SSM

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

O-townClown
Posts: 4422
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 12:22 pm
Location: Typical homeboy from the O-Town

uhhhhhh.... no

Post by O-townClown »

StillAnEagle wrote: Any of the top 5 MN AA teams would beat SSM. No question. Tonka, when they were hitting their stride early in the year, would have thumped stattuck.
No.

And it isn't a comparison that makes much sense either. It'd be like comparing Honeybaked to the kids that began their mini mite program at the rink that hosts Little Caesars.

Shattuck isn't a traditional Minnesota high school, so they don't play like one.
Be kind. Rewind.
pizzapizza
Posts: 3
Joined: Wed Jan 13, 2010 9:31 pm

Post by pizzapizza »

Shattuck has huge advantages over other AAA and Minnesota Association teams: the ability to recruit top players (I should rephrase: the ability to provide financial aid to top players), automatic invite to natys, 24/7 practice ice, and variety of other bennies.

How are they in a bad cycle? To lose across all age levels is like throwing 3 air balls in a row at the free throw line. How'd they do last year?
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher »

pizzapizza wrote:Shattuck has huge advantages over other AAA and Minnesota Association teams: the ability to recruit top players (I should rephrase: the ability to provide financial aid to top players), automatic invite to natys, 24/7 practice ice, and variety of other bennies.

How are they in a bad cycle? To lose across all age levels is like throwing 3 air balls in a row at the free throw line. How'd they do last year?
Good comparison :roll:

Getting to the semi-finals at nationals isn't exactly an "air ball"
The U invented swagger.
hockeyusa
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 9:16 pm

bantam A and ssm

Post by hockeyusa »

I agree tnat SSM have great players, but when they are beating teams 22 -0 , it is easy to rack up individual points. Having a stacked team , is no comparisson to association hockey.
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Re: bantam A and ssm

Post by Goldy Gopher »

hockeyusa wrote:I agree tnat SSM have great players, but when they are beating teams 22 -0 , it is easy to rack up individual points. Having a stacked team , is no comparisson to association hockey.
Small Falls anyone?
The U invented swagger.
The51
Posts: 402
Joined: Fri Oct 31, 2008 12:48 am

Re: uhhhhhh.... no

Post by The51 »

O-townClown wrote:
StillAnEagle wrote: Any of the top 5 MN AA teams would beat SSM. No question. Tonka, when they were hitting their stride early in the year, would have thumped stattuck.
No.

And it isn't a comparison that makes much sense either. It'd be like comparing Honeybaked to the kids that began their mini mite program at the rink that hosts Little Caesars.

Shattuck isn't a traditional Minnesota high school, so they don't play like one.
not only would they not beat shattuck they wouldnt beat the top 20 midget aaa teams
Post Reply