2009-10 Scores

northshore guy · Post by **northshore guy** » Fri Jan 15, 2010 10:37 pm

any word on the Farmington-Red Wing game??

Gov78 · Post by **Gov78** » Sat Jan 16, 2010 5:16 pm

Final

Tonka - 4
Hopkins - 1

trojangoalie241 · Post by **trojangoalie241** » Sat Jan 16, 2010 6:00 pm

Duluth-4
Roseau-1

joehockey · Post by **joehockey** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 6:44 am

CDH 3 Stillwater 2 - Big win for CDH down 2-0 scored 3 goals in last 8 minutes of game to win

Second: S-Cartony (Hewes, Salmen), 13:47, pp.

Third: S-O'Brien (Krueger), 5:16; CDH-Flood (Fischer), 9:04; CDH-Stein (Kinsel), 10:18, pp; CDH-Ryan (Kinsel, Nicholson), 14:11, pp.

Saves:
S-Sobczak, 6-2-10-18;
CDH-Bangle, 9-10-12-31.

Just_Another_Fan · Post by **Just_Another_Fan** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:14 am

joehockey wrote:CDH 3 Stillwater 2 - Big win for CDH down 2-0 scored 3 goals in last 8 minutes of game to win

Second: S-Cartony (Hewes, Salmen), 13:47, pp.

Third: S-O'Brien (Krueger), 5:16; CDH-Flood (Fischer), 9:04; CDH-Stein (Kinsel), 10:18, pp; CDH-Ryan (Kinsel, Nicholson), 14:11, pp.

Saves:
S-Sobczak, 6-2-10-18;
CDH-Bangle, 9-10-12-31.

MNhockeylover · Post by **MNhockeylover** » Sun Jan 17, 2010 1:45 pm

what happened??

northhockey · Post by **northhockey** » Mon Jan 18, 2010 7:24 pm

1/15 PHM 5 Crookston 1
1/16 Warraod 8 PHM 0

joehockey · Post by **joehockey** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:04 pm

HM 7 - NSP 4

First: H-Bobrowski (Cusick, McDowell), 12:59.

Second: H-M. Brandt (Pendleton), 6:27, pp; N-Bothwell (O'Brien, Kane), 8:37; N-O'Brien (Bothwell, Knutson), 11:31, pp; H-H. Brandt, 13:19, pp; N-Kane (Bothwell, O'Brien), 14:11; H-McDowell (Cusick, Bobrowski), 15:28.

Third: N-Chartrand (Barrett, Pogreba), 1:51; H-Doyle (Pendleton), 4:12, pp; H-H. Brandt (Pendleton, Magill), 9:17; H-McDowell (Cusick, Bobrowski), 11:40.

Saves:
H-McKeever 7-10-8--25;
N-Snell 10-9-11--30

24checking · Post by **24checking** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 10:32 pm

SWC-8 Forest Lake 1

hockeywild7 · Post by **hockeywild7** » Tue Jan 19, 2010 11:12 pm

Stillwater 10 Hastings 0

grlzhockeyrocks · Post by **grlzhockeyrocks** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 1:52 pm

I wouldn't read too much into the Stillwater score, Hastings has been without their starting goalie since going into the third period of the Mounds View game. She mentioned the word "headache" after a scrum in front of the net and the next thing you know she is sitting for 2 weeks. Their backup has no real JV or Varsity experience and is coming off of knee surgery and being back in the lineup for just a month. No excuse as you need to score goals to win but it becomes disheartening when 3 out of the first 5 shots on your net go in.

A little miffed that Stillwater kept playing their first line in the third period with a bench full of JV kids. Either it was revenge for their past poor performance or them looking to pad their big shots stats. Pretty classless. This one will be burned in the memories of future Hastings kids and will certainly be used as motivation for years to come.

hockeya1a · Post by **hockeya1a** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 2:05 pm

grlzhockeyrocks wrote:I wouldn't read too much into the Stillwater score, Hastings has been without their starting goalie since going into the third period of the Mounds View game. She mentioned the word "headache" after a scrum in front of the net and the next thing you know she is sitting for 2 weeks. Their backup has no real JV or Varsity experience and is coming off of knee surgery and being back in the lineup for just a month. No excuse as you need to score goals to win but it becomes disheartening when 3 out of the first 5 shots on your net go in.

A little miffed that Stillwater kept playing their first line in the third period with a bench full of JV kids. Either it was revenge for their past poor performance or them looking to pad their big shots stats. Pretty classless. This one will be burned in the memories of future Hastings kids and will certainly be used as motivation for years to come.

Just my opinion, But when a team is up by several goals to 0 maybe the top line should be resting, But yes it is seen way to often, But numbers do look impressive,

hockeywild7 · Post by **hockeywild7** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 3:35 pm

If you were really at the game you would have seen that the entire 3rd period Stillwater played their JV line pretty much every other shift so I have no idea what game you were watching. I think their top 2 lines only saw 1 or 2 shifts. They killed a penalty or two with all JV players. Not sure what you mean by a bench full of JV kids either. How many "JV" players do you think they carry? Teams can only carry an extra line and 1 or 2 defenseman. Is that your bench full of JV players? I guess some people just like to take shots at the program without knowing what they are talking about. The score was 3-0 after 1st and 9-0 after 2nd. Stillwater only scored 1 goal in the 3rd so I am not sure how that is being classless and running up the score.

gogogophers35 · Post by **gogogophers35** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 6:08 pm

grlzhockeyrocks wrote:I wouldn't read too much into the Stillwater score, Hastings has been without their starting goalie since going into the third period of the Mounds View game. She mentioned the word "headache" after a scrum in front of the net and the next thing you know she is sitting for 2 weeks. Their backup has no real JV or Varsity experience and is coming off of knee surgery and being back in the lineup for just a month. No excuse as you need to score goals to win but it becomes disheartening when 3 out of the first 5 shots on your net go in.

A little miffed that Stillwater kept playing their first line in the third period with a bench full of JV kids. Either it was revenge for their past poor performance or them looking to pad their big shots stats. Pretty classless. This one will be burned in the memories of future Hastings kids and will certainly be used as motivation for years to come.

It just goes to show you don't show up at the defending state champs house with a back-up Goalie and no offense.

longshot · Post by **longshot** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 7:58 pm

What more do you want stillwater to do they play their 3rd and 4th line put in a 9th grade JV goalie who is now the back up varsity goalie in the 3rd because their varsity backup goalie is out as well. What else would you want them to do? score in their own net so the opponent has a score or how about they play keep away the rest of the game which is even IMO more humiliating and classless.

Melvin44 · Post by **Melvin44** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:20 pm

Settle down SW fans. I'm sure it hurt to get beat bad. Everyones entitled to their opinion and what they saw. I'm sure it was a combination of bad night, some girls hurt and probably payback from the earlier defeat.

Just a note. Stillwaters 1st line did score in the 3rd but it was her 1st goal of the night. And that's ok!

Some teams get beat 10-0 every night. When I coached I never wanted a team to let up. Either way. Life's tough somtimes. (I would tell my team to make at least 5 passes in the zone or something)

grlzhockeyrocks, I love your support for your team. Don't worry they'll be fine.

hockeywild7 · Post by **hockeywild7** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 8:59 pm

It has nothing to do with whether or not I am a fan of Stillwater. Yes, the 1st or 2nd line did score very early in the 3rd but never saw the ice again. So many positive things occur during games, I wish you would look at the other side like maybe they held back in a show of respect and sportsmanship to them. It is a hard position to be in either way you go as you look like you are disrespecting the other team if you keep playing hard or quit shooting. I watched the hand shakes after the game and the coaches looked to be getting along great after the game. I think we as fans play these things up bigger than the players and coaches do as they know what really is going on.

hockey121330 · Post by **hockey121330** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 9:24 pm

grlzhockeyrocks wrote: A little miffed that Stillwater kept playing their first line in the third period with a bench full of JV kids. Either it was revenge for their past poor performance or them looking to pad their big shots stats. Pretty classless. This one will be burned in the memories of future Hastings kids and will certainly be used as motivation for years to come.

grlzhockey and Keith Brooking (see Dallas Cowboys) should get together over a cup of coffee.

Melvin44 · Post by **Melvin44** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:03 pm

Like I said it's ok. 10-0 happens sometimes. WBL won 9-1 over MV and it didn't seem like they were running it up. Sometimes everything goes in.

capitalist · Post by **capitalist** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 10:43 pm

Disclaimer: I'm not a SW booster, don't live there or have a kid in the school or association. But I am a huge fan of TS and his program exactly because of his 'class' and his incredible coaching ability. (My daughter is fortunate enough to play for him in the off-season.) He's a great teacher--he teaches young kids more on the bench during a game or scrimmage than others do in a weeks worth of practices, and one lesson is always respect for the opponent.

If SW scored 6 goals in the second period, they could have scored more than that in the third, but didn't. They put in a freshman goalie for the 3rd, and they don't carry a benchful of kids who play both JV and V, maybe 2 or 3. Nobody likes running up the score, but that isn't the case here.

grlzhockeyrocks · Post by **grlzhockeyrocks** » Wed Jan 20, 2010 11:40 pm

[b][quote="hockeywild7. It has nothing to do with whether or not I am a fan of Stillwater. Yes, the 1st or 2nd line did score very early in the 3rd but never saw the ice again.

Really?! I am pretty sure Salmen, King, Cartony and Turri saw their regular shifts in the third, several people commented on it. Cartony scored the goal in the third and Turri seemed like she was on the ice every other shift.

Question, what shows up in the Prep Players of the week section in the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Turri's hat trick? Cartony's five points? or the fact that they may have been told to pass the puck five times before attempting to score? My point is that most of these girls have become more cognizant of seeing their names in the boxscores and trying to impress collegiate coaches with points at the cost of the integrity and sportsmanship of the game (by the way, I am not the only one who thinks this way, there is already a thread started about running up scores). Most, not all, will take advantage of any situation to pad stats. Heck, I've even seen upperclassman "steal" assists/goals from the younger girls because the ref asked the wrong person "who got the assist/goal"?

I am not knocking Stillwater, one of the best and cleanest teams in the state and I enjoy watching them. This is a lesson for Hastings who won't soon forget the motivational lashing they took. By the way, I would love to have a cup of coffee with Kieth Brookings and I wouldn't bet against the Cowboys the next time they play the Vikes either!!

hockeywild7 · Post by **hockeywild7** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 6:52 am

grlzhockeyrocks you are pretty sure? Well your wrong they did not play the whole third period. Get your facts right before you start naming names and making false accusations about players. Those players only played one shift, scored at the 3:00 mark (It was running time) and never stepped on the ice again. I was there I saw them score on that shift. The JV line started the 3rd period and played every other shift almost the entire period. Your ignorance about Stillwaters players is very clear and its obvious you have an axe to grind with them. The two players you mention are unselfish and total team players. And from what I hear have already committed to a college so they don't have to impress anyone with running up points as you say they do. The score could have been much worse has Stillwater wanted it to be.

OntheEdge · Post by **OntheEdge** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:16 am

I think that the "running up the score" complaint is overblown and more of a problem with fans. I think players should go hard all of the time. In most sports more injuries occur when players are taking it easy and not focused. The Canadians think that it is more of an insult if you stop trying to score because you are in essence saying, we feel sorry for you so we will take it easy. I think that when the score is lopsided a coach should give most of the playing time to his or her third and fourth line players but don't let up. Also, I think most girls need to practice shooting in game situations. I remember one coach in youth hockey telling his team that they could only shoot backhands and slapshots (not too many U12 players back then really knew how to shoot a slapshot) but to keep shooting. The losing team doesn't get better by chasing passes either. Finally, remember that the clock keeps running (if there is a 6 goal differential) after a score, icing, offsides or penalty. In other words, there are ways to slow the bleeding without playing pass the puck.

Melvin44 · Post by **Melvin44** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 9:55 am

hockeywild7 wrote: And from what I hear have already committed to a college so they don't have to impress anyone with running up points as you say they do. The score could have been much worse has Stillwater wanted it to be.

Where are they going? Great kids and players.

hockeywild7 · Post by **hockeywild7** » Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:04 am

Agreed Melvin they are great kids as most are that are involved in girls hockey in our state. Most sacrifice alot to play at the level they do and it shows in how equal the teams are getting. I wouldn't want to disclose where I hear they are going as I may be incorrect so I will wait until they make it known.