Bears vs Mustangs 1/31

blanco oso · Post by **blanco oso** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:49 am

WBL vs Moundsview saturday at Aldrich Arena.
the puck drops at 3:00
2-1 victory for the bears last time they met. whats gonna happen this time around?

Elvis · Post by **Elvis** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:12 pm

Thought you meant Blake vs. Breck! Using that game for an indicator, I'm taking the Mustangs.

prospector · Post by **prospector** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 6:50 pm

MV goalie Culver, is suppose to be back... he is pretty tight in net, the team has been better scoring lately. last meeting almost went into OT.. It should be a good one

blanco oso · Post by **blanco oso** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:48 pm

prospector wrote:MV goalie Culver, is suppose to be back... he is pretty tight in net, the team has been better scoring lately. last meeting almost went into OT.. It should be a good one

almost...

Hockeyfan#8 · Post by **Hockeyfan#8** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:10 pm

THe Bears are coming off of a big win and should ride the confidents for another big win

White Bear 5
Mounds View 1

oldtimehockeyguy · Post by **oldtimehockeyguy** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:26 pm

I do like the Mv goalie but the stangs do not have a chance. 7-2 WB even if the goalie stands on his head. The goalie need a little support. he will stop the first one but after that he needs the team to help.

prospector · Post by **prospector** » Fri Jan 30, 2009 10:43 pm

no doubt WB is a better team but 7-2 strange since their last meeting was 2-1 and MV has been in most of their games lots of losses but very close

ImissMYhockey · Post by **ImissMYhockey** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 1:32 am

First off, the MV goalie is OK, not that great.He needs to stop the easy ones and cut down on the bad goals before he can be considered good.
Secondly, WBL has won their last 2 games by good margins...sooo a bad game has to be coming.
Thirdly, MV is constantly dominated by WBL in hockey year in and year out. I think MV is sick of this and that this is the game where they turn it around. MV knows that this game is big, to help out their section seeding. Some of these players have never beaten WB and this is possibly their last chance, I think they will take advantage of that.
MV in OT only because for a majority of games for MV this season, 3 periods doesn't seem to be enough.

hockeyxfan01 · Post by **hockeyxfan01** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:02 am

It's interesting how Mounds View considers this to be a sort of rivalry, while White Bear looks at it as just another game. This would be a big win for Mounds View, but WBL knows they need to win almost all of the remaining games to get a high seed, and I don't think the Mustangs will be able to pull it off.

WBL 5
MV 3

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:40 am

hockeyxfan01 wrote:It's interesting how Mounds View considers this to be a sort of rivalry, while White Bear looks at it as just another game. This would be a big win for Mounds View, but WBL knows they need to win almost all of the remaining games to get a high seed, and I don't think the Mustangs will be able to pull it off.

WBL 5
MV 3

I think some of the football rivalry carries over, Bears by 3.

hartyy56 · Post by **hartyy56** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:14 am

I'm expecting a repeat of the roseville game for the stangs!
Mounds view comes off with the win on OT.

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 11:44 am

I saw only the first period vs Park. I think all three top lines are flying right now, and Mounds View won't know what him them. of course last game, MV didn't have their #1 D-man and Osborne, but, they don't have any snipers, and snipers are the only ones who can score on my bud Collette. Bears 4-1.

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:30 pm

7-0 Bears, final.

biscuit in the basket · Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:35 pm

formerlybackofnet wrote:7-0 Bears, final.

Who got the shutout for the Bears and the goals?

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 5:40 pm

biscuit in the basket wrote:
formerlybackofnet wrote:7-0 Bears, final.
Who got the shutout for the Bears and the goals?

Collett in gaol, Birkinbine Hatrick!

hockeyxfan01 · Post by **hockeyxfan01** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 6:32 pm

formerlybackofnet wrote:
biscuit in the basket wrote:
formerlybackofnet wrote:7-0 Bears, final.
Who got the shutout for the Bears and the goals?
Collett in gaol, Birkinbine Hatrick!

I think it was Wahlin who got the hat trick

WBLHockeyfan04 · Post by **WBLHockeyfan04** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:34 pm

The Bears are starting to get hot now!

blanco oso · Post by **blanco oso** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 7:40 pm

collette in goal

birkinbine-2
wallin-3
dolfay-1
slator-1

the bears have outscored their opponents 20-3 in their last three games. with rumors of zepeda possibly beaing out do we have state team on our hands here?

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sat Jan 31, 2009 10:35 pm

blanco oso wrote:collette in goal

birkinbine-2
wallin-3
dolfay-1
slator-1

the bears have outscored their opponents 20-3 in their last three games. with rumors of zepeda possibly beaing out do we have state team on our hands here?

http://mbhsh.stats.pointstreak.com/boxs ... eid=879385

oldtimehockeyguy · Post by **oldtimehockeyguy** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 2:28 pm

prospector wrote:no doubt WB is a better team but 7-2 strange since their last meeting was 2-1 and MV has been in most of their games lots of losses but very close

I was close. I thought 7-2 but it ended up 7-0. I caught part of the game. The mv goalie did not have a chance. Back door goals most of the game. He did not have a chance. No goalie could have stopped their attack. The good news for mv is that it could have been much worse. The goalie made some great saves in the 3rd.

It looks like the parent and players have reached their limit regarding this team. I heard parents yelling at the coaching staff during the game.

prospector · Post by **prospector** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 6:22 pm

oldtimehockeyguy wrote:
prospector wrote:no doubt WB is a better team but 7-2 strange since their last meeting was 2-1 and MV has been in most of their games lots of losses but very close
I was close. I thought 7-2 but it ended up 7-0. I caught part of the game. The mv goalie did not have a chance. Back door goals most of the game. He did not have a chance. No goalie could have stopped their attack. The good news for mv is that it could have been much worse. The goalie made some great saves in the 3rd.

It looks like the parent and players have reached their limit regarding this team. I heard parents yelling at the coaching staff during the game.

well the parents are justified when you keep players on the ice for 2 min or more over and over the get gassed and then give up in the end cuz they cant keep going, these players are not capable of that and no one is for that matt,,,,er maybe he shoud do some coaching clinics so he understands what to do this man isnt capable of coaching at this level yet give him a squirt team

TheNightman · Post by **TheNightman** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:24 pm

prospector wrote:
oldtimehockeyguy wrote:
prospector wrote:no doubt WB is a better team but 7-2 strange since their last meeting was 2-1 and MV has been in most of their games lots of losses but very close
I was close. I thought 7-2 but it ended up 7-0. I caught part of the game. The mv goalie did not have a chance. Back door goals most of the game. He did not have a chance. No goalie could have stopped their attack. The good news for mv is that it could have been much worse. The goalie made some great saves in the 3rd.

It looks like the parent and players have reached their limit regarding this team. I heard parents yelling at the coaching staff during the game.
well the parents are justified when you keep players on the ice for 2 min or more over and over the get gassed and then give up in the end cuz they cant keep going, these players are not capable of that and no one is for that matt,,,,er maybe he shoud do some coaching clinics so he understands what to do this man isnt capable of coaching at this level yet give him a squirt team

Goldsmith is a good player but as far as I'm aware he's no Scott Niedermayer, that coach has to give the kid a rest.

prospector · Post by **prospector** » Sun Feb 01, 2009 11:31 pm

as far as ive heard its not Goldsmiths fault he heads to the bench and the coach says no and that filters all the way down the BENCH and int the locker room

flatontheice · Post by **flatontheice** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 3:53 pm

blanco oso wrote:collette in goal

birkinbine-2
wallin-3
dolfay-1
slator-1

the bears have outscored their opponents 20-3 in their last three games. with rumors of zepeda possibly beaing out do we have state team on our hands here?

Is Zepeda leaving now? Waterloo?

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Mon Feb 02, 2009 8:05 pm

flatontheice wrote:
blanco oso wrote:collette in goal

birkinbine-2
wallin-3
dolfay-1
slator-1

the bears have outscored their opponents 20-3 in their last three games. with rumors of zepeda possibly beaing out do we have state team on our hands here?
Is Zepeda leaving now? Waterloo?

No

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Bears vs Mustangs 1/31

Who Wins?

Bears vs Mustangs 1/31

Mounds Views has a good Chance

Re: Mounds Views has a good Chance

Re: Mounds Views has a good Chance