 1548
- Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
- Contact:
Have to agree with gopher blog. If the player is strong enough to play (take Travis Boyd for example) and make an impact, he would be wasting his time playing Bantams. If the player is going to sit, probably better to play another year of Bantams and be the team leader. You definitely get better by playing better competition and playing WITH better players. If your goal is college hockey or beyond, go for it and play at the highest level you can!! "If he has the ability and the desire to do it, he may as well play" Really well said!
-
- Posts: 118
- Joined: Wed Nov 21, 2007 11:32 am
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
If they have the strength/ability is the big question. If playing at the varsity level significantly reduces the amount of time a kid has the puck on his stick it can be counter productive as well. Every year there will be a few players that can make the leap but it can be a lost year for those that are not ready. A weak varsity program isn't a good enough reason to make the jump. You can argue the point from either side ... Zack Buddish played bantams..didn't seem to slow his development. Schroeder and Boyd skipped them all together. If you can't DOMINATE in bantams why move up?
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:13 am
-
- Posts: 129
- Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 3:05 pm
- Location: The sin bin
Rudnik
I think Rudnik is now going to Breck.
I think Bantam hockey can absolutely be counter-productive if you are truly Varsity ready and can make an impact at the higher level. Zach obviously wanted to play with his buddies but they didn't even win the Bantam A tournament that year - the whole reason the group chose to stay together I would guess. How much better could he have been had he skipped that Bantam year (which just had to be a joke for him) and played HS? I also think the Edina Varsity was pretty weak that year if I recall so it may not have had the attraction that the possiblity of winning the Bantam championship did and that may have factored in the decision!
Boyd definitely made an impact on Hopkins and is still only in 9th grade. Schroeder always played at the highest level he could and I bet he's pretty darn happy with the way it worked out. Both those guys are going to be big names (already are!). How many guys who played their last year of Bantams instead of moving up, are ahead because of it? They probably enjoyed playing with the buddies, but did it improve their development more than a year on Varsity- you'd have to show me an example of one. Guess it depends on your end goal.
Boyd definitely made an impact on Hopkins and is still only in 9th grade. Schroeder always played at the highest level he could and I bet he's pretty darn happy with the way it worked out. Both those guys are going to be big names (already are!). How many guys who played their last year of Bantams instead of moving up, are ahead because of it? They probably enjoyed playing with the buddies, but did it improve their development more than a year on Varsity- you'd have to show me an example of one. Guess it depends on your end goal.
-
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:50 am
I think both Boyd and Schroeder are the exception not the norm. By passing on your second bantam year you give up a lot of experience in situations you most likely wont play in at the HS level. I think if you can get a regular shift (top 6 forward or top 4 d) you jump. If not, stay play every situation possible and start your HS career as a sophmore. All in all there are very few players that fall into the counter productive category...Doglover wrote:I think Bantam hockey can absolutely be counter-productive if you are truly Varsity ready and can make an impact at the higher level. Zach obviously wanted to play with his buddies but they didn't even win the Bantam A tournament that year - the whole reason the group chose to stay together I would guess. How much better could he have been had he skipped that Bantam year (which just had to be a joke for him) and played HS? I also think the Edina Varsity was pretty weak that year if I recall so it may not have had the attraction that the possiblity of winning the Bantam championship did and that may have factored in the decision!
Boyd definitely made an impact on Hopkins and is still only in 9th grade. Schroeder always played at the highest level he could and I bet he's pretty darn happy with the way it worked out. Both those guys are going to be big names (already are!). How many guys who played their last year of Bantams instead of moving up, are ahead because of it? They probably enjoyed playing with the buddies, but did it improve their development more than a year on Varsity- you'd have to show me an example of one. Guess it depends on your end goal.
-
- Posts: 1102
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2007 2:07 pm
Re: freshman varsity hockey players
traina will not make that much of a contribution to breck. he's a very good player but they enough depth at forward that a freshman won't play very much.High Flyer wrote:F-Travis Boyd/Hopkins (again)RushnCircles wrote:who will make significant contributions to their respective club?
F-Nate Trina/Breck
F-Charlie Klos/Waconia
D-Eric Schurhamer/STA
D-Tanner Jordon/Mahtomedi
D-Austin Rudnick/Champlin Park
rudnick is at breck, his size should make it easier for him to adapt to the high school level and he could very well make a contribution
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:31 am
-
- Posts: 348
- Joined: Sun Dec 11, 2005 10:24 pm
- Location: Northern Southern Minnesota
I think all three of these boys are sophomores... but I think they will all be able to contribute to their respective teams.Cardiackid wrote:I would add Dillon Stolt of Albert Lea as well as Austin Head of Dodge County very good players. Don't forget Zach Hoffman of New Ulm he is a very talented d-man with good size.
Stolt has a little buddy down there in AL that could be a freshman that contributes at the varsity level this year.
Don't sweat the small stuff.
It's all small stuff.
It's all small stuff.
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:13 am
Re: freshman varsity hockey players
High Flyer wrote:F-Travis Boyd/Hopkins (again)RushnCircles wrote:who will make significant contributions to their respective club?
F-Nate Trina/Breck
F-Charlie Klos/Waconia
F-Austin Young/SSP
D-Eric Schurhamer/STA
D-Tanner Jordon/Mahtomedi
D-Austin Rudnick/Breck
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2008 11:31 am
-
- Posts: 32
- Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:05 pm
Re: freshman varsity hockey players
The parents at Breck tell me that he will be the top freshman forward and possibly a strong second line player.mch wrote: traina will not make that much of a contribution to breck. he's a very good player but they enough depth at forward that a freshman won't play very much.