WBL vs Moorhead
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:59 am
My guess....
How about against South on Friday first.... if they split on this trip I think it would be a good weekend. My guess is they beat South, and Lose to the spuds!
-
- Posts: 651
- Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:41 pm
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 9:59 am
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm
-
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 3:54 pm
-
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Lakeville
im not trying to rip on anyone here at all so dont take this the wrong way. i will admit my ignorance about the moorhead hockey program but why do you think they will beat WB? just out of curiosity? i dont know much about them except what i saw last year so...just wondering(not being sarcastic or mean or anything honestly asking)HappyHockeyFan wrote:I say WB over South and Lose to the Spuds in a nailbiter
losing is still far from optional
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:15 pm
Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote:Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.PuckPatrol wrote:Keep dreaming...... Last time they went up north they got beat by both!
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
HockeyHigh wrote:Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote:Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.PuckPatrol wrote:Keep dreaming...... Last time they went up north they got beat by both!
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
do you know who owen collette is? yah...good luck on a high scoring game for moorhead on that one...ignorance
losing is still far from optional
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:15 pm
I don't know how that's ignorant in any way? Don't teams usually win by getting the most goals? I do also believe that White Bear will beat Moorhead because they lack defensive power, so go figure.B wrote:HockeyHigh wrote:Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote: Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
do you know who owen collette is? yah...good luck on a high scoring game for moorhead on that one...ignorance
Last edited by HockeyHigh on Wed Dec 03, 2008 9:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Big bark b..............do you know where Fargo is?????B wrote:HockeyHigh wrote:Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote: Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
do you know who owen collette is? yah...good luck on a high scoring game for moorhead on that one...ignorance
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:15 pm
Don't need to factor in the 4-5 hour bus ride, or the fact that they play Fargo South the night before they play Moorhead.defense wrote:Big bark b..............do you know where Fargo is?????B wrote:HockeyHigh wrote: Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
do you know who owen collette is? yah...good luck on a high scoring game for moorhead on that one...ignorance

No, I was just really wondering if he knew where Fargo was......HockeyHigh wrote:Don't need to factor in the 4-5 hour bus ride, or the fact that they play Fargo South the night before they play Moorhead.defense wrote:Big bark b..............do you know where Fargo is?????B wrote:
do you know who owen collette is? yah...good luck on a high scoring game for moorhead on that one...ignorance
-
- Posts: 128
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2007 6:15 pm
It's that fictional town in that one murder/comedy movie, I believe it was taped in Minneapolis and its suburbs.defense wrote:No, I was just really wondering if he knew where Fargo was......HockeyHigh wrote:Don't need to factor in the 4-5 hour bus ride, or the fact that they play Fargo South the night before they play Moorhead.defense wrote: Big bark b..............do you know where Fargo is?????
ya, ya bet it is...HockeyHigh wrote:It's that fictional town in that one murder/comedy movie, I believe it was taped in Minneapolis and its suburbs.defense wrote:No, I was just really wondering if he knew where Fargo was......HockeyHigh wrote: Don't need to factor in the 4-5 hour bus ride, or the fact that they play Fargo South the night before they play Moorhead.
-
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 4:48 pm
In order for Moorhead to "score the most", they'll have to score on Collette. He was great last year, really tearing it up in the section tournament, and has picked up right where he left off. The only reason this game will be any sort of "battle", or be close at all, is due to a tired Bears offense not tallying as many as they could on fresh legs. Should be a great weekend for the Bears.HockeyHigh wrote:Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote:Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.PuckPatrol wrote:Keep dreaming...... Last time they went up north they got beat by both!
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.
-
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:35 pm
i think that B was trying to say that....you cant score on owen collette!!!specialblend wrote:In order for Moorhead to "score the most", they'll have to score on Collette. He was great last year, really tearing it up in the section tournament, and has picked up right where he left off. The only reason this game will be any sort of "battle", or be close at all, is due to a tired Bears offense not tallying as many as they could on fresh legs. Should be a great weekend for the Bears.HockeyHigh wrote:Fargo South beat WBL the first time they played them in Fargo. Last year South lost to WBL 6-1 and Moorhead 7 to zip. This year South tied Moorhead, and Moorhead didn't even have to make the 4 hour trip.specialblend wrote: Perhaps, but the Bears obliterated FS last year at Aldrich, 6-1. Don't try and tell me that home ice will account for 5 goals. In a much closer contest, the Bears took down the Spuds last year in OT, 6-5.
South has a chance because of their defense and their goaltender. South's goalie alone won't let in more than 3 goals on 40 shots. Spuds on the other hand seem too offensively minded, and their goalie seemed relatively weak. The South game will be very low score because of this, whereas the WBL/Moorhead game will end up in an offensive battle of who scores the most.