2009-2010

atlthrashers74 · Post by **atlthrashers74** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:28 am

so then when are sections 1 and 3 going to be really strong?....

keepyourheadup · Post by **keepyourheadup** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:00 pm

When there kids stay home and play, till then no time soon.

Hoops · Post by **Hoops** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 3:17 pm

atlthrashers74 wrote:so then when are sections 1 and 3 going to be really strong?....

Try next yr for 3.

deacon · Post by **deacon** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 6:41 pm

I know you guys are doing all AA schools, but STA will be a top 5 team this coming season, regardless of classes.

keepyourheadup · Post by **keepyourheadup** » Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:10 pm

you're right deacon, with a bunch of section 1 players from one school.

atlthrashers74 · Post by **atlthrashers74** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:29 am

Hoops wrote:
atlthrashers74 wrote:so then when are sections 1 and 3 going to be really strong?....
Try next yr for 3.

section three will not be even close to sections 2,4,5,6, and 7

Hoops · Post by **Hoops** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 12:39 pm

atlthrashers74 wrote:
Hoops wrote:
atlthrashers74 wrote:so then when are sections 1 and 3 going to be really strong?....
Try next yr for 3.

section three will not be even close to sections 2,4,5,6, and 7

Wrong. If you think Cretin, AV, Woodbury, and Eagan will be weak next yr...you haven't been watching.

atlthrashers74 · Post by **atlthrashers74** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 3:42 pm

Hoops wrote:
atlthrashers74 wrote:
Hoops wrote: Try next yr for 3.

section three will not be even close to sections 2,4,5,6, and 7
Wrong. If you think Cretin, AV, Woodbury, and Eagan will be weak next yr...you haven't been watching.

I know Woodbury will be good, and Cretin will be top 15 but the rest of them will not be top 15

Post by **karl(east)** » Tue Jul 21, 2009 10:06 pm

atlthrashers74 wrote:
Hoops wrote:Wrong. If you think Cretin, AV, Woodbury, and Eagan will be weak next yr...you haven't been watching.
I know Woodbury will be good, and Cretin will be top 15 but the rest of them will not be top 15

Don't underestimate AV. They probably won't start in the top 15, but I'd look out for them this year.

If I had to rank the sections by strength right now, it'd be a toss-up between 3 and 5 for third-best (behind 6 and 2, in that order).

northwoods oldtimer · Post by **northwoods oldtimer** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 8:19 am

Karl is correct AV will be good. I expect them to be pretty tough the next 3 seasons. Assuming Woodbury did not lose hockey players to the new school they will be very good also. Along with CDH you are looking at 3 formidable clubs in the section this season. Not as deep as other sections but 3 very good teams.

Goldy23 · Post by **Goldy23** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 10:17 am

deacon wrote:I know you guys are doing all AA schools, but STA will be a top 5 team this coming season, regardless of classes.

Agreed. And the Mustangs will be a top 3 team in either class!

Doglover · Post by **Doglover** » Wed Jul 22, 2009 11:31 pm

What about Hill Murray? I just haven't been overly impressed with their individual players but they seem to be achieving success. Maybe I'm missing it. Agree AV will be strong and I bet Jefferson may surprise many and be a contender if their players stick around for senior year.

northwoods oldtimer · Thu Jul 23, 2009 12:19 pm

Pre Season Top 10 AA:
BSM
Bloominton Jefferson
Eden Praire
Minnetonka
CDH
Blaine
Centennial
Hill
Holy Angels
Duluth East
Others cracking the top 10 during the season:
Apple Valley, Elk River, Edina, Moorhead, Woodbury, Grand Rapids

atlthrashers74 · Post by **atlthrashers74** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 1:38 am

so combining all the thoughts that people have posted the top 20 is/would be

EP
Tonka
BSM
Jefferson
Hill
AHA
Blaine
Centennial
Duluth East
Edina
Woodbury
Hopkins
Cretin
WBL
Elk River
Apple Valley
Moorhead
Tartan
Burnsville
Grand Rapids

Northsider · Post by **Northsider** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 2:50 pm

karl(east) wrote: Don't underestimate AV. They probably won't start in the top 15, but I'd look out for them this year.

If I had to rank the sections by strength right now, it'd be a toss-up between 3 and 5 for third-best (behind 6 and 2, in that order).

No, I think section 4 with Hill, White Bear, Stillwater, and Tartan is the third best, with 5,3,7 after them in that order.

5 might be a little better, but definitely not 3.

By the Way, the top ten will be:

BSM
Hill
EP
Tonka
Jefferson
Grand Rapids
White Bear
Blaine
Centennial
Woodbury/Duluth East (tossup)

Post by **karl(east)** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 4:14 pm

Northsider wrote:
karl(east) wrote: Don't underestimate AV. They probably won't start in the top 15, but I'd look out for them this year.

If I had to rank the sections by strength right now, it'd be a toss-up between 3 and 5 for third-best (behind 6 and 2, in that order).
No, I think section 4 with Hill, White Bear, Stillwater, and Tartan is the third best, with 5,3,7 after them in that order.

5 might be a little better, but definitely not 3.

By the Way, the top ten will be:

BSM
Hill
EP
Tonka
Jefferson
Grand Rapids
White Bear
Blaine
Centennial
Woodbury/Duluth East (tossup)

I'll buy Hill, but not the other three. Stillwater and Tartan are good teams, but I wouldn't rank either of them as high as the second-best team in 3AA or 5AA. And, out of curiosity, why are you putting WBL so high? I was under the impression that this coming year will be a down year.

I'm not ready to rank them all with numbers yet, but I will do them in tiers:

Tier 1
EP
Tonka
Jefferson
BSM

Tier 2
Blaine
Hill
AHA
Woodbury
Moorhead
CDH

Tier 3
Elk River
Centennial
Edina
Duluth East
Wayzata

Tier 4
Apple Valley
Stillwater
Tartan
Maple Grove

Tier 5
WBL
Hopkins
Andover
Grand Rapids
Eagan

Sections ranked, by strength: 6,2,3,5,4,7,8,1.

I'll stick numbers in front of the names when we get closer to the season.

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 6:55 pm

karl(east) wrote:
Northsider wrote:
karl(east) wrote: Don't underestimate AV. They probably won't start in the top 15, but I'd look out for them this year.

If I had to rank the sections by strength right now, it'd be a toss-up between 3 and 5 for third-best (behind 6 and 2, in that order).
No, I think section 4 with Hill, White Bear, Stillwater, and Tartan is the third best, with 5,3,7 after them in that order.

5 might be a little better, but definitely not 3.

By the Way, the top ten will be:

BSM
Hill
EP
Tonka
Jefferson
Grand Rapids
White Bear
Blaine
Centennial
Woodbury/Duluth East (tossup)
I'll buy Hill, but not the other three. Stillwater and Tartan are good teams, but I wouldn't rank either of them as high as the second-best team in 3AA or 5AA. And, out of curiosity, why are you putting WBL so high? I was under the impression that this coming year will be a down year.

I'm not ready to rank them all with numbers yet, but I will do them in tiers:

Tier 1
EP
Tonka
Jefferson
BSM

Tier 2
Blaine
Hill
AHA
Woodbury
Moorhead
CDH

Tier 3
Elk River
Centennial
Edina
Duluth East
Wayzata

Tier 4
Apple Valley
Stillwater
Tartan
Maple Grove

Tier 5
WBL
Hopkins
Andover
Grand Rapids
Eagan

Sections ranked, by strength: 6,2,3,5,4,7,8,1.

I'll stick numbers in front of the names when we get closer to the season.

The tier system was a good idea Karl!

My obvious bias aside, I think the White Bear team is still up in the air, and it's one of those things that is very hard to project at this point.

I hope, for my own sake, that WBL does as well as many of you (suprisingly!) predict!

brandy38 · Post by **brandy38** » Sat Jul 25, 2009 11:35 pm

It's interesting to see all the good predictions for Hopkins. Who do they have aside from their goalie?

Also: aren't their lower youth levels really low on numbers? I know that question pertains to the youth hockey forum, but if their youth system has low numbers, that doesn't bode well for future success of the HS team.

youngblood08 · Post by **youngblood08** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 9:42 am

Hopkins shouldn't have gotten the attention it got last year. It was rewarded for what we'll call the "Travis Boyd effect" yes he put up some numbers but the team finished 4 games over .500 last year and was 1 nad done in the playoffs. Hockey is a team game and a team should be rated based on that fact, not over hyped due to one player. Kids getting credit for scoring a ton of points vs weak competition is getting old.

39 pts in below average squads such as Irondale, North Metro, NSP, Rogers, Virginia, Bloom Kennedy, Shakopee, St Louis Park, Richfield, Buffalo and Armstrong

12 pts, 5 on the PP in games vs Rosemount, Eagan, SSP, Tonka, Edina, Wayzata and EP

rinkrat555 · Post by **rinkrat555** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:37 am

and rosemount was not too good last year

hockeyman84 · Post by **hockeyman84** » Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:40 pm

youngblood08 wrote:Hopkins shouldn't have gotten the attention it got last year. It was rewarded for what we'll call the "Travis Boyd effect" yes he put up some numbers but the team finished 4 games over .500 last year and was 1 nad done in the playoffs. Hockey is a team game and a team should be rated based on that fact, not over hyped due to one player. Kids getting credit for scoring a ton of points vs weak competition is getting old.

39 pts in below average squads such as Irondale, North Metro, NSP, Rogers, Virginia, Bloom Kennedy, Shakopee, St Louis Park, Richfield, Buffalo and Armstrong

12 pts, 5 on the PP in games vs Rosemount, Eagan, SSP, Tonka, Edina, Wayzata and EP

I don't know about you but 12 points in 7 games against that competition dosn't seem like something to complain about and I don't know how you can say Virginia was a below average team when they seemed to have a very strong season. Also Richfield, NSP, Rogers and St. Louis Park were not walks in the park for Hopkins and Boyd got points to keep his team in those games. But I do agree Hopkins was way overrated and I belive they will have a very difficult season this year.

MedleyWR · Post by **MedleyWR** » Mon Jul 27, 2009 8:20 am

Doglover wrote:What about Hill Murray? I just haven't been overly impressed with their individual players but they seem to be achieving success. Maybe I'm missing it. Agree AV will be strong and I bet Jefferson may surprise many and be a contender if their players stick around for senior year.

Hill Murray had a very good recruiting season and should field a strong team.

Northsider · Post by **Northsider** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 10:29 am

Yes. Many kids have decided they wanted to play for a winning team and Lechner will gladly welcome them on board.

BodyShots · Post by **BodyShots** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 1:53 pm

Northsider wrote:Yes. Many kids have decided they wanted to play for a winning team and Lechner will gladly welcome them on board.

Gee, I thought kids went their for the schooling. Or was it the extra curricular activities!

nopuckluck · Post by **nopuckluck** » Tue Jul 28, 2009 5:27 pm

Don't forget Breck. The team that won the Class A title only lost two seniors (Rehkamp and Hurd). In recent STP action they beat Blaine 4-1 and the Bengals had Bjugstad, Scheid, Larson and other gunners plus Danny Harper in net. They'll have three guys get some good seasoning in the Elite League this Fall: forwards Tyson Fulton and Mike Morin and goaltender John Russell. Forward Riley Borer is an Elite League alternate. Good team speed, decent defense and strong goaltending.

HighSchoolHockeyForums.com

2009-2010

3 AA

Pre Season Picks AA

2009-10