CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:32 pm
-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:27 pm
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.
-
- Posts: 366
- Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:32 pm
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Mark Alt also missed a portion of the season as well if you didn't know. His number would be much more impressive if that wasn't the case.slapstkhound wrote:Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.slapstkhound wrote:Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.

-
- Posts: 158
- Joined: Sat Feb 09, 2008 12:27 pm
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Point out to me where I said anything regarding the previous Woodbury game in this post. I merely pointed out that, IMHO, this game will be more than you are giving it credit for. As far as the previous section game, it was what...3 years ago. Time to move on from it. I know Alt was injured BUT if he's truly the monster defenseman that you believe, he should have more points. 15 points during the regular season in, I know you'll correct me, 11 games is not monster. Above average yes, monster no.smw1111 wrote:You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.slapstkhound wrote:Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
[
[/quote]Point out to me where I said anything regarding the previous Woodbury game in this post. I merely pointed out that, IMHO, this game will be more than you are giving it credit for. As far as the previous section game, it was what...3 years ago. Time to move on from it. I know Alt was injured BUT if he's truly the monster defenseman that you believe, he should have more points. 15 points during the regular season in, I know you'll correct me, 11 games is not monster. Above average yes, monster no.[/quote]
Classic stat hound....15 pts for a defenseman in 11 games on a defense first Hockey team (ahh....to protect the achilles heel).......besides lets remember their is ALWAYS more to a hockey players game than points......WHO has been regarded for several years as the best player on the Wild........Mikko who, and he has never been a super points guy. Defensemen are judged by plus/minus for the most part and amazingly......I think Alt was on the ice for ohh 6 goals last night by Cretin and 1 by Eastview.......+5......that is his job, keep scorers off his goalie, and help the offense score a couple here and there.......Mark does that job well, that is why the U wanted him since early in his sophmore campaign....ON a poor Cretin team

Classic stat hound....15 pts for a defenseman in 11 games on a defense first Hockey team (ahh....to protect the achilles heel).......besides lets remember their is ALWAYS more to a hockey players game than points......WHO has been regarded for several years as the best player on the Wild........Mikko who, and he has never been a super points guy. Defensemen are judged by plus/minus for the most part and amazingly......I think Alt was on the ice for ohh 6 goals last night by Cretin and 1 by Eastview.......+5......that is his job, keep scorers off his goalie, and help the offense score a couple here and there.......Mark does that job well, that is why the U wanted him since early in his sophmore campaign....ON a poor Cretin team
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: The Rick
Terrible argument all the way around. Mikko Koivu's worst season since 06 he had 42 points.. in an injury plagued 57 game season. But this is about high school and I'm sorry but pretty much all high school coaches preach defense first.. and if you want to be described as a monster you should stand out when your team is at state. Mark Alt did not do that last year.
Nice comment.......but not true, they placed 4th in the state last year. He played one excellent game, keep the HOUNDS down and shadowing people, and then against the spuds....he was +1 in a where he wasnt on the ice for either Spuds scores in a 2-1 game......I would say that was solid game too.nipeshow18 wrote:Terrible argument all the way around. Mikko Koivu's worst season since 06 he had 42 points.. in an injury plagued 57 game season. But this is about high school and I'm sorry but pretty much all high school coaches preach defense first.. and if you want to be described as a monster you should stand out when your team is at state. Mark Alt did not do that last year.
-
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Wed Feb 11, 2009 11:46 pm
- Location: U of M
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
hahaha This post has all the classic elements, blaming refs, calling other team overrated, calling other taems schedule suspect despite the fact that they beat your team. I'm guessing your a Green Bay Packer fan also?smw1111 wrote:You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.slapstkhound wrote:Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.
Last edited by DotaDangler on Fri Feb 26, 2010 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Imagine a world...with no Wisconsin
-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: The Rick
You keep saying that what we are saying is not true but it is. I never said that Mark Alt was not a solid hockey player. He certainly is. But he is not a stand out, "monster" like someone previously described him as. Get off his nuts already. This thread is about 3AA or whether or not we think CDH has a chance not you're passionate love for Mark Alt.
I like Eagan or Apple Valley to win this section. But then again I do not think any team is that much better than any of the other four remaining. Shoul be fun to watch!
I like Eagan or Apple Valley to win this section. But then again I do not think any team is that much better than any of the other four remaining. Shoul be fun to watch!
Wow....I think someone has a ball fetish and that person is like a baby sheep.....for nipeshow that would be U.......nipeshow18 wrote:You keep saying that what we are saying is not true but it is. I never said that Mark Alt was not a solid hockey player. He certainly is. But he is not a stand out, "monster" like someone previously described him as. Get off his nuts already. This thread is about 3AA or whether or not we think CDH has a chance not you're passionate love for Mark Alt.
I like Eagan or Apple Valley to win this section. But then again I do not think any team is that much better than any of the other four remaining. Shoul be fun to watch!
As for the best team......well last years AV-Cretin game was pretty awesome...and I would expect the same if they end up going again (which I think just might happen). Cretin would win though.......

-
- Posts: 169
- Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2008 6:35 pm
- Location: The Rick
You're an idiot. That is all.smw1111 wrote:Wow....I think someone has a ball fetish and that person is like a baby sheep.....for nipeshow that would be U.......nipeshow18 wrote:You keep saying that what we are saying is not true but it is. I never said that Mark Alt was not a solid hockey player. He certainly is. But he is not a stand out, "monster" like someone previously described him as. Get off his nuts already. This thread is about 3AA or whether or not we think CDH has a chance not you're passionate love for Mark Alt.
I like Eagan or Apple Valley to win this section. But then again I do not think any team is that much better than any of the other four remaining. Shoul be fun to watch!
As for the best team......well last years AV-Cretin game was pretty awesome...and I would expect the same if they end up going again (which I think just might happen). Cretin would win though.......You are right though about a tough section, it should of been AV third and Woodbury 4th......in the seeds. Woodbury really isnt a 3 seed......they have NO big wins. I would of enjoyed seeing two SEC-LAKE battles better than conference teams playing again.......ohh yeah have you seen Cretin play this year....because I have seen 4 Woodbury games, 5 Cretin games, 2 Eagan games and 2 AV games (not against each other either)......
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
well...the truth fits in Woodbury's case. Hockey should never decided by REFS.DotaDangler wrote:hahaha This post has all the classic elements, blaming refs, calling other team overrated, calling other taems schedule suspect despite the fact that they beat your team. I'm guessing your a Green Bay Packer fan also?smw1111 wrote:You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.slapstkhound wrote: Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
Well Cretin can't complain about last yr's region final ...when the refs gave a phantom hooking penalty behind Cretin's net in OT!! Horrible call ...power play goal..Cretin to state. So you might want to put that Woodbury game to bed from 3yrs ago...you were pd back.smw1111 wrote:well...the truth fits in Woodbury's case. Hockey should never decided by REFS.DotaDangler wrote:hahaha This post has all the classic elements, blaming refs, calling other team overrated, calling other taems schedule suspect despite the fact that they beat your team. I'm guessing your a Green Bay Packer fan also?smw1111 wrote: You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.
-
- Posts: 926
- Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 11:55 pm
- Location: Lakeville
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
HOOPS: Nice to hear from you again, you are the same guy that said Cretin would get clocked last year against The HOUNDS......how did that work out for ya.....As far as a phantom call against AV, The Eagles got a couple of phantom calls during the game that totally broke Cretin momentum.Hoops wrote:Well Cretin can't complain about last yr's region final ...when the refs gave a phantom hooking penalty behind Cretin's net in OT!! Horrible call ...power play goal..Cretin to state. So you might want to put that Woodbury game to bed from 3yrs ago...you were pd back.smw1111 wrote:well...the truth fits in Woodbury's case. Hockey should never decided by REFS.DotaDangler wrote: hahaha This post has all the classic elements, blaming refs, calling other team overrated, calling other taems schedule suspect despite the fact that they beat your team. I'm guessing your a Green Bay Packer fan also?
Hey....that is an opinion. I think Cretin beats AV in the Section Finals 4-1, Cretin-Woodbury will be a battle of styles.......if Woodbury can get to the net and shake the Cretin goalie.....hey they Royals just might win. If Alt and the boys keep the shots long and clean, Cretin in a WalkHappyHockeyFan wrote:I like Eagan to
win 3AA but any of the remaining 4 could win...Eagan 5 (en) Cretin 3 in the section final.
Last edited by smw1111 on Fri Feb 26, 2010 4:05 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
smw1111 wrote:HOOPS: Nice to hear from you again, you are the same guy that said Cretin would get clocked last year against The HOUNDS......how did that work out for ya.....As far as a phantom call against AV, The Eagles got a couple of phantom calls during the game that totally broke Cretin momentum.Hoops wrote:Well Cretin can't complain about last yr's region final ...when the refs gave a phantom hooking penalty behind Cretin's net in OT!! Horrible call ...power play goal..Cretin to state. So you might want to put that Woodbury game to bed from 3yrs ago...you were pd back.smw1111 wrote: well...the truth fits in Woodbury's case. Hockey should never decided by REFS.
What momemtum? Power play goal in Ot..the gift was received. Refs decided the game....just like you just said they shouldn't...or is it only when it goes against you?
-
- Posts: 159
- Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:33 pm
- Location: Woodbury
Re: CDH does anyone think they have a chance
smw1111 wrote:smw1111, this is a real laugher. You had to wait 3 years later to Bash Woodbury on a thread that didnt really pertain to them. You must have been on the team with Hickey, Mc Dougnah, Borer, and House. They were sent packing in the section final, because they were outplayed that night. I suppose the Refs gave Woodbury the next 5 games in a row that Cretin couldn't win either against Woodbury. They finally pulled a win off three years later and now its Payback? thats a real laugher. I never thought i would hear that coming from a Fan of the Mighty Cretin. I see your point though. Woodbury was horrible that year. so horrible that they beatThe mighty Hill Murray and gave Edina a scare in the Concolation championship. I didn't hear Hill Murray say that they got cheated that night they lost. By the way, The guy you can thank is attending St. Cloud St, and is vieing for Freshman of the year for the WCHA this year. Write David Eddy a letter and tell him your problems with that game. Im sure he will get just as good a laugh at your expence. Get over it, it might happen again.slapstkhound wrote:Pummeling???The score was 9-4 but tied 4-4 going into the 3rd which doesn't really say too much for Cretin's goalie against a 5-20 team. As far as Mark Alt, monster defenseman???, with 15 points??? He's slightly above average at very best and has been blessed with some really great PR, IMHO. I think the Cretin/Woodbury rematch will be more than you think.. We'll see but in the end the Achille's heel of Cretin will be their goaltending and how they work around it.smw1111 wrote:Mark Alt look very impressive and so did the rest of the Cretin team in pummeling Eastview. The only thing keeping Eastview in the game was that the Cretin goalie was very suspect. The rest of the team was great. I think this team is just hitting their stride now. Most of the players on this team have only played in about half of their games, including their monster defensemen headed by Mark Alt, I believe they are very strong and gonna be trouble for team from now till the X.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You must be a man......that doesnt even look at stats even....Alt had 15 pts before last night in ohh.....11 games, and he was injured for most of the games he still played in. I totally agree Cretin's goalie isnt top-flight, but the offensive firepower was great. I was there and there was no doubt which team was dominate.....3 of the Eastview goals were as soft as a down pillow. Cretin pounded on the Eastview goalie, and he became so gunshy that he even DUCKED when a slapper came from the point at him....luck it clanged off the POST. As for Woodbury, good luck, they will need it...they are OVER-RATED for even a third seed. Lets just say that Cretin dominated this game like they did a 3 or 4 years ago in a section title game (but the game was taken from them by the guys in black stripped shirts...and given to WOODBURY, that was a HUGE joke of a game 38 minutes of penalties on the Raiders to 4 for Woodbury, and they went to OT with Woodbury scoring on an offsides, along with another goal to tie earlier that was offsides too)......anything can and might happen in Minnesota HS hockey....but like in football, Cretin usually gets even...and they still havent exacted enough blood for that section final. Also, who did woodbury beat this year anyways they beat Cretin, and Cretin was play short on defensemen........IMPRESSIVE win 3-2 and Cretin didnt play with their top 4 defensemen.....The next best game they played was a 7-5 loss to the Whyzeta.........Do you want to talk some more. Cretin has played shorthanded (espcially on D) all year...and still shared the conference title. The Royals could win, it can happen....but it most likely wont. I have only seen Eagan twice this year once against EP and the other was Burnsville........so not quite sure on them.
On any given night!