hockeyheaven wrote:The State’s deepest section may just be the most competitive one for the 2009-10 season. In my opinion it should be a four team contest. Stillwater and Hill may have the only two top flight net minders in the field, but may have depth issues. Roseville and WBL look to be the deepest top to bottom but goaltending may be an issue. Things to consider in the next 3 months are;
1. Can Hill find a second scoring line and will they have enough defense to support a star on the rise in Mckeever (hope she don’t go down).
2. Can WBL find more scoring? Stay out of the box? (improving one might improve the other) Defense should be their strength but will the goaltending be there?
3. Roseville should be the favorite (however we’ve said that before). Need to finally live up to the expectations. Like WBL, defense will be a strength, and like Hill, will they have a second scoring line? Not as high on their goalie situation as others seem to be.
4. Stillwater looks the strongest on paper. Best goalie, two scoring lines, but do they have enough defense to contend?
Let the games begin.
I'll disagree with one point and tell you you're wrong about another.
I'll disagree that goaltending is an issue with Roseville. A positive issue yes, not negative. This came up last year at this time too, although not
during the 24-2-1 season. Not sure where the idea comes from--how do you lose only two games (both to the State Championship game participants) with suspect goaltending? The numbers: You might dismiss GAA, where the D shares the credit. But the two goalies had a save % of 93.8% combined (.5 better than Stillwater's #1, 1.5 better than HM's, and 3 pts. better than the WBL tandem). To dismiss that you have to believe that Stillwater (3 games), WBL (3 games) Moundview (2 games) plus GRG, Hopkins, and Edina aren't able to create quality shots or scoring chances. And if you do disregard those numbers, then any Roseville fan will tell you they have complete confidence in their goalies because it was never a weakness last year but a strength.
And now where you're absolutely wrong--questioning whether they have a 'second scoring line'. Like many others, you mistakenly assume that their two leading scorers (57 and 50 pts respectively) skate on the same line. They don't. They share time on special teams, but that's it (and even then one of them drops back to play point). So which do you consider the first line, the one with all three players returning (47 goals) or the one with the Golden Gopher recruit?
If your favorite team is basing success vs. Roseville on questionable goaltending and a weak 2nd line, good luck to them.