Hutchinson (19-7-1) @ Warroad (26-2-0) 3-11-09

elliott70 · Post by **elliott70** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:28 pm

bye u scr n ur dreams.

LakeEffect · Post by **LakeEffect** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 9:58 pm

We've all seen the movie "Miracle on Ice"

Hutchinson 4
Warroad 3

1HOCK1 · Post by **1HOCK1** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 10:05 pm

Hutch 7
Warroad 4

PENSin09 · Post by **PENSin09** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:02 pm

I went to the New Ulm Hutchinson section final game and i can safely say that neither team had more than 2 kids that would play on a top three line at warroad. Hutchinson has one good kid, #4 who is somewhat fast, but that was compared to a very slow New Ulm team. The Hutchinson goalie was shaky too. I am predicting a rather large blowout by warroad, and Hutchinson will be lucky to score maybe once. Good luck though i love upsets. 9 rip in favor of warroad.

1HOCK1 · Post by **1HOCK1** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:22 pm

Hutch has more than one good kid and the goalie is far from Shaky. New Ulm is not slow.

tardy4mr.hockey · Post by **tardy4mr.hockey** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:23 pm

warroad 24
Hutch 3

StonePucksJr · Post by **StonePucksJr** » Tue Mar 10, 2009 11:52 pm

Wish I could see an upset but I think Warroad has seen too many of those in the past few years. I would hope their coach would make sure the game is on their minds. Number 4 isn't Hutch's best player. Biggest thing Hutch has going against them is the lack of experience playing in big arenas. Their games are nowhere near the magnitude as ones in the Gardens. If they can cope with this it won't be a blowout. But if they freeze up it will be an embarassing game. Unless Swenson plays the game of his life and some of the forwards do too they don't have a chance.

Warroad 3
Hutch 1

Lakeviewing · Post by **Lakeviewing** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:06 am

StonePucksJr wrote:Wish I could see an upset but I think Warroad has seen too many of those in the past few years. I would hope their coach would make sure the game is on their minds. Number 4 isn't Hutch's best player. Biggest thing Hutch has going against them is the lack of experience playing in big arenas. Their games are nowhere near the magnitude as ones in the Gardens. If they can cope with this it won't be a blowout. But if they freeze up it will be an embarassing game. Unless Swenson plays the game of his life and some of the forwards do too they don't have a chance.

Warroad 3
Hutch 1

Sorry, the Warroad hockey hot bed, beats the Hutch farming community. Not a rip on Hutch, it been a good run, but Warroad has a commitment to hockey and not a lot of depth to the Hutch team. Hutch probably will play down to two lines.

bombsquad06 · Post by **bombsquad06** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:22 am

Hutch 3 Warroad 2 if Hutch's goalie shows up and 4 and 27 can get on the PP or behind the Warroad D.

Warroad is so good what are they doing playing A? Trophy Chasing??

hshckfan08 · Post by **hshckfan08** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 1:39 am

bombsquad06 wrote:Hutch 3 Warroad 2 if Hutch's goalie shows up and 4 and 27 can get on the PP or behind the Warroad D.

Warroad is so good what are they doing playing A? Trophy Chasing??

Thats great logic.. Lets have every good team go to AA so we can watch sleepy eye, moose lake, bagley, north branch, silver bay, lake of the woods, central and waseca in the A tourney!

nipeshow18 · Post by **nipeshow18** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:46 am

hshckfan08 wrote:
bombsquad06 wrote:Hutch 3 Warroad 2 if Hutch's goalie shows up and 4 and 27 can get on the PP or behind the Warroad D.

Warroad is so good what are they doing playing A? Trophy Chasing??
Thats great logic.. Lets have every good team go to AA so we can watch sleepy eye, moose lake, bagley, north branch, silver bay, lake of the woods, central and waseca in the A tourney!

Although I agree with your point, he also has a point. The common argument for no they shouldn't is well... Roseau did it.

But I do totally agree with you, it would be a shame for all of the good class A teams to opt up.

I.score.do.you.16. · Post by **I.score.do.you.16.** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 8:52 am

1HOCK1 wrote:Hutch has more than one good kid and the goalie is far from Shaky. New Ulm is not slow.

Hutch's goalie is very shaky. And New Ulm is slow other than one player.

bigeater3 · Post by **bigeater3** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:07 am

the only chance hutch has is if their first line was chuck norris, ditka, and charlie from the mighty ducks. otherwise GAME OVER!

Green and White Fan · Post by **Green and White Fan** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:23 am

Warroad should roll in this one and I believe will be the class A state champs this year.

pondhockey10 · Post by **pondhockey10** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 9:48 am

I'm going to have to agree with the majority on this one Warroad will coast through this game. . . thats not a cut at Hutch its just they dont have depth to keep up and let alone the expierence that Warroad has. congrats on making it though Hutch good way to build a solid program.

Warroad-6
Hutch-1

StonePucksJr · Post by **StonePucksJr** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 12:08 pm

Lakeviewing wrote:
StonePucksJr wrote:Wish I could see an upset but I think Warroad has seen too many of those in the past few years. I would hope their coach would make sure the game is on their minds. Number 4 isn't Hutch's best player. Biggest thing Hutch has going against them is the lack of experience playing in big arenas. Their games are nowhere near the magnitude as ones in the Gardens. If they can cope with this it won't be a blowout. But if they freeze up it will be an embarassing game. Unless Swenson plays the game of his life and some of the forwards do too they don't have a chance.

Warroad 3
Hutch 1
Sorry, the Warroad hockey hot bed, beats the Hutch farming community. Not a rip on Hutch, it been a good run, but Warroad has a commitment to hockey and not a lot of depth to the Hutch team. Hutch probably will play down to two lines.

Yeah I thought I covered the fact that Hutch stands no chance. To make it clearer I was stating that if all went good on the Hutch side, Warroad would win by 2 over Hutch. I'm proud of the boys to overcome the traditional "Hutch Sucks" aura but anyone being honest should think that unless theres a miracle, Hutch doesn't have a chance to win. However I have to say Warroad is more of a farming community then Hutch. Marvin window is probably the only thing that holds farming off as the majority of the community jobs. I actually don't think there are any farming kids on Hutch's team anymore.

MNHockeyDieHard · Post by **MNHockeyDieHard** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:31 pm

After the first period:

Warroad 1 (shorty)
Hutch 0

Warroad has completely dominated play despite having three penalties and no power plays. Hutch's goalie has looked solid but it doesn't look good.

Indians forever · Post by **Indians forever** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:33 pm

MNHockeyDieHard wrote:After the first period:

Warroad 1 (shorty)
Hutch 0

Warroad has completely dominated play despite having three penalties and no power plays. Hutch's goalie has looked solid but it doesn't look good.

Never know he could break!!

adamp1914 · Post by **adamp1914** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:51 pm

2 - 0 Warroad.

Actually a closer score than I would have thought.

MNHockeyFan · Post by **MNHockeyFan** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 2:56 pm

Hutch scores and makes it 2-1. Still in the 2nd period.

slashman42 · Post by **slashman42** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:04 pm

Hutch commits penalties, Warroad makes them pay. 2 goals within about 10 seconds, now 4-1 Warroad.

Hutch just committed another penalty. The floodgates, they be opening...

MNHockeyDieHard · Post by **MNHockeyDieHard** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:11 pm

After 2 periods:

Warroad 4
Hutch 1 (3 shots)

Score doesnt tell the story of the game. This one is ugly.

moe_lester · Post by **moe_lester** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:23 pm

MNHockeyDieHard wrote:After 2 periods:

Warroad 4
Hutch 1 (3 shots)

Score doesnt tell the story of the game. This one is ugly.

thats for sure, i see warroad adding at least 2 more in the 3rd and brock nelson getting a trick

slashman42 · Post by **slashman42** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:27 pm

Good Call Moe!

Brock with the hatty on the PP - now 5-1 early in the third.

moe_lester · Post by **moe_lester** » Wed Mar 11, 2009 3:28 pm

moe_lester wrote:
MNHockeyDieHard wrote:After 2 periods:

Warroad 4
Hutch 1 (3 shots)

Score doesnt tell the story of the game. This one is ugly.
thats for sure, i see warroad adding at least 2 more in the 3rd and brock nelson getting a trick

who called it, brock nelson with the trick, could he drop 4?

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

Hutchinson (19-7-1) @ Warroad (26-2-0) 3-11-09

Who advances to the semifinals?

Warroad wins

Re: Warroad wins