Question about the Tonka team
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Question about the Tonka team
I have yet to see a game played by Minnekonta..( i live in sw mn) .. But i have been looking at their scores and saw that their goalie gives up just a little over a goal a game.. Is he really talented (much like Mike Lee was for Roseau) or does a lot of it have to do with Tonka's great defense core that i've read/heard about? thanks for the info..
-
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Sun Nov 29, 2009 1:03 pm
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
Right. In my opinion, great defense and spotty goaltending can defend much better than great goaltending and spotty defense. SSP v. Tonka is a perfect example of this.EHSHack wrote:I would imagine it would be much like Duluth East last year with their 3 (if you count Welinski 4) D-1 defensemen. The D was so good they fed the offense which led to many more scoring chances.
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:15 pm
The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:53 pm
Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.Factsmatter1 wrote:The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
-
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 3:47 pm
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:15 pm
Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote:Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.Factsmatter1 wrote:The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
-
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Lakeville
Who do you think was the last team to be as good as Minnetonka? Are we going all the way back to Jefferson in the 90's? Just curious.Factsmatter1 wrote:Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote:Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.Factsmatter1 wrote:The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
It's not the Best players, it's the Right players! HB
-
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm
-
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 9:15 pm
Maybe the '93 Jefferson team for this reason...HappyHockeyFan wrote:Who do you think was the last team to be as good as Minnetonka? Are we going all the way back to Jefferson in the 90's? Just curious.Factsmatter1 wrote:Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote: Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
Quote:"The Jefferson teams were about the sum of the whole as their teams developed from squirts to their final high school game. It was the talent on their teams that was unmatched as they boasted 15 players from the '92 and '93 teams that went on to play at a higher level. They had it all talented forwards who could score, defensemen who could move the puck, and a goaltender that kept the puck out of the net in Randy Koeppel and Jeff Heil."
-
- Posts: 140
- Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 8:05 pm
I'm pretty sure that Jim Kruger, the goalie, transferred from hopkins sometime around his freshman year. But I'm almost positive that Holl, Gardiner, Prochno, and Hesketh all have grown up in the Tonka system.youngblood08 wrote:Does anyone know if all of these Tonka players grew-up in the Tonka system? Or have some joined in the last few years? I just don't remember them being this strong at the youth level when these kids were playing.
While I agree that Tonka is an outstanding and clearly the best team in Minnesota right now, let's have them win a state title, or at least get to a state tournament before we start talking them in comparison to the greatest teams in history. Jefferson won three straight titles in the early 90s, Burnsville and Hill-Murray each played in three title games in four years during the mid 80s, teams like Edina, Grand Rapids and Roseau have had stretches where they made numerous tournament appearances. When Minnetonka wins a title, they can be talked about in the same way as those teams.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
facts, I don't necessarily disagree with you, but Tonka isn't dominating all of their opponents. 3 of their wins against top 5 teams are by 1 goal and they have 8 wins by 3 or 4 goals. I would say a team as dominant as what you're saying would be winning by a little more.Factsmatter1 wrote:Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote:Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.Factsmatter1 wrote:The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
All that being said, doing what they have been doing without a full roster is crazy. We will see them play Edina and Wayzata each at least twice more. We'll see if the full roster helps them improve.
-
- Posts: 581
- Joined: Thu Jan 04, 2007 4:53 pm
Goalie, I'll give you. Defense was weaker but not by as much as you say. When all is said and done, they will probably have 3 defensemen from that team end up d1. Plus so far one and hopefully a couple more playing d3Factsmatter1 wrote:Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote:Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.Factsmatter1 wrote:The answer is Tonka has D-1 status or potential at all three roles: goalie, defense and forward which is what makes them so dangerous. Everyone in the state knows about the Defense and should know it about the goalie. The underclassmen forwards have been the best kept secret until lately... Their top line forwards are all underclass and didn't miss a beat after Gardiner got hurt.
Bottom line is this is a great team that comes along once every 10-15 years in MN with strength at every position. ...and this one seems to have come out of nowhere...
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
Anyway, the point I'm making is there is a "chosen" team every year and people generally get overexcited and try to crown em.
-
- Posts: 6480
- Joined: Tue Jul 17, 2007 9:03 pm
- Contact:
To some degree, this is true; people will latch on to the most talented team in a given year and declare them the closest thing we have to the '93 Jags, which in a simple sense I suppose is true. And this year's Tonka team has the potential to reach that level.scoreboard33 wrote: Anyway, the point I'm making is there is a "chosen" team every year and people generally get overexcited and try to crown em.
I'm not sure it's the greatest team over the past few years, and to a large degree that depends on what you think makes a great team. If it's talent alone, I think '07-08 Edina might give them a good run. Some of the Moorhead teams from the middle of the decade as well, perhaps.
Personally, though, I would say that truly "great" teams should win a state title.
Not only that, there's an argument that a truly great team will not have just one good year--the best year (93 Jefferson, 98 East) will simply be the crowning achievement in the midst of a dynasty. I think there's something to that position.
Last edited by karl(east) on Sat Jan 23, 2010 5:54 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6848
- Joined: Thu Aug 31, 2006 10:21 pm
scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote:Goalie, I'll give you. Defense was weaker but not by as much as you say. When all is said and done, they will probably have 3 defensemen from that team end up d1. Plus so far one and hopefully a couple more playing d3Factsmatter1 wrote:Scoreboard,scoreboard33 wrote: Really, a team like this comes around pretty much every year. Edina last year could have been on Tonka's level. Roseau 2 years ago was definately pretty close.
If Tonka runs the table and wins state, I'll give them credit for being the team you claim they are, if not.... you know.
We can agree to disagree but no way you are getting me to buy into the statement about Edina being the same level as Tonka. Their "D" was much weaker and there goal tending was spotty at best. No one would question their offensive capability. My only point above is that Tonka has top talent across the Board.
Anyway, the point I'm making is there is a "chosen" team every year and people generally get overexcited and try to crown em.
while what you say is true, this Tonka team seems to definitely be something special. Take the Roseau team from 3 years ago who won state with two losses and beating every team on their schedule; they only played 9 AA teams all season, including sections/state, many that were very mediocre.
While this Tonka team has played a couple sub-par opponents and had a few close games, their schedule has been very difficult (rated #3 by pagestat) and they are still winning. Last year, many were in love with Jefferson while they were winning, not even dominating, a Lake Conference schedule.
So, I do agree that every year a team comes around that everyone says is great, but I also believe this team is doing things similar teams of the past didn't.
Yes, other than Kruger they all came up through the youth system. Kruger wasn't going to get to play with Alex Fonz already in place at Hopkins. Similar situation on the girls side with Julie Friend coming to Minnetonka as a freshman and becoming starting goalie as she wasn't going to play at Hopkins with Billadeau already there.nikebauer05 wrote:I'm pretty sure that Jim Kruger, the goalie, transferred from hopkins sometime around his freshman year. But I'm almost positive that Holl, Gardiner, Prochno, and Hesketh all have grown up in the Tonka system.youngblood08 wrote:Does anyone know if all of these Tonka players grew-up in the Tonka system? Or have some joined in the last few years? I just don't remember them being this strong at the youth level when these kids were playing.
I disagree with the earlier suggestion that Kruger's goaltending has been spotty as there was a number of games against top 5 teams where he kept his team in the game and allowed them to win it.
-
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 10:16 am
Great point Gov!Gov78 wrote:Yes, other than Kruger they all came up through the youth system. Kruger wasn't going to get to play with Alex Fonz already in place at Hopkins. Similar situation on the girls side with Julie Friend coming to Minnetonka as a freshman and becoming starting goalie as she wasn't going to play at Hopkins with Billadeau already there.nikebauer05 wrote:I'm pretty sure that Jim Kruger, the goalie, transferred from hopkins sometime around his freshman year. But I'm almost positive that Holl, Gardiner, Prochno, and Hesketh all have grown up in the Tonka system.youngblood08 wrote:Does anyone know if all of these Tonka players grew-up in the Tonka system? Or have some joined in the last few years? I just don't remember them being this strong at the youth level when these kids were playing.
I disagree with the earlier suggestion that Kruger's goaltending has been spotty as there was a number of games against top 5 teams where he kept his team in the game and allowed them to win it.
Last time I checked the W column didn't include a stat for margin of victory, but this same team is about to take Edina to running time.HShockeywatcher wrote:facts, I don't necessarily disagree with you, but Tonka isn't dominating all of their opponents. 3 of their wins against top 5 teams are by 1 goal and they have 8 wins by 3 or 4 goals. I would say a team as dominant as what you're saying would be winning by a little more.
Tonka HS
All of these players grew up in the tonka hockey program except Krueger. He transferred over after his freshman season from Hopkins.
These senior kids never won a tournament in their youth hockey days. They never made it of the first round in the D6 playoffs. Edina, Chaska and EP got all the glory.
Now, it's their turn....
These senior kids never won a tournament in their youth hockey days. They never made it of the first round in the D6 playoffs. Edina, Chaska and EP got all the glory.
Now, it's their turn....
Play Like a Champion Today
-
- Posts: 1007
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 3:04 pm