Best Bantam B player

mnhockey9312 · Post by **mnhockey9312** » Wed Mar 04, 2009 10:23 pm

College Scout 1212 wrote:
MN hockey08 wrote:
College Scout 1212 wrote: Broberg can't skate at all. He can't hit. All he has is a decent shot. Schubert is terrible. He didn't do anything vs. my team. He is really cocky for being such a bad player.
wow kid what team do u play for?? if you even knew schubert you would know that hes the farthest thing from cocky, and i bet hes twice the player you are he works his butt off every game. Broberg is also a good player he controls the game when hes out there. so u can stop making false comments about kids u dont even know cuz i bet you are not even near as good as either of these kids.
You don't know anything. Schubert didn't do anything when we played his team.(We beat them). In the same tournament Applevalley was in. We were in their pool and they tied them. Broberg does not controll the play because hes fat and can't do anything but shoot.

True dat

gohawk4 · Post by **gohawk4** » Fri Mar 06, 2009 8:29 am

allday14 wrote:none of these kids match up to any of the kids from eden prairies team a few years back. half of the team plays ep varsity now (including their goalie) one is at ssm, one is play aha varsity, and another plays for sta. i think they lost 3 games all year

That is a big statement that all 17 players on EP's team were better than any other player this year. Wayzata Blue only lost 1 game and Sauk Rapids only lost 2, i believe. That is great that you can go back and brag about your Bantam B1 team 5 years later, but unless you have seen some of these kids or wait 5 years for them to be your age, that is a bold statement.

hudini3 · Post by **hudini3** » Mon Mar 16, 2009 9:36 pm

I would say go to the south region, but again I have not seen many of these players play so I don't know the talent level.

I was at the south region tournament and they looked pretty good. Minneapolis Park was a solid B1 team with a lot of depth. they were all big, fast, and controlled the play. There were no specific standouts...they were all great.The top line for Faribault also looked good. I think they were numbers 3,19, and 10. Also, River Lakes' number 39 was decent. Waseca was good, but they looked like they didn't want to win.