Net Movement

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Net Movement

Post by BodyShots »

How many times can a goalie move the net during play before a delay of game penalty should be called?

I saw a game last night, where every time the goalie slid side-to-side, he would slide into the pipe and move the net. I would love to see the posts go deeper into the ice to prevent this non-sense.

Your thoughts?
SEMNHOCKEYFAN
Posts: 381
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 11:56 pm

Post by SEMNHOCKEYFAN »

I remember a game a few years ago when it was mayo-jm and mayo kept getting chances down in the jm end and every time it would seem that the net would just happen to come off....i beleve mayo lost that game like 2-1 but i beleve that if it becomes consistant that the refs should call a penalty r something along that line.....
seek & destroy
Posts: 328
Joined: Wed Jul 23, 2008 2:38 pm

Re: Net Movement

Post by seek & destroy »

BodyShots wrote:How many times can a goalie move the net during play before a delay of game penalty should be called?

I saw a game last night, where every time the goalie slid side-to-side, he would slide into the pipe and move the net. I would love to see the posts go deeper into the ice to prevent this non-sense.

Your thoughts?
I agree that it is frustrating when goalies deliberately knock the net off. It usually happens when there is intense pressure in the zone and takes away chances for scoring and, more importantly, excitement for the fans. My feeling is that refs should give warnings and then call a penalty when it becomes evident that it is happening to often and with deliberate intentions. Most coaches can see it when it is obvious and so do the fans so you know it must be somewhat obvious to the refs as well.

However, I don't like the idea of having posts go deeper. I have seen many players flying at full speed into the pipe and the idea of having more resistance when they hit it would not be good. Injuries would increase and there is no need to have more injuries just to solve a problem that can be handled by refs (and goalies) being more aware of knocking the net off.
Rossbury21
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:44 am
Location: BSU/Twin Cities

Post by Rossbury21 »

I think they should mandate a change to the rubber stoppers during games that most College and Professional teams now do...they require a little more work during intermission, but it is so much more effective, because the net will never be slightly off, if it gets nudged it will just move right back in.

The Problem with calling a penalty however is it is a judgement call, one ref will call it more then another.
youngblood08
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm

Post by youngblood08 »

Seen as you are a WBL fan and have been to every game this year, you must be talking about thier game last night?

Don't recall a huge number of times the net was off by just the goalies movement alone. Maybe 2-3 but nothing that looked intentional
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

Rossbury21 wrote:I think they should mandate a change to the rubber stoppers during games that most College and Professional teams now do...they require a little more work during intermission, but it is so much more effective, because the net will never be slightly off, if it gets nudged it will just move right back in.

The Problem with calling a penalty however is it is a judgement call, one ref will call it more then another.


Isn't every penalty a judgement call? :wink:
got some
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by got some »

youngblood08 wrote:Seen as you are a WBL fan and have been to every game this year, you must be talking about thier game last night?

Don't recall a huge number of times the net was off by just the goalies movement alone. Maybe 2-3 but nothing that looked intentional

There wasn't too much net movement. As you said, it happened about 3 times. However, each one was clearly intentional.
Zamman
Posts: 2106
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2002 1:15 pm
Location: Edina

Post by Zamman »

Rossbury21 wrote:I think they should mandate a change to the rubber stoppers during games that most College and Professional teams now do...they require a little more work during intermission, but it is so much more effective, because the net will never be slightly off, if it gets nudged it will just move right back in.

The Problem with calling a penalty however is it is a judgement call, one ref will call it more then another.
A lot of rinks cannot change to the rubber pegs. That would mean drilling holes in concrete, which would cause stress fractures in the flooring. In our rink we have a sand floor and the holes would just keep expanding or cave in. Not to mention that our pipes are just below the ice surface.

Another point should be that people need to properly peg nets after the ice is made. I see most rinks and players kneel down and bang the peg into the ice then set the net on top of it. I was taught many years ago to take the peg, lift the net, set the peg in the pipe and drop the net. That causes enough pressure to sink the spike and the end of the peg. i do not see many nets moving off when this is done.
youngblood08
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm

Post by youngblood08 »

The refs were to busy watching the WBL hacks dive tackle the players already down on the ice. Like the one #7 performed in the 2nd period and that wasn't the only time it was performed.
Rossbury21
Posts: 308
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 10:44 am
Location: BSU/Twin Cities

Post by Rossbury21 »

Zamman wrote: A lot of rinks cannot change to the rubber pegs. That would mean drilling holes in concrete, which would cause stress fractures in the flooring. In our rink we have a sand floor and the holes would just keep expanding or cave in. Not to mention that our pipes are just below the ice surface.
Are you thinking about the bigger pegs that they have at places like the Ex? There is a type that is smaller and can be drilled into only the ice...they have them here at BSU's rink and they work very well. Then after the games they can use the metal pegs for practice.
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Net Movement

Post by wbmd »

BodyShots wrote:How many times can a goalie move the net during play before a delay of game penalty should be called?

I saw a game last night, where every time the goalie slid side-to-side, he would slide into the pipe and move the net. I would love to see the posts go deeper into the ice to prevent this non-sense.

Your thoughts?
Safety issues is one of the main reasons the longer post was eliminated.

Former Hill-Murray defenseman Ben Belde was injured badly as a freshman at the U of M ('80-81 season) due to the longer posts.
woodley
Posts: 162
Joined: Thu Nov 22, 2007 8:14 am

Re: Net Movement

Post by woodley »

BodyShots wrote:How many times can a goalie move the net during play before a delay of game penalty should be called?

I saw a game last night, where every time the goalie slid side-to-side, he would slide into the pipe and move the net. I would love to see the posts go deeper into the ice to prevent this non-sense.

Your thoughts?
When a goalie makes a pad slide, he will often use the post to stop his momentum while still keeping the pad flat on the ice. This stops him from overplaying the shooter and opening up the back side. If the net isn't pegged properly, it comes off. There are many things in the game that cause a stoppage. This just happens to be one of them. . .

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not saying the tender shouldn't get penalized if he does the Turco shoulder shrug, but come on, if he is making a full speed move on the ice in response to a play, get over it!
blanco oso
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am

Post by blanco oso »

youngblood08 wrote:Seen as you are a WBL fan and have been to every game this year, you must be talking about thier game last night?

Don't recall a huge number of times the net was off by just the goalies movement alone. Maybe 2-3 but nothing that looked intentional
except all three times the puck was being batted around in front of the net and WB was about to score...its BS I say. at least one would have made its way in if it wasnt for Stillwaters goalie "accidentally" running into the posts
Land Of The Free, Home Of The BEARS
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

I see a lot of good comments and suggestions offered.

1. I realize the change was made for safety and I agree with that.
2. I am not saying this only happened last night. I see this same issue at all of the games and our goalie included
3. I just think there should be some kind of process/order adheared to by the official. 1st time - no comment, 2nd time - a warning, 3rd time - a penalty

Lets admit that hockey is at its most exciting time when a team puts a lot of pressue in the offenseive zone and creates many scoring opportunities. I am just frustrated that this excitement get killed by a net being dislodged from its proper location. If a skater does it, that is one thing, but when the goaltender does it repeatedly with just a slide across the crease, then that has be be dealt with by the officiating, or some other method for securing the nets.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Re: Net Movement

Post by Goldfishdude »

[
Former Hill-Murray defenseman Ben Belde was injured badly as a freshman at the U of M ('80-81 season) due to the longer posts.[/quote]

Who incidentally, I saw at the WBL/Stillwater game. His son is a 10th grade defenseman for Stillwater JV, and plays similar as Ben in skating ability, just not the toughness. Ben and I went to grade school together, and Ben and Coach Tim Sager for WBL were rivals and stud players in the Catholic Athletic Association in the day. Just some trivia.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Net Movement

Post by BodyShots »

Goldfishdude wrote:[
Former Hill-Murray defenseman Ben Belde was injured badly as a freshman at the U of M ('80-81 season) due to the longer posts.
Who incidentally, I saw at the WBL/Stillwater game. His son is a 10th grade defenseman for Stillwater JV, and plays similar as Ben in skating ability, just not the toughness. Ben and I went to grade school together, and Ben and Coach Tim Sager for WBL were rivals and stud players in the Catholic Athletic Association in the day. Just some trivia.[/quote]

Cracker Jack is right up their with Sid Hartman. Everybody is a close personal friend. :lol:
TheBlizzard
Posts: 78
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 12:43 pm

Post by TheBlizzard »

I just think refs need to watch this more closely, the same as they would interference or holding out front. If the puck is in front of the net and the net keeps popping off they need to pay attention.

The last game I was at the net had to get knocked off around 8 times for the one team and zero for the other. Just so happens it was on a break away, puck in front of the net, or a rebound.

But as was stated earlier, there has to be a regard for saftey. I don't think longer posts is the answer for saftey reasons, it just needs to be closely watched to see if the goal is getting knocked off intentially.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

Body Shots?? You can't get the scoops without getting close to the team.... It's almost like trying to hang with the band, but ya gotta bring your own pink guitar
Marty McSorely
Posts: 284
Joined: Thu Sep 27, 2007 8:01 am

Problem

Post by Marty McSorely »

This isn't necessarily a goalie issue. With the way the game has developed and strength of goalies the midget pegs are not sufficient anymore.

Back in the days of the fat kid playing goalie they worked fine. Today's tenders are much stronger and push harder then ever before. USA hockey and other need to look at a new style of peg.

This is also an issue at Pee Wee's and Bantam's.
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

I have seen you shoot the puck, Mr. McSorely... In your case, it's the goalies trying to dive out of the way of your booming slapshot which knocks the posts off!!! :lol:
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Post by mnhcky65 »

youngblood08 wrote:The refs were to busy watching the WBL hacks dive tackle the players already down on the ice. Like the one #7 performed in the 2nd period and that wasn't the only time it was performed.
you can quit bashin #7 already youngblood... we know it was a cheap hit but it was on of about 1,000 cheap hits by both teams in that game.. give it a rest.. this is boys hockey, you gotta be able to take a hit, it wasnt even that hard of a hit.
defense
Posts: 1637
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:20 pm
Location: right here

Re: Net Movement

Post by defense »

BodyShots wrote:How many times can a goalie move the net during play before a delay of game penalty should be called?

I saw a game last night, where every time the goalie slid side-to-side, he would slide into the pipe and move the net. I would love to see the posts go deeper into the ice to prevent this non-sense.

Your thoughts?
It sure is convenient on a breakaway for the goalie to get "completely deaked" out of his pads so much that some how he ends up sliding backwards on his stomach and his foot just happens to hit the post knocking the goal off before the puck is fired over him into the net..........
when the would be goal scorer is still at the top of the circles....... :wink:
WBLHockeyfan04
Posts: 366
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:32 pm

Post by WBLHockeyfan04 »

It's tough to question whether the net coming off is intentional or unintentional at times. I think if it happens when a team is putting on constant pressure, then there should be a first warning. Then if it happens again in a simular situation. Then a delay of game penalty should be called on the goaltender. In regards to the WBL vs Stillwater game last night. I saw the net bumped off twice by the Stillwater goalie, with the second time coming when the Bears were putting on alot of pressure. I don't want to be one to accuse, but It seemed like that was intentional from what I saw. I'm not one to make excuses, but those nets always seem to come off alot easier when one team is putting on alot of offensive pressure :D
youngblood08
Posts: 1007
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm

Post by youngblood08 »

WBLHOCKEYFAN quit bashing the STillwater goalie. This is BOYS hockey you have to be able to handle a whistle or the net moving. Give it a rest already.
The51
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:48 am

Post by The51 »

Zamman wrote:
Rossbury21 wrote:I think they should mandate a change to the rubber stoppers during games that most College and Professional teams now do...they require a little more work during intermission, but it is so much more effective, because the net will never be slightly off, if it gets nudged it will just move right back in.

The Problem with calling a penalty however is it is a judgement call, one ref will call it more then another.
A lot of rinks cannot change to the rubber pegs. That would mean drilling holes in concrete, which would cause stress fractures in the flooring. In our rink we have a sand floor and the holes would just keep expanding or cave in. Not to mention that our pipes are just below the ice surface.

Another point should be that people need to properly peg nets after the ice is made. I see most rinks and players kneel down and bang the peg into the ice then set the net on top of it. I was taught many years ago to take the peg, lift the net, set the peg in the pipe and drop the net. That causes enough pressure to sink the spike and the end of the peg. i do not see many nets moving off when this is done.
interesting point, i didnt know this
Post Reply