South St. Paul

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
Theclassicburbs
Posts: 27
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 10:03 pm

South St. Paul

Post by Theclassicburbs »

Coming off a few bright years in which the Packers under Jeff Lagoo produced numerous division I prospects such as Wilcox, Faulk, Palmquist, are they going to be competitive once again?
High Flyer
Posts: 464
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 12:13 am

Re: South St. Paul

Post by High Flyer »

Theclassicburbs wrote:Coming off a few bright years in which the Packers under Jeff Lagoo produced numerous division I prospects such as Wilcox, Faulk, Palmquist, are they going to be competitive once again?
I don't think it would be fair to say that Lagooo produced Faulk, but he can take some credit for Palmquist.

They will be a much different team with out Palmquist this year. I thought he was one of the best defensive defensemen I saw last year, quitely going about his business. Sometimes you didn't even knew he was there, until he would decide step up offensivly.

Wilcox is good enough to keep them in most games, so as long as he is in net, they will be competitive.
Hockeywatcher123
Posts: 146
Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2009 2:57 pm

Post by Hockeywatcher123 »

as long as they have wilcox they will be a team you cant overlook, but they will not be as good as years prior
thiscrazygame
Posts: 92
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2008 4:54 pm

Post by thiscrazygame »

Hockeywatcher123 wrote:as long as they have wilcox they will be a team you cant overlook, but they will not be as good as years prior
Anyone know how SSP did on their scrimmages this weekend.
ilivegreen60
Posts: 57
Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 10:17 pm

Post by ilivegreen60 »

didn't know 3 was NUMEROUS. with Wilcox they do stand a chance against decently good teams this year, but they just don't have the depth they've had the last few years.
Post Reply