Section 4AA

stpaul · Post by **stpaul** » Wed Feb 25, 2009 8:56 pm

That's a sensational story. However it has no resemblance to the truth, which is, of course, none of our business. Please don't post crap that you heard via some high school age kids rumor mill as fact.

sddave · Post by **sddave** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 3:08 pm

Care to enlighten us with the true story, stpaul?

Perhaps if we openly discuss the missteps of others it will enable those that follow to not make the same mistakes. (Study history or be doomed to repeat)

puckfan70 · Post by **puckfan70** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 5:24 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:Well, it appears the MSHSL got what it wanted this year & that is parity in this section. Here's the real story behind the HM "incident". These players were not removed any any wrong doings. That was just a version to throw at the public. The real story was that the high school league looked at Hill's team this year and saw a large gap between them & the rest of the teams in this section. The league was concerned that come section time nobody would pay to see the games because the outcome would never be in doubt and the scores would be pretty lopsided in Hill's favor. So the MSHSL league contacted the school and discussed a plan to make thi ngs more competitive for this section this year. The first move was to blow up one of the state's top lines by taking away 2 high end players. The league still thought HM would dominate so they requested 2 more seniors be added to the mix. Hill tried to negotiate for younger/less experienced players, but ultimately conceeded to the request.

The section now provides a realistic shot for 5 teams to grab the section title. Interest is high with the participating schools & people will come out to see what happens which will provide the MSHSL with more revenue. It appears to have worked out well for the high school league.

But you may ask, what's in it for Hill Murray? Well, the high school reminded the school that it has always turned it's back when Hill has been accused of violating the recruiting rules & they promised to continue doing so in exchange for their cooperation in this matter.

Come on, do you really beleive that??

thorhockey · Post by **thorhockey** » Thu Feb 26, 2009 9:53 pm

Come on, do you really beleive that??

Knowing PPG the answer is:
yes he does

mnhockey73 · Post by **mnhockey73** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:16 pm

puckfan70 wrote:
Pioneerprideguy wrote:Well, it appears the MSHSL got what it wanted this year & that is parity in this section. Here's the real story behind the HM "incident". These players were not removed any any wrong doings. That was just a version to throw at the public. The real story was that the high school league looked at Hill's team this year and saw a large gap between them & the rest of the teams in this section. The league was concerned that come section time nobody would pay to see the games because the outcome would never be in doubt and the scores would be pretty lopsided in Hill's favor. So the MSHSL league contacted the school and discussed a plan to make thi ngs more competitive for this section this year. The first move was to blow up one of the state's top lines by taking away 2 high end players. The league still thought HM would dominate so they requested 2 more seniors be added to the mix. Hill tried to negotiate for younger/less experienced players, but ultimately conceeded to the request.

The section now provides a realistic shot for 5 teams to grab the section title. Interest is high with the participating schools & people will come out to see what happens which will provide the MSHSL with more revenue. It appears to have worked out well for the high school league.

But you may ask, what's in it for Hill Murray? Well, the high school reminded the school that it has always turned it's back when Hill has been accused of violating the recruiting rules & they promised to continue doing so in exchange for their cooperation in this matter.

Come on, do you really beleive that??

You really think this is what happened? You are officially retarded. The 4 Hill Murray players got caught with some drug and were expelled from the hockey season. Don't believe this bologna.

wbhockey02 · Post by **wbhockey02** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:30 pm

Pioneerprideguy wrote:Well, it appears the MSHSL got what it wanted this year & that is parity in this section. Here's the real story behind the HM "incident". These players were not removed any any wrong doings. That was just a version to throw at the public. The real story was that the high school league looked at Hill's team this year and saw a large gap between them & the rest of the teams in this section. The league was concerned that come section time nobody would pay to see the games because the outcome would never be in doubt and the scores would be pretty lopsided in Hill's favor. So the MSHSL league contacted the school and discussed a plan to make things more competitive for this section this year. The first move was to blow up one of the state's top lines by taking away 2 high end players. The league still thought HM would dominate so they requested 2 more seniors be added to the mix. Hill tried to negotiate for younger/less experienced players, but ultimately conceeded to the request.

The section now provides a realistic shot for 5 teams to grab the section title. Interest is high with the participating schools & people will come out to see what happens which will provide the MSHSL with more revenue. It appears to have worked out well for the high school league.

But you may ask, what's in it for Hill Murray? Well, the high school reminded the school that it has always turned it's back when Hill has been accused of violating the recruiting rules & they promised to continue doing so in exchange for their cooperation in this matter.

what an idiot

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 9:37 pm

I believe only an "idiot" would not recognize the

symbol and be able to understand it was meant in jest. I hate having to always educate public school ignorance.

got some · Post by **got some** » Fri Feb 27, 2009 10:10 pm

I'm sorry that the ignorant public school grads aren't taught the concept of the usage of emoticons in school. However, I'm sure that kind of thing is very well-taught at private schools across the nation.

Gotta get your moneys worth.

Pioneerprideguy · Post by **Pioneerprideguy** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:18 am

got some wrote:I'm sorry that the ignorant public school grads aren't taught the concept of the usage of emoticons in school. However, I'm sure that kind of thing is very well-taught at private schools across the nation. Gotta get your moneys worth.

I'd like the #4 & can you supersize that for me.

thorhockey · Post by **thorhockey** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:33 am

Sorry PPG
Don't let these guys stop ya from continuing your witty sarcasm. I seek, and sometimes encourage, your responses on here.

hockeyhockeyhockey · Post by **hockeyhockeyhockey** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:37 am

its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.

wbhockey02 · Post by **wbhockey02** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 8:46 am

Pioneerprideguy wrote:I believe only an "idiot" would not recognize the symbol and be able to understand it was meant in jest. I hate having to always educate public school ignorance.

then pleese dont make them ther posts they confuz us publik skool kidz

mnhockey73 · Post by **mnhockey73** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:04 am

Pioneerprideguy wrote:I believe only an "idiot" would not recognize the symbol and be able to understand it was meant in jest. I hate having to always educate public school ignorance.

I guess us public school's just don't have enough money to learn about Emoticons. It's a shame really.

mnhockey73 · Post by **mnhockey73** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 9:05 am

hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.

Tartan this year.

mngophs04 · Post by **mngophs04** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 2:02 pm

mnhockey73 wrote:
hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.
Tartan this year.

Sorry... not this year

mnhockey73 · Post by **mnhockey73** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 3:16 pm

mngophs04 wrote:
mnhockey73 wrote:
hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.
Tartan this year.
Sorry... not this year

Next year for sure.

formerlybackofnet · Post by **formerlybackofnet** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:32 pm

Ah, Tartan #1 seed?. I thnk not.

Elvis · Post by **Elvis** » Sat Feb 28, 2009 4:38 pm

They deserved the #1 seed, but they play the games for a reason! STA should have opted up this year. Mahtomedi and SSP would have a great chance in this section as well this season.

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:37 am

Interesting now with #2 Hill-Murray, #3 White Bear Lake, #5 Stillwater and #8 St. Paul Johnson remaining.

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 9:48 am

Pioneerprideguy wrote:
got some wrote:I'm sorry that the ignorant public school grads aren't taught the concept of the usage of emoticons in school. However, I'm sure that kind of thing is very well-taught at private schools across the nation. Gotta get your moneys worth.
I'd like the #4 & can you supersize that for me.

PPG??? As in the legendary movie, Caddyshack, when Carl the Greenskeeper says... so do I....

"I have to laugh...... eeeeoooo..rooooohhhh...yoooooohhh!"

JHShockeyplayer11 · Post by **JHShockeyplayer11** » Sun Mar 01, 2009 6:03 pm

wbmd wrote:Interesting now with #2 Hill-Murray, #3 White Bear Lake, #5 Stillwater and #8 St. Paul Johnson remaining.

Yeah. this is very exciting and i can't wait to see what happens. its up for grabs for anyone of these teams especially if johnson keeps playing as well as they did saturday.

hockeyhockeyhockey · Post by **hockeyhockeyhockey** » Thu Mar 05, 2009 7:43 pm

hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.

smart guy here!

BodyShots · Post by **BodyShots** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 9:30 am

hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:
hockeyhockeyhockey wrote:its really hard to make a call here..

this is a disaster of a White Bear team..too bad as this would have been a nice year to see them get in and maybe finally win a first round game in the tourny.

tartan maybe next year.

HM is so depleated they just dont seem to have the horses to carry them unless Castro just takes control and the new 2nd line heats up.

I actually think the winner of the 4 5 game has some shot here.

I Cant call it.
smart guy here!

No, I think you are the one who started a thread stating Tonka was going to win it all.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Section 4AA

Who goes to state?

HM