Leddy or Buddish

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

HockeyMN1
Posts: 833
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:02 am

Leddy or Buddish

Post by HockeyMN1 »

Who would you rather have (when healthy) and who do you think will go higher in the draft?
starmvp
Posts: 3224
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:12 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by starmvp »

Buddish because he is such a force on the ice and he can get his team going better than Leddy can. It would have been really interesting to see what Buddish would have done this year if he was healthy. I think Buddish will go sometime late first round in the NHL draft and Leddy will follow in second round.
biscuit in the basket
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: Leddy or Buddish

Post by biscuit in the basket »

HockeyMN1 wrote:Who would you rather have (when healthy) and who do you think will go higher in the draft?
Good thing the Gophers will have both. :D
Puck the Sioux, Go Gophers.
scoreboard33
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:53 pm

Post by scoreboard33 »

I'd also say Budish because it is really hard to find big forwards who can score like Budish, its probably easier to find good offensive defensemen like Leddy, but I think their talent levels are similiar.
Doglover
Posts: 550
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 4:54 pm

Post by Doglover »

Both amazing hockey players, but I have to go with Budish. He's smart, strong, talented and unselfish and makes the players around him better. Leddy is great as well I and I look forward to watching them both play as Gophers!! Budish first round, Leddy second.
HockeyMN1
Posts: 833
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 11:02 am

Re: Leddy or Buddish

Post by HockeyMN1 »

biscuit in the basket wrote:
HockeyMN1 wrote:Who would you rather have (when healthy) and who do you think will go higher in the draft?
Good thing the Gophers will have both. :D
Yea but Buddish is going to the Juniors for a year so they will only be on the same team if Leddy sticks around for a while. Personally I think both are potential NHL all stars.
starmvp
Posts: 3224
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:12 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Re: Leddy or Buddish

Post by starmvp »

HockeyMN1 wrote:
biscuit in the basket wrote:
HockeyMN1 wrote:Who would you rather have (when healthy) and who do you think will go higher in the draft?
Good thing the Gophers will have both. :D
Yea but Buddish is going to the Juniors for a year so they will only be on the same team if Leddy sticks around for a while. Personally I think both are potential NHL all stars.
Definitely. So Buddish is for sure going to Juniors for a year?
chuckapuckguru
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2007 5:53 pm

Post by chuckapuckguru »

Not even a good question. The better question is Budish now (recovering from an ACL) or Leddy now (Healthy). That is more valid. I still say Budish hands down
Papa Bergundy
Posts: 305
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: The Channel 4 News Room

Post by Papa Bergundy »

I have a good question: Budish or Buddish?

I always thought it was Budish but I still see people consistently spelling it Buddish. Can someone who knows 100% end this once and for all.

Maybe produce a birth certificate!? Then we can kill two birds with one stone to make sure he's not 25 or something.
Stay Classy, Minnesota.
scoreboard33
Posts: 581
Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:53 pm

Post by scoreboard33 »

Papa Bergundy wrote:I have a good question: Budish or Buddish?

I always thought it was Budish but I still see people consistently spelling it Buddish. Can someone who knows 100% end this once and for all.

Maybe produce a birth certificate!? Then we can kill two birds with one stone to make sure he's not 25 or something.
It is Budish. So you are right Papa Bergundy.

Chuckapuckguru, you are a complete moron, please shut up.
Hockey_High09
Posts: 32
Joined: Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:12 am

Post by Hockey_High09 »

scoreboard33 wrote:
Papa Bergundy wrote:I have a good question: Budish or Buddish?

I always thought it was Budish but I still see people consistently spelling it Buddish. Can someone who knows 100% end this once and for all.

Maybe produce a birth certificate!? Then we can kill two birds with one stone to make sure he's not 25 or something.
It is Budish. So you are right Papa Bergundy.

Chuckapuckguru, you are a complete moron, please shut up.
I'm gonna have to go with Leddy on this one because, as a D, he is able to play 50% of the game and when he's out there he is dominant. Not only is he a shut down defensemen, he is also a threat offensively and a cornerstone on their PP.

I believe it is Buddish...
Nostalgic Nerd
Posts: 1366
Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: St. Paul, MN

Post by Nostalgic Nerd »

Really dumb question...what is Leddy's full-name and who does he play for?
I can splash in the rink puddles!
The Exiled One
Posts: 1788
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 8:34 am

Post by The Exiled One »

scoreboard33 wrote:It is Budish. So you are right Papa Bergundy.
Right
Hockey_High09 wrote:I believe it is Buddish...
Wrong
bananastick
Posts: 78
Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 9:54 am

Post by bananastick »

Leddy, without a doubt. Could be the best skater in the state. He has explosive speed, great hands, great playmaker. I can only imagine his hockey IQ is very high and he see's the ice better than most. The game starts from the goalie out, if the defense can't move the puck, guys like Budish have nothing.
Frank Mazzocco
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Feb 08, 2009 11:47 am

Post by Frank Mazzocco »

Budish. I saw Ben Marshall last night for the first time this year, amazing player. I was suprirsed how strong he was for a little guy....He will be better than Leddy.
midwesthockeyscout
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:14 am

Post by midwesthockeyscout »

I really don't have an opinion on who is the better player, since both are splendid players, but in terms of draft status, I can tell you, and even if Hockey Scout is around, too, he might throw his words into the mix, that big, scoring forwards are a dime a dozen, and defensemen that can control the game are more rare and much hotter commodities.

The top level scouts will have to believe that Leddy can elevate his defense at the next level in order to be a substantially high draft pick, because under this premise that I have seen over the course of the last few years, the trend has been to take the top talent on defense.
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher »

Nostalgic Nerd wrote:Really dumb question...what is Leddy's full-name and who does he play for?
Nick Leddy. Senior defenseman for Eden Prairie
The U invented swagger.
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

really?

Post by O-townClown »

midwesthockeyscout wrote:I can tell you, and even if Hockey Scout is around, too, he might throw his words into the mix, that big, scoring forwards are a dime a dozen,
That's funny, because I know an NHL scout and he was talking at Christmas about how rare it is to see big players put the puck in the net.
Be kind. Rewind.
southernmnscout
Posts: 568
Joined: Wed Aug 09, 2006 3:08 pm

Post by southernmnscout »

midwesthockeyscout wrote:I really don't have an opinion on who is the better player, since both are splendid players, but in terms of draft status, I can tell you, and even if Hockey Scout is around, too, he might throw his words into the mix, that big, scoring forwards are a dime a dozen, and defensemen that can control the game are more rare and much hotter commodities.

The top level scouts will have to believe that Leddy can elevate his defense at the next level in order to be a substantially high draft pick, because under this premise that I have seen over the course of the last few years, the trend has been to take the top talent on defense.
An excellent skating defenseman that can move the puck like he can is a bigger asset to an NHL team come draft time than a big power forward. Now I am not saying that Budish is not an excellent player because he is.

I also think in this case on who will go first it will depend on who is drafting and what they need. I think they will both be picked fairly close to eachother. With all of this being said, I think Leddy will be picked first and Budish will follow shortly after Leddy in the draft. IMO
O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

Budish question

Post by O-townClown »

No way of knowing, but I wonder if Zach Budish winds up being taken early than he would have been had he played his senior year.

The NBA Draft has always shown people can be tantalized by the unknown. Pavel Podklozine was a very early pick out of Poland. I follow the sport closely and have no idea what happened to him. A Frenchman named Weis went about 15th one year.
Be kind. Rewind.
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: Budish question

Post by Goldy Gopher »

O-townClown wrote:No way of knowing, but I wonder if Zach Budish winds up being taken early than he would have been had he played his senior year.

The NBA Draft has always shown people can be tantalized by the unknown. Pavel Podklozine was a very early pick out of Poland. I follow the sport closely and have no idea what happened to him. A Frenchman named Weis went about 15th one year.
Fun fact that shows I have not much to do with my time: He's currently playing in the Russian Super League for Khimki BC.
The U invented swagger.
biscuit in the basket
Posts: 94
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 6:30 pm

Re: Budish question

Post by biscuit in the basket »

Goldy Gopher wrote:
O-townClown wrote:No way of knowing, but I wonder if Zach Budish winds up being taken early than he would have been had he played his senior year.

The NBA Draft has always shown people can be tantalized by the unknown. Pavel Podklozine was a very early pick out of Poland. I follow the sport closely and have no idea what happened to him. A Frenchman named Weis went about 15th one year.
Fun fact that shows I have not much to do with my time: He's currently playing in the Russian Super League for Khimki BC.
Sounds like a better option than playing for the T-Wolves. :lol:
Puck the Sioux, Go Gophers.
edinahornetkid24
Posts: 120
Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2009 12:07 pm
Location: Southwest Mpls

Post by edinahornetkid24 »

never seen leddy play but Budish is very good so I have to say Budish.
starmvp
Posts: 3224
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 6:12 pm
Location: State of Hockey

Post by starmvp »

edinahornetkid24 wrote:never seen leddy play but Budish is very good so I have to say Budish.
How do you know if you have only seen Budish play?
midwesthockeyscout
Posts: 91
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:14 am

Re: really?

Post by midwesthockeyscout »

O-townClown wrote:
midwesthockeyscout wrote:I can tell you, and even if Hockey Scout is around, too, he might throw his words into the mix, that big, scoring forwards are a dime a dozen,
That's funny, because I know an NHL scout and he was talking at Christmas about how rare it is to see big players put the puck in the net.
7 of the top 15 players on Central Scounting's list are defenseman, and then only about 12 of top 30, then it drops off dramatically. This shows the premium on talented defensemen, that, sometimes, teams HAVE to draft for need.

I don't recall the whole draft board from a couple years ago, but when Erik Johnson was selected from the Gophers as the #1 overall pick to St. Louis, there were many who speculated there were better skilled forwards to choose from, but the need for a talent like Johnson was a rare commodity.
Post Reply