Cambridge Isanti and North Branch combining?

CLDafencemen17 · Post by **CLDafencemen17** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 8:11 pm

MrBoDangles wrote:
CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much
I was able to watch the scrimmage tonight, "GARBAGE" they are not! NB tied a very good (I will admit) CL team 7-7. After being up 5-0 NB lost their intensity and let the lead slip away. NB will have a couple very dominant lines next season and Jarret Sachs and Lane Noyes (played tonight at about 50%) will be among the best players in class A (not that class matters).
Watch what you say about other teams, you're only making your own look less credible.....

NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Sun Jul 19, 2009 10:26 pm

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 1:44 pm

MrBoDangles wrote:
CLDafencemen17 wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote: I was able to watch the scrimmage tonight, "GARBAGE" they are not! NB tied a very good (I will admit) CL team 7-7. After being up 5-0 NB lost their intensity and let the lead slip away. NB will have a couple very dominant lines next season and Jarret Sachs and Lane Noyes (played tonight at about 50%) will be among the best players in class A (not that class matters).
Watch what you say about other teams, you're only making your own look less credible.....
NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game
NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??

TellItHowItIs · Post by **TellItHowItIs** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 2:02 pm

Am I really reading all of this correctly

NB or CL at State. ??? Really??

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:08 pm

TellItHowItIs wrote:Am I really reading all of this correctly NB or CL at State. ??? Really??

I was trying to awaken the kid to CL's chances....... I don't believe I'm getting through to him

. They will have a chance to make some noise in the North Suburban conference in the next couple years...... 2nd or 3rd possibly.

nhockey33 · Post by **nhockey33** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:35 pm

MrBoDangles wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
CLDafencemen17 wrote: NB did not lose their intensity they were getting outplayed ALL night they could barely break the puck out cause CL had them bottled up nearly the whole game. CL did not put many quality shots on net in the first half and the NB goaltender played really well in the first half. In the second have CL pulled their heads out and outscored NB 7-2. And then beat them in the shootout 8-2. In addition CL was missing their top goaltender top two forwards and two of their top defensemen for this game
NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??

how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:26 am

nhockey33 wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote: NB was missing top players also........YOUR TEAM WOULD NEVER MATCH NB'S TOP LINE! NB was up 5-0 after the first session (dominated the first 50 minute session) and former CL coach Randy G DIDN'T want to make it ugly so he changed up the lineups. MAYBE NB WILL BE IN THE STATE TOURNAMENT INSTEAD OF CL!!??
how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett

Ment to be just Lane....

nhockey33 · Post by **nhockey33** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 11:56 am

MrBoDangles wrote:
nhockey33 wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
how is jarrett at50% i know lane is but how is jarrett
Ment to be just Lane....

he might be having surgery i guess

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Thu Jul 23, 2009 9:30 pm

CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much

"Garbage"- (NB) Beat CL 12-7 Tonight!.......... CL lost to Cambridge last week by 1

steelheader · Post by **steelheader** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 8:12 am

This thread needs to be put to bed.

These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 12:16 pm

steelheader wrote:This thread needs to be put to bed.

These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).

Simmer down! Just showing the CL boy that NB can hang.......Not that NB can beat a Cambridge varsity team, if you would have read through you would have understood that........NB WOULD have a very good showing on a merged team though

BodyShots · Post by **BodyShots** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 3:16 pm

MrBoDangles wrote:
steelheader wrote:This thread needs to be put to bed.

These are jv and bantam players and maybe 3 returning varsity players (for Cambridge anyway and I really hope NB and CL).
Simmer down! Just showing the CL boy that NB can hang.......Not that NB can beat a Cambridge varsity team, if you would have read through you would have understood that........NB WOULD have a very good showing on a merged team though

And so would every other team in the state!

MrBoDangles · Post by **MrBoDangles** » Fri Jul 24, 2009 4:50 pm

CLDafencemen17 wrote:this is the stupidest idea ever! CI has enough players as it is.. plus most if not all of the NB players are garbage. we just scrimmaged them and tossed their salad.. only a few nb players would makke the team anyhow... And North branch just got a great new head coach Randy Gendreau.. he is a great coach but he also does not like the CI coach that much

BodyShots? Pffffff... More like taken a few headshots....