Cloquet v. Forest Lake- 2-15-10

gamer19 · Post by **gamer19** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 4:18 pm

I see FL plays in Cloquet tonight. Predictions? Does this game have any section meaning or is the order pretty much set? I know GR, Princeton, Cambridge-Isanti, and Cloquet all have records fairly close, however GR beat Cloquet and plays a tough schedule. CI beat Cloquet and split with Princeton, Princeton just got smoked by Denfeld. 1-5 should be set if you think St. Francis is as real as there record. Fl should have the 4 seed locked, will they even show up?

wblhockeyfan8 · Post by **wblhockeyfan8** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 6:31 pm

Cloquet always looks exponentially better at the close of the season.

CEC-5 FLAKE-4 OT

BigWorm · Post by **BigWorm** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 9:43 pm

8-0 Flake, final.

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:34 pm

BigWorm wrote:8-0 Flake, final.

Geez.. I just saw this thread, and I would have guessed maybe a 4-0, 4-1 FLAKE win, but this is ridiculous. FLake is hitting a big stride, and this is the team I felt has the best chance to pull an upset in sections.

Post by **karl(east)** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 10:40 pm

I'm also surprised by this one; seems like a big step backwards for Cloquet after what they'd been doing in recent weeks. Though FTP has the shots at 41-38, so it seems the game was close in one aspect...can anyone who was in attendance comment?

Post by **karl(east)** » Mon Feb 15, 2010 11:20 pm

Answering some of my own questions via hockeyhub summary...

Shots were indeed 41-38 Cloquet. What caused the lopsided score? Penalties, probably--Cloquet took 10, 9 in the first two periods. Flake went 4 of 7 on the PP. That combined with their inconsistent goaltending made this one a laugher.

Hard to say which Cloquet team will show up on a given night. And Flake should be given some credit too; they're sailing into sections on a high note and could cause more than a few problems.

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:02 pm

karl(east) wrote:Answering some of my own questions via hockeyhub summary...

Shots were indeed 41-38 Cloquet. What caused the lopsided score? Penalties, probably--Cloquet took 10, 9 in the first two periods. Flake went 4 of 7 on the PP. That combined with their inconsistent goaltending made this one a laugher.

Hard to say which Cloquet team will show up on a given night. And Flake should be given some credit too; they're sailing into sections on a high note and could cause more than a few problems.

Needless to say my jaw dropped when I picked up a Pioneer Press this afternoon and saw it said Cloquet won 8-0.... I thought Hockeyhub made errors!!!!!

wbmd · Post by **wbmd** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 7:10 pm

Goldfishdude wrote:
karl(east) wrote:Answering some of my own questions via hockeyhub summary...

Shots were indeed 41-38 Cloquet. What caused the lopsided score? Penalties, probably--Cloquet took 10, 9 in the first two periods. Flake went 4 of 7 on the PP. That combined with their inconsistent goaltending made this one a laugher.

Hard to say which Cloquet team will show up on a given night. And Flake should be given some credit too; they're sailing into sections on a high note and could cause more than a few problems.
Needless to say my jaw dropped when I picked up a Pioneer Press this afternoon and saw it said Cloquet won 8-0.... I thought Hockeyhub made errors!!!!!

The Star Tribune had the same score. At least they had a box score that was correct.

Goldfishdude · Post by **Goldfishdude** » Tue Feb 16, 2010 8:51 pm

That Christian Gaffy may cause problems come sections. Not often you see 40+ save shutouts.