HShockeywatcher wrote:
adamp1914,
that is an interesting perspective and actually makes sense.
That being said, doesn't that go back to what lugnutguy21 said though? Both SSP and Maht tied STA this year. This section is open. If STA makes it this year, shouldn't any hate be directed toward other teams for stepping up and taking STA down? If you are right in that there are 2 or 3 other teams yearly who could make it, why is it their fault they aren't getting beat?
I just said that those are the types of arguments I've heard. You can't really refute something unless you can show that you understand the argument from the other side first.

I was pretty clear that I didn't agree because the sampling of athletic success is way too brief and way too small.
RockyDennis. STA has not shown a long enough streak of such dominance to consider moving up. The statistical sample of success is way too small and isn't even continuous. In fact, SSP and MAhtomedi BOTH have a larger number of section championships. So why isn't anyone saying that they should be AA too?
STA won one conference title over the AA champion. So what? In the 70s SSP won a STATE title over Edina. Does that mean they should be AA too? One conference title cannot be enough proof that they should advance in any stretch of the imagination. You make it sound like kids don't graduate. Just because they are good now doesn't mean they are going to continue to be good indefinitely. If they win like 7, 8, 9 more titles over AA schools, sure, then that conclusion might follow. Right now, it cannot.
"Second, for a long time St. Thomas would get beaten handily by most of the Suburban Conference." - Exactly. Who's to say that won't ever be the case again? You can't. No one can because the continued dominance isn't established yet. This is an argument FOR keeping them in class A.
dherman: you obviously didn't read the entire thread before you posted.
It's already been proven that enrollment has nothing to do with being A or AA. This can be proven with one word. Roseau.
I'd also like to add that at this level great rivalries stem from things beyond 'hate' and 'respect.' Respect is part of it, but at this level, all of the best rivalries happen because most of the kids on the opposing teams are from the same area and they know each other. There's very few rivalries between schools that are far apart (the only one that comes to mind is Edina and Grand Rapids).. The rivalries are built from respect, and the relationships of the players. Look at all the rivalries. Roseau - Warroad. St Paul Saints - Como. Hill Murray - White Bear Lake. Edina - Minnetonka. St. Thomas - Cretin. Breck - Blake. Lourdes - Century. Mayo - Lourdes. (pretty much any Rochester match up). There's tons of others, but you get the idea. Since the players usually know each other, there is also pride and bragging rights involved with rivalry building.