rj........I completely agree with your comment on the associations responsibility to develope their own players. The goal of top organizations like Blaine should be to expose as many girls as possible to A level competition. There will always be complaints on who makes the A team's but what is most disturbing about this situation is that the team only kept 11 skaters. There were move-in's and the board allowed a skinny roster.rj04 wrote:SECoach, who is this benefitting? What good does it do to not help your association. This is not what is good for the game, this is what is good for the team. So some girls get to play A, they could have in there own association. The girl that does not belong, how does she get better. You're a fool if you think this is gonna bring in new girls to the program. All this says is that the only thing they are interested in is winning and no one will develop. It says if you are not good enough don't look to your own association for development. Fools!!!!
I tried to get 17 on our roster this year but wasn't allowed because it messed up our B's. Could you imagine how good Edina would be with 11 skaters? At the sametime, how do you think Edina got so deep in talent? They ran over 30 players at the A level against the best competition in the state. Guess what...the state champs are returning 14 A players from last year.
If the rules were followed with the move-in's.......fine....but to make an administrative decision to also reduce the roster and limit the opportunity for girls to play A hockey is wrong. Year after year I have seen examples of the top 11 players on a team pulling the lower 4 player up to the next level of skill. That is the ultimate learning environment and I believe the organization just missed a golden opportunity to step up the overall depth of their girls program.