Breck vs Blake (01/29/09)

gertbeef · Post by **gertbeef** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 1:50 pm

Who you got?

hshckfan08 · Post by **hshckfan08** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:03 pm

This will not be close, even if it is a rivalry game. Breck in running time.

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:08 pm

hshckfan08 wrote:This will not be close, even if it is a rivalry game. Breck in running time.

History says this one will be close.

mch · Post by **mch** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:31 pm

will this be televised?

starmvp · Post by **starmvp** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:53 pm

mch wrote:will this be televised?

I believe it will be televised on FSN.

Goldy23 · Post by **Goldy23** » Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:58 pm

8-1 Mustangs by a touchdown!

Doglover · Post by **Doglover** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:45 am

I think in rivalry games, all bets are off. This might be fun to watch. I love the underdog - GO BEARS - RIDE THE MUSTANGS!

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:21 am

starmvp wrote:
mch wrote:will this be televised?
I believe it will be televised on FSN.

Yep scheduled for FSN. should be a good game to watch.

hockeyrocks · Post by **hockeyrocks** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 1:52 pm

Doglover wrote:I think in rivalry games, all bets are off. This might be fun to watch. I love the underdog - GO BEARS - RIDE THE MUSTANGS!

Breck hasn't lost a game since the Schwann's cup and dominated a better Orono squad on Tuesday night. I don't think this is going to be close. The only reason it's not a laugher is because it's at the Blake old barn! Should be a fun game to catch on TV! Breck 6-2

starmvp · Post by **starmvp** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 2:29 pm

Breck takes this one 6-1

mch · Post by **mch** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 7:49 pm

why is doerring playing forward?

pipes3030 · Post by **pipes3030** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:44 pm

mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?

The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?

scoreboard33 · Post by **scoreboard33** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:44 pm

mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?

Wondering the same thing, then on the powerplay, they put him and Brunette at the point, kinda weird.

Hockeyguy_27 · Post by **Hockeyguy_27** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:39 pm

pipes3030 wrote:
mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?

The Bears need another Kent Patterson! Yikes.

pipes3030 · Post by **pipes3030** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:46 pm

Hockeyguy_27 wrote:
pipes3030 wrote:
mch wrote:why is doerring playing forward?
The better question might be why did Hayes start in nets over Oncay?
The Bears need another Kent Patterson! Yikes.

Haha yes, though it seems like they are in a greater need of some offense first. You won't win any games when you don't score, no matter how many goals the tenders let in.

hshckfan08 · Post by **hshckfan08** » Thu Jan 29, 2009 9:48 pm

6-0 final.
Running Time

hockeyboys · Post by **hockeyboys** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 7:46 am

I was surprised Doering was at Forward too. Did he play forward the entire game? He is still listed as a D on the MN Hockey Hub:

http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/divi ... position=D

RK PLAYER TEAM POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PPG PPA SHG SHA GWG SHOTS SPCT
1 Herd, Reid BRE D 18 7 13 20 +2 12 1 3 1 0 0 2 3.500
2 Trevathan, James SPA D 18 6 12 18 0 32 3 5 0 1 1 0 .000
Doerring, Blake BLK D 16 3 15 18 +5 28 1 2 0 0 0 4 .750

power92 · Post by **power92** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 12:47 pm

hockeyboys wrote:I was surprised Doering was at Forward too. Did he play forward the entire game? He is still listed as a D on the MN Hockey Hub:

http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/divi ... position=D

RK PLAYER TEAM POS GP G A PTS +/- PIM PPG PPA SHG SHA GWG SHOTS SPCT
1 Herd, Reid BRE D 18 7 13 20 +2 12 1 3 1 0 0 2 3.500
2 Trevathan, James SPA D 18 6 12 18 0 32 3 5 0 1 1 0 .000
Doerring, Blake BLK D 16 3 15 18 +5 28 1 2 0 0 0 4 .750

He has been playing forward since the Johnson game. Plays the point on special teams.