The Saints where higher on the list for Los Angeles candidates. Now that part is taken care of being they have a stadium that holds a lot of folks!youngblood08 wrote:NFL wanted the Saints to win.
Who is next on the list for the move?

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Couldn't agree more. If the Vikings had gone after Brees and hit him like the Saints did to Favre, I guarantee the whole city of New Orleans would be up in arms complaining right now. Its obvious they were instructed to take Favre out of the game. If Brad Childress had a pair he would have told jared Allen to take Brees out after the first half.MNHockey75 wrote:Minus the 19 fumbles, the Vikings played outstanding. It's too bad because this was their only shot at a winner in my lifetime, and I'm only 22.
It almost seemed to be rigged just like the 2007 colts run, just look at this...
Peterson - 2 fumbles
Berrian - fumble lost
Favre - fumble lost, 2 ints
Harvin - fumble lost
Reynaud - fumble
![]()
You add the dreadful officiating late in the game to it all. The Leber pass interference call? What was with that? You need some contact for a penalty right? Guess not.
Was anyone else in an outrage over the low hit on Favre? After all the Carson Palmer and Tom Brady low blow talk and the refs just watch it with their hands down their pants. Yikes.
Actually the last one was 41-doughnut....30-27 set us up for it.hockeyfan893 wrote:I'd like to point out the last time we were in this situation.
Loss 30-27.
Now this year, loss 31-28.
What's going on!?
And no one is commenting on how the heck do you come out of a timeout with 12 guys in the huddle??? Who do you blame on that? Childress admitted in the post game conference that without that, they would have ran on third down, thus eliminating the chance to throw a pick. Wait...never mind, they probably would have fumbled again!MNHockey75 wrote:Minus the 19 fumbles, the Vikings played outstanding. It's too bad because this was their only shot at a winner in my lifetime, and I'm only 22.
It almost seemed to be rigged just like the 2007 colts run, just look at this...
Peterson - 2 fumbles
Berrian - fumble lost
Favre - fumble lost, 2 ints
Harvin - fumble lost
Reynaud - fumble
![]()
You add the dreadful officiating late in the game to it all. The Leber pass interference call? What was with that? You need some contact for a penalty right? Guess not.
Was anyone else in an outrage over the low hit on Favre? After all the Carson Palmer and Tom Brady low blow talk and the refs just watch it with their hands down their pants. Yikes.
Yep, they screwed up. Just like the officials screwed up on the fumble recovery for a touchdown that ended up on the 10 instead, and the touchdown for the saints that was crawled in. One call that was a maybe and I don't think anyone argues with it either way, one call that was as obvious as a Vikes fan in the Superdome. Ya, the Vikings blew it, you don't win with fumbles and interceptions...but the officals helped out, no denying it.Bigcat99 wrote:And no one is commenting on how the heck do you come out of a timeout with 12 guys in the huddle??? Who do you blame on that? Childress admitted in the post game conference that without that, they would have ran on third down, thus eliminating the chance to throw a pick. Wait...never mind, they probably would have fumbled again!MNHockey75 wrote:Minus the 19 fumbles, the Vikings played outstanding. It's too bad because this was their only shot at a winner in my lifetime, and I'm only 22.
It almost seemed to be rigged just like the 2007 colts run, just look at this...
Peterson - 2 fumbles
Berrian - fumble lost
Favre - fumble lost, 2 ints
Harvin - fumble lost
Reynaud - fumble
![]()
You add the dreadful officiating late in the game to it all. The Leber pass interference call? What was with that? You need some contact for a penalty right? Guess not.
Was anyone else in an outrage over the low hit on Favre? After all the Carson Palmer and Tom Brady low blow talk and the refs just watch it with their hands down their pants. Yikes.
STILL bitter about Tuesday nite, aren't ya ? (6-2, ouch !)salol44 wrote:I think you meant to say "Moorhead of the NFL"Goldfishdude wrote:karl(east) wrote:Particularly when the real, pagan Vikings were most famous for ransacking and pillaging British monasteries.
At any rate, Vikings = White Bear Lake of the NFL.![]()
![]()
I swear to.......... a stack of pancakes (that better?).... that I WAS going to put that in my post, Karl, but I have taken more than enough heat about my Bears, and I thought I better not!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
But since you let the cat out of the bag...........
The difference between the Vikes and the Bears???
I will never hate the Vikes.....
SPUDNUT wrote:STILL bitter about Tuesday nite, aren't ya ? (6-2, ouch !)salol44 wrote:I think you meant to say "Moorhead of the NFL"Goldfishdude wrote:![]()
![]()
I swear to.......... a stack of pancakes (that better?).... that I WAS going to put that in my post, Karl, but I have taken more than enough heat about my Bears, and I thought I better not!!!![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
But since you let the cat out of the bag...........
The difference between the Vikes and the Bears???
I will never hate the Vikes.....