2009 advanced 15
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 184
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2008 9:24 am
Observer:
From the MN Hockey site regarding the festival:
Player Evaluation: A team of knowledgeable coaches and scouts will evaluate all participants, consult with team coaches and select the top 102 players for participation in the Minnesota Hockey Summer Advanced 15 Festival. Alternates will also be chosen and placed if there are participant turndowns.
I direct you to the line, "consult with team coaches and select the top 102 players for participation". Yes, they evaluate all of the participants. But, then they consult with team coaches. I would believe that a team coach could trump a pick by saying that they felt that a player was clearly superior to the competition.
From the MN Hockey site regarding the festival:
Player Evaluation: A team of knowledgeable coaches and scouts will evaluate all participants, consult with team coaches and select the top 102 players for participation in the Minnesota Hockey Summer Advanced 15 Festival. Alternates will also be chosen and placed if there are participant turndowns.
I direct you to the line, "consult with team coaches and select the top 102 players for participation". Yes, they evaluate all of the participants. But, then they consult with team coaches. I would believe that a team coach could trump a pick by saying that they felt that a player was clearly superior to the competition.
tenoverpar, I personally have only seen him play once and that was the day he broke his collarbone, that I know of anyway...I probably saw him play or coached a team against his over the last few years but didn't know it. I also know that he played for Benilde varsity. So my personal knowledge of him is lacking. Reputation says that he's pretty good.
From the one time I saw him and knew who I was watching. I would say he was very good. But his partner in that game, Alec Anderson, was also very good and Alec didn't make the cut.
Though, I would like to add that I never questioned whether or not he was good enough to make the top 102. The process is what I was calling attention to. The participants are told that the group that is in New Hope on that particular weekend is the group that is being evaluated for the next step in the process. These types of things can lead to the feeling that there are politics at play etc etc.
From the one time I saw him and knew who I was watching. I would say he was very good. But his partner in that game, Alec Anderson, was also very good and Alec didn't make the cut.
Though, I would like to add that I never questioned whether or not he was good enough to make the top 102. The process is what I was calling attention to. The participants are told that the group that is in New Hope on that particular weekend is the group that is being evaluated for the next step in the process. These types of things can lead to the feeling that there are politics at play etc etc.
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 10:00 am
I have to agree with the others. If this was "politics", it was pretty minimal. The coaches are part of the eval. process and the kids who were at New Hope WERE evaluated and considered. So was this kid and, by all accounts, deserves to be on the list.ctbrow1 wrote:tenoverpar, I personally have only seen him play once and that was the day he broke his collarbone, that I know of anyway...I probably saw him play or coached a team against his over the last few years but didn't know it. I also know that he played for Benilde varsity. So my personal knowledge of him is lacking. Reputation says that he's pretty good.
From the one time I saw him and knew who I was watching. I would say he was very good. But his partner in that game, Alec Anderson, was also very good and Alec didn't make the cut.
Though, I would like to add that I never questioned whether or not he was good enough to make the top 102. The process is what I was calling attention to. The participants are told that the group that is in New Hope on that particular weekend is the group that is being evaluated for the next step in the process. These types of things can lead to the feeling that there are politics at play etc etc.
-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Tue Mar 31, 2009 5:26 pm
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:21 pm
Epkids
No ep kids. What happened? Seems hard to believe
-
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 9:26 pm
Re: Epkids
Not that surprising. EP just didn't have the level of players they have had in previous years. Besides alomost all of Ep's Bantam A was 1st yearshockeydad11 wrote:No ep kids. What happened? Seems hard to believe
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:21 pm
Epkids
So who will be the best returning player on there team?
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: Fri May 08, 2009 6:21 pm
Epkids
if i had a kid on ep that was a 94 id know and wouldnt have to ask. so obviously i dont.
-
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Mon Dec 01, 2008 11:48 am
-
- Posts: 2569
- Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2004 11:40 pm
michealson looked good and what i really liked about him as a player is he passed the puck. the kid has great vision. for goalie number 1 on the white team played outstanding i think he was from mpls park. for d i really liked pilot number 2 on the white team played great and halverson from wayzata. i dont know why but defense is a hard position for me to judge when it comes down to all these good players. some other forwards i thought played good were lovik,besse,vesel,roo, and lavalle he looked pretty strong. Lawdermilt and janze work hard and made good things happen. almost all the players were solid i seen a few that were out of place. befor anyone gets upset this is who i happend to notice their was other kids im sure that were having a great weekend i cant claim to be everywhere or see everything. i also cant judge players perfectly and it wasnt my job to do so. just thought i would let some of you know who may not have had the chance to watch on some of my opinions.
-
- Posts: 245
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 10:50 am
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2009 3:39 pm