Woodbury vs. White Bear Lake 2-19

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Who wins?

Poll ended at Fri Feb 20, 2009 7:04 am

Bears
16
52%
Royals
15
48%
 
Total votes: 31

Hockeyfan#8
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:36 pm

Re: Stud

Post by Hockeyfan#8 »

sicknasty7722 wrote:
MedleyWR wrote:
Hockeyfan#8 wrote:Ben Clark is gonna score in overtime to win the game for the Bears. Hes a scoring machine.

:lol: With zero goals (he has one JV goal) and four assists Clarky isn't exactly a scoring machine. But he plays solid D and has a respectable +12 +/- ranking. But, who knows, maybe you are able to foretell the future, and the JMan will bury the game winner in OT. How do you see the future? Tarot cards, tea leaves, Ouija Board? Can you help me pick some stocks? :lol:
:lol: Have you ever considered stand-up, Medley?
Like thats a lagit source.(does Z. Loesch have a +16 too?)
mnhcky65
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:47 pm

Re: Stud

Post by mnhcky65 »

Hockeyfan#8 wrote:
sicknasty7722 wrote:
MedleyWR wrote:
:lol: With zero goals (he has one JV goal) and four assists Clarky isn't exactly a scoring machine. But he plays solid D and has a respectable +12 +/- ranking. But, who knows, maybe you are able to foretell the future, and the JMan will bury the game winner in OT. How do you see the future? Tarot cards, tea leaves, Ouija Board? Can you help me pick some stocks? :lol:
:lol: Have you ever considered stand-up, Medley?
Like thats a lagit source.(does Z. Loesch have a +16 too?)


when you can learn to spell, then you can complain.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Re: Stud

Post by BodyShots »

mnhcky65 wrote:
Hockeyfan#8 wrote:
sicknasty7722 wrote: :lol: Have you ever considered stand-up, Medley?
Like thats a lagit source.(does Z. Loesch have a +16 too?)


when you can learn to spell, then you can complain.
With a sentence like that, I wouldn't be so quick to judge!
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Where's blanco oso??

Post by Goldfishdude »

oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
Hockeyfan#8
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:36 pm

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by Hockeyfan#8 »

Goldfishdude wrote:oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
Why is everyone so critical about grammar on this forum?
got some
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by got some »

If you can't make it out to Woodbury, it's on FSN tonight, 7:30!
mngophs04
Posts: 63
Joined: Thu Feb 12, 2009 10:22 pm

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by mngophs04 »

Goldfishdude wrote:oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
This literally made me laugh out loud :lol:

Anyways, for my prediction...
WBL 5
Woodbury 4
OT
TheNightman
Posts: 651
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 2:41 pm

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by TheNightman »

Goldfishdude wrote:oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
Blanco is carefully planning out his witty, literate response. While we're on the topic correcting his grammar I should point out that in Spanish, White Bear is actually Oso Blanco not Blanco Oso. I hear Bear White is a good team too though.
karl(east)
Posts: 6480
Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
Contact:

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by karl(east) »

TheNightman wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
Blanco is carefully planning out his witty, literate response. While we're on the topic correcting his grammar I should point out that in Spanish, White Bear is actually Oso Blanco not Blanco Oso. I hear Bear White is a good team too though.
:lol: I'm glad someone else caught this...
mvhockey12
Posts: 68
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 11:29 pm

Post by mvhockey12 »

White Bear is bad.
wblhockeyfan8
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:37 pm
Location: White Bear Lake, MN. Front row of the student section.

Post by wblhockeyfan8 »

I think mvhockey might be a little cranky considering we dominate moundsview 7-0.
Hockeyfan#8
Posts: 124
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 2:36 pm

Re: Stud

Post by Hockeyfan#8 »

Hockeyfan#8 wrote:Ben Clark is gonna score in overtime to win the game for the Bears. Hes a scoring machine.
White Bear would have won if Ben Clark would have played in the ot.
wblhockeyfan8
Posts: 839
Joined: Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:37 pm
Location: White Bear Lake, MN. Front row of the student section.

Re: Stud

Post by wblhockeyfan8 »

Hockeyfan#8 wrote:
Hockeyfan#8 wrote:Ben Clark is gonna score in overtime to win the game for the Bears. Hes a scoring machine.
White Bear would have won if Ben Clark would have played in the ot.
This we can all agree upon.
got some
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by got some »

Being a Bears fan, it was a very frustrating game.

3-2, Woodbury wins with 21 seconds remaining in OT. Bummer.
biscuit in the basket
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:30 pm

Post by biscuit in the basket »

It came down to WB just didnt finish their chances and Woodbury did.
I'll also give credit to Ness as he made some big saves point blank.
Puck the Sioux, Go Gophers.
SEC Scotty
Posts: 1037
Joined: Thu Jul 13, 2006 8:58 am
Location: East Metro

Post by SEC Scotty »

biscuit in the basket wrote:It came down to WB just didnt finish their chances and Woodbury did.
I'll also give credit to Ness as he made some big saves point blank.
Really. Hit the net.
Pioneerprideguy
Posts: 1304
Joined: Fri Nov 03, 2006 7:38 am

Post by Pioneerprideguy »

I was not overly impressed with Woodbury (exception of Ness & Nowicki). I was impressed with WB's poise and spacing. Had they buried their point blank chances, they win by at least 2. If they get more from Owen, I predict that WB will come out of section 4...unfortunately.
slapstkhound
Posts: 158
Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:27 pm

Post by slapstkhound »

Pioneerprideguy wrote:I was not overly impressed with Woodbury (exception of Ness & Nowicki). I was impressed with WB's poise and spacing. Had they buried their point blank chances, they win by at least 2. If they get more from Owen, I predict that WB will come out of section 4...unfortunately.
You can be as unimpressed as you like, but a reocrd of 20-3-2 shows that this team has the ability to win in tough situations. Even though you're a Hill guy, you have the same old WBL lament of "if only Owen did more"..."if only we had buried the point blank chances". The fact is that WBL didn't and hasn't all season.
blanco oso
Posts: 139
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 1:10 am

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by blanco oso »

TheNightman wrote:
Goldfishdude wrote:oh.. blancoooooooo??? Where are you??? Can't have a WBL prediction without you, and your insight...

He's been awfully quiet since he tried to correct my grammar...

I miss you, blanco!!!!!
Blanco is carefully planning out his witty, literate response. While we're on the topic correcting his grammar I should point out that in Spanish, White Bear is actually Oso Blanco not Blanco Oso. I hear Bear White is a good team too though.
this is the first time anyone has noticed...I didnt know how long it was going to take. and i apologize goldfish dude, the computer was down a few days. anyways, i still see WB getting 1 or 2 seed. Lets just hope sager is a better arguer than coach when it comes sunday morning :?
Land Of The Free, Home Of The BEARS
wbmd
Posts: 3926
Joined: Thu Dec 22, 2005 7:51 pm

Re: Where's blanco oso??

Post by wbmd »

blanco oso wrote:i still see WB getting 1 or 2 seed. Lets just hope sager is a better arguer than coach when it comes sunday morning
Actually, arguing has nothing to do with it. It's how each head coach votes.
wbhockey02
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Dec 20, 2008 9:36 am
Location: Tha Dub-B

Post by wbhockey02 »

surprise, surprise Owen doesn't show up again you would think that with White Bear controlling this game for 3 periods (in my opinion) that he could back them up a little bit, but no, I just hope he got all that out of his system before playoffs, which I think he has now and with the addition of Birki maybe, we should be able to get deep into the playoffs and probably state if they turn it on

(P.S.) hats off to Ness he played an outstanding game as much as I hate to say it
Goldfishdude
Posts: 1596
Joined: Fri Jan 30, 2009 4:41 pm

Post by Goldfishdude »

blanco????/ Glad you're back.... Of course I would notice... The other chumps here may not care, but I do....
joycer10
Posts: 121
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:28 pm

Post by joycer10 »

wbhockey02 wrote:surprise, surprise Owen doesn't show up again you would think that with White Bear controlling this game for 3 periods (in my opinion) that he could back them up a little bit, but no, I just hope he got all that out of his system before playoffs, which I think he has now and with the addition of Birki maybe, we should be able to get deep into the playoffs and probably state if they turn it on

(P.S.) hats off to Ness he played an outstanding game as much as I hate to say it
um.... the shots were 6-1 woodbury after the first and white bear only got 1 shot in the O.T to woodbury's 5. I wouldn't say White Bear controlled this game it really went back and forth. Also why do people keep saying collette played bad he made more saves than ness did and I thought he did decent job last night not spectacular or anything but definatley not as bad as people are saying.
got some
Posts: 164
Joined: Thu Feb 05, 2009 1:43 pm

Post by got some »

joycer10 wrote:
wbhockey02 wrote:surprise, surprise Owen doesn't show up again you would think that with White Bear controlling this game for 3 periods (in my opinion) that he could back them up a little bit, but no, I just hope he got all that out of his system before playoffs, which I think he has now and with the addition of Birki maybe, we should be able to get deep into the playoffs and probably state if they turn it on

(P.S.) hats off to Ness he played an outstanding game as much as I hate to say it
um.... the shots were 6-1 woodbury after the first and white bear only got 1 shot in the O.T to woodbury's 5. I wouldn't say White Bear controlled this game it really went back and forth. Also why do people keep saying collette played bad he made more saves than ness did and I thought he did decent job last night not spectacular or anything but definatley not as bad as people are saying.
Woodbury obviously controlled the first period (2-0 after the 1st), but the Bears definitely controlled the remaining two. Overall, the bears looked like the better team... It was not "back-to-back" in the second or third when the bears had CONSTANT shots hitting the net but just couldn't capitalize or get the rebounds.

I believe the final shots, in regulation, were 21 for WB and 19 for Woodbury.

However, in my opinion, Owen really stepped up in OT. He made some great saves.
ImissMYhockey
Posts: 312
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 11:26 pm

Post by ImissMYhockey »

got some wrote:
joycer10 wrote:
wbhockey02 wrote:surprise, surprise Owen doesn't show up again you would think that with White Bear controlling this game for 3 periods (in my opinion) that he could back them up a little bit, but no, I just hope he got all that out of his system before playoffs, which I think he has now and with the addition of Birki maybe, we should be able to get deep into the playoffs and probably state if they turn it on

(P.S.) hats off to Ness he played an outstanding game as much as I hate to say it
um.... the shots were 6-1 woodbury after the first and white bear only got 1 shot in the O.T to woodbury's 5. I wouldn't say White Bear controlled this game it really went back and forth. Also why do people keep saying collette played bad he made more saves than ness did and I thought he did decent job last night not spectacular or anything but definatley not as bad as people are saying.
Woodbury obviously controlled the first period (2-0 after the 1st), but the Bears definitely controlled the remaining two. Overall, the bears looked like the better team... It was not "back-to-back" in the second or third when the bears had CONSTANT shots hitting the net but just couldn't capitalize or get the rebounds.

I believe the final shots, in regulation, were 21 for WB and 19 for Woodbury.

However, in my opinion, Owen really stepped up in OT. He made some great saves.
First off it was 1-0 after the first period with Pittman scoring on a snipe. The second period I thought white bear really came out and played well, they just couldn't slip the puck passed ness. I felt besides the 1st period it was a good game by both teams and fun to watch.
One last thing I noticed last night was it seemed like both teams missed the net on good scoring opportunities in close a few times.
Post Reply