First Year Bantams

basketballguy · Post by **basketballguy** » Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:26 am

How about Anthony Walsh- Edina

hockeyguy60 · Post by **hockeyguy60** » Wed Feb 18, 2009 11:43 pm

Hockey911 wrote:
hugedanglefest69 wrote:Frankie Mork, Connor Thie, Justin Quale (Goalie)

Besse is over rated. He doesn't work hard.

are you serious? you must be a hopkins parent or player. Mork is good but the other two are just average.

mngopherfan · Post by **mngopherfan** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 7:39 am

ctbrow1 wrote:the better 1st year bantams in district 1 are:

Marshall Tema-Mpls Park
Tyler Broderson-MPLS Park
CJ Lachappelle-Como
Kendall Bolen-Como

These guys should get a pretty good look at the development camp.

Where are Tema and Broderson from? MPLS or SLP?

hockeyman84 · Post by **hockeyman84** » Thu Feb 19, 2009 10:26 pm

Tema is from SW and Brodersen is from SLP

Chaos777 · Post by **Chaos777** » Sun Feb 22, 2009 11:08 pm

hockeyguy60 wrote:
Hockey911 wrote:
hugedanglefest69 wrote:Frankie Mork, Connor Thie, Justin Quale (Goalie)

Besse is over rated. He doesn't work hard.

are you serious? you must be a hopkins parent or player. Mork is good but the other two are just average.

Well Hopkins team won't be bad next year they have Justin Quale at goalie
and two good forwards that did really well this year and last year I think they are Thie and Naas if that sounds right. I don't know, what do you guys think?

The names are correct, both are fairly talented players. Naas is going to be limited by his size. But I don't think they are playing at the same level as some of the other top first years.

hockeyguy60 · Post by **hockeyguy60** » Mon Feb 23, 2009 4:38 pm

Chaos777 wrote:
hockeyguy60 wrote:
Hockey911 wrote:

are you serious? you must be a hopkins parent or player. Mork is good but the other two are just average.

The names are correct, both are fairly talented players. Naas is going to be limited by his size. But I don't think they are playing at the same level as some of the other top first years.

Chaos777 · Post by **Chaos777** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 12:28 pm

hockeyguy60 wrote:
Chaos777 wrote:
hockeyguy60 wrote:
Well Hopkins team won't be bad next year they have Justin Quale at goalie
and two good forwards that did really well this year and last year I think they are Thie and Naas if that sounds right. I don't know, what do you guys think?
The names are correct, both are fairly talented players. Naas is going to be limited by his size. But I don't think they are playing at the same level as some of the other top first years.

Yes I agree, Naas is small but is pretty slippery and is good at avoiding checks. Thie and him work great together. I have watched them play three times over the past year and a half and every game each player had at least 1 assist to the other. Right now Hopkins has a very talented forward Holmquist, he has size and speed,he should play varsity next year. Those are just my observations what do others think?

I've seen Thie and Naas play together before, they do work very well together for sure. I just from what I've seen wouldn't go so far as to put them in the top first years in state. As far as Holmquist I cannot comment, I've not seen him play.

hockeyguy60 · Post by **hockeyguy60** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 12:51 pm

Chaos777 wrote:
hockeyguy60 wrote:
Chaos777 wrote: The names are correct, both are fairly talented players. Naas is going to be limited by his size. But I don't think they are playing at the same level as some of the other top first years.

Yes I agree, Naas is small but is pretty slippery and is good at avoiding checks. Thie and him work great together. I have watched them play three times over the past year and a half and every game each player had at least 1 assist to the other. Right now Hopkins has a very talented forward Holmquist, he has size and speed,he should play varsity next year. Those are just my observations what do others think?
I've seen Thie and Naas play together before, they do work very well together for sure. I just from what I've seen wouldn't go so far as to put them in the top first years in state. As far as Holmquist I cannot comment, I've not seen him play.

Yes I definately agree there are some better first years than them.

Chaos777 · Post by **Chaos777** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:05 pm

hockeyguy60 wrote:
Chaos777 wrote:
hockeyguy60 wrote:

Yes I agree, Naas is small but is pretty slippery and is good at avoiding checks. Thie and him work great together. I have watched them play three times over the past year and a half and every game each player had at least 1 assist to the other. Right now Hopkins has a very talented forward Holmquist, he has size and speed,he should play varsity next year. Those are just my observations what do others think?
I've seen Thie and Naas play together before, they do work very well together for sure. I just from what I've seen wouldn't go so far as to put them in the top first years in state. As far as Holmquist I cannot comment, I've not seen him play.
Yes I definately agree there are some better first years than them.

Who would you say are the top 3 or so first year bantams in the state?

observer · Post by **observer** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 1:39 pm

Probably some after July 1 94s.

sierramist101011 · Post by **sierramist101011** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 12:28 am

Jake Erickson, Great player.

hockeykid1010 · Post by **hockeykid1010** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 8:58 pm

What about the Wisconsin Fire Bantams?

hockeykid1010 · Post by **hockeykid1010** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:00 pm

Casey Jerry, is okay..

hockeykid1010 · Post by **hockeykid1010** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:05 pm

Thomas Lindstrom is a good player from the fire. he is from champlain

HogwartsW&W · Post by **HogwartsW&W** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:22 pm

starmvp wrote:Hudson Fasching, Frankie Mork, Patrick Graham, Grant Besse

hmmmmmmmmmm. they all go to breck. Grant Besse is amazing. all the others here are junk

Chaos777 · Post by **Chaos777** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:28 pm

HogwartsW&W wrote:
starmvp wrote:Hudson Fasching, Frankie Mork, Patrick Graham, Grant Besse
hmmmmmmmmmm. they all go to breck. Grant Besse is amazing. all the others here are junk

You honestly think that Hudson Fasching is a "junk" player? I think you're just biased towards Besse, because all those other players, especially Fasching, are not junk, they are very solid players.

Hoops · Post by **Hoops** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:02 pm

HogwartsW&W wrote:
starmvp wrote:Hudson Fasching, Frankie Mork, Patrick Graham, Grant Besse
hmmmmmmmmmm. they all go to breck. Grant Besse is amazing. all the others here are junk

You are nuts. Fasching is darn good and he goes to Apple Valley...which just won the district w/ EP,Edina,Jefferson, Mtka and Burnsville in it....largely due to him. He will be a major player on a very good AV Varsity next yr.

StillAnEagle · Post by **StillAnEagle** » Wed Mar 24, 2010 1:44 pm

Hoops wrote:
HogwartsW&W wrote:
starmvp wrote:Hudson Fasching, Frankie Mork, Patrick Graham, Grant Besse
hmmmmmmmmmm. they all go to breck. Grant Besse is amazing. all the others here are junk
You are nuts. Fasching is darn good and he goes to Apple Valley...which just won the district w/ EP,Edina,Jefferson, Mtka and Burnsville in it....largely due to him. He will be a major player on a very good AV Varsity next yr.

Heckuva prediction. You nailed it.

just me · Post by **just me** » Thu Mar 25, 2010 8:03 am

Cline from Blaine needs to be on this list for sure.

Nobodyonya · Post by **Nobodyonya** » Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:00 pm

There are alot of 1st year Bantams that should be represented on this thread its just that they may not play for a highly ranked team or don't have the exposure like others do

dogeatdog1 · Post by **dogeatdog1** » Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:34 pm

Nobodyonya wrote:There are alot of 1st year Bantams that should be represented on this thread its just that they may not play for a highly ranked team or don't have the exposure like others do

that is why this forum exists ... believe me top talent kids don't get missed at the second year bantam level...

pantherfan · Post by **pantherfan** » Thu Mar 25, 2010 4:57 pm

Thats true, Top players are noiticed by there 2nd year. not too many get missed if any.

bosshard · Post by **bosshard** » Thu Apr 22, 2010 8:47 am

dogeatdog1 wrote:
Nobodyonya wrote:There are alot of 1st year Bantams that should be represented on this thread its just that they may not play for a highly ranked team or don't have the exposure like others do
that is why this forum exists ... believe me top talent kids don't get missed at the second year bantam level...

there is a good 1st year bantam from luverne, he's a young goaltender but needs some size, i think if he can get size he'll be one of the top in the state for goaltending

hockeydawg · Post by **hockeydawg** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 7:44 am

bosshard wrote:
dogeatdog1 wrote:
Nobodyonya wrote:There are alot of 1st year Bantams that should be represented on this thread its just that they may not play for a highly ranked team or don't have the exposure like others do
that is why this forum exists ... believe me top talent kids don't get missed at the second year bantam level...

there is a good 1st year bantam from luverne, he's a young goaltender but needs some size, i think if he can get size he'll be one of the top in the state for goaltending

If he's that good he should get noticed, but he better go play summer hockey somewhere and get out of Luvern.

bosshard · Post by **bosshard** » Fri Apr 23, 2010 9:43 am

yes, i believe he plays mavericks out of albert lea and select 15 he made the team