Spring Lake Park

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Spring Lake Park

Post by MrBoDangles »

They have some great talent........ Is this the year in sections?
Tony Soprano
Posts: 117
Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2008 5:18 pm

Post by Tony Soprano »

Who will take over in nets? That would be a big question in my mind.
my2cents
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:54 am

slp

Post by my2cents »

The term "great" is used rather loosely here, but they are definitely improved and I think that the new goalie will do just fine. They will be a top challenger in their section. They'll also continue to rack up the inflated stats with some of the lower competition they'll face.
DubCHAGuy
Posts: 404
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:44 am

Post by DubCHAGuy »

Saw them once last year, they do have some talent. With SSP and Mahto losing most of their top guys SLP could be #2 in the section, but I don't think they are anywhere near STA, especially by playoff time given the schedules to 2 teams play throughout the year
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: slp

Post by MrBoDangles »

my2cents wrote:The term "great" is used rather loosely here, but they are definitely improved and I think that the new goalie will do just fine. They will be a top challenger in their section. They'll also continue to rack up the inflated stats with some of the lower competition they'll face.
They have at least three players in the ELITE league. Is elite a level less than great for comparing Minnesota high school hockey players? I'm also curious if elite is loose in describing these players?
Nobodyonya
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:03 am

Re: slp

Post by Nobodyonya »

MrBoDangles wrote:
my2cents wrote:The term "great" is used rather loosely here, but they are definitely improved and I think that the new goalie will do just fine. They will be a top challenger in their section. They'll also continue to rack up the inflated stats with some of the lower competition they'll face.
They have at least three players in the ELITE league. Is elite a level less than great for comparing Minnesota high school hockey players? I'm also curious if elite is loose in describing these players?[/quote

ELITE- "Best of anything", "displays class" - yes you can use this word loosely, but when protraying players as "Elite" basically they need to project the meaning of the word not just partially, so if SLP has 3 players in the ELITE league are they actually ELITE? You can start another thread on this topic as it can be used in so many ways. My opinion in this and has no negativity within these players is No they are not Elite
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: slp

Post by MrBoDangles »

Nobodyonya wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote:
my2cents wrote:The term "great" is used rather loosely here, but they are definitely improved and I think that the new goalie will do just fine. They will be a top challenger in their section. They'll also continue to rack up the inflated stats with some of the lower competition they'll face.
They have at least three players in the ELITE league. Is elite a level less than great for comparing Minnesota high school hockey players? I'm also curious if elite is loose in describing these players?[/quote

ELITE- "Best of anything", "displays class" - yes you can use this word loosely, but when protraying players as "Elite" basically they need to project the meaning of the word not just partially, so if SLP has 3 players in the ELITE league are they actually ELITE? You can start another thread on this topic as it can be used in so many ways. My opinion in this and has no negativity within these players is No they are not Elite
So the "BEST" Minnesota players did not make the Elite League???? :idea:
Nobodyonya
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:03 am

Re: slp

Post by Nobodyonya »

MrBoDangles wrote:
Nobodyonya wrote:
MrBoDangles wrote: They have at least three players in the ELITE league. Is elite a level less than great for comparing Minnesota high school hockey players? I'm also curious if elite is loose in describing these players?[/quote

ELITE- "Best of anything", "displays class" - yes you can use this word loosely, but when protraying players as "Elite" basically they need to project the meaning of the word not just partially, so if SLP has 3 players in the ELITE league are they actually ELITE? You can start another thread on this topic as it can be used in so many ways. My opinion in this and has no negativity within these players is No they are not Elite
So the "BEST" Minnesota players did not make the Elite League???? :idea:
Quite frankly, this is a debateable issue pertaining to the ELITE league, tryouts, coaching positions etc. Obviously, there are going to be politics played in every event that a player participates in. So the "BEST" are not always playing in the ELITE league. :|
my2cents
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed May 31, 2006 9:54 am

defining "great"

Post by my2cents »

First of all, a team of "great" talent could mean a group of zero Elite Players but excellent depth of all very good players. It could also mean a few studs mixed in with average to good players.

In SLP's case, all three "Elite" players were placed and did not go through the tryout process. After witnessing the Elite tryouts myself, I would offer two opinions:

1) The Elite selections are NOT the very best players, nor is that expected. Many in the Elite league are underclassmen that are not yet as good as seniors that are not in the Elite league.

2) Two of the three Elite SLP players would have been burried and passed over in the tryouts. One player (I think "mrbodangles" himself) I'd consider on the bubble.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Re: defining "great"

Post by MrBoDangles »

my2cents wrote:First of all, a team of "great" talent could mean a group of zero Elite Players but excellent depth of all very good players. It could also mean a few studs mixed in with average to good players.

In SLP's case, all three "Elite" players were placed and did not go through the tryout process. After witnessing the Elite tryouts myself, I would offer two opinions:

1) The Elite selections are NOT the very best players, nor is that expected. Many in the Elite league are underclassmen that are not yet as good as seniors that are not in the Elite league.

2) Two of the three Elite SLP players would have been burried and passed over in the tryouts. One player (I think "mrbodangles" himself) I'd consider on the bubble.
I'm far removed from HS :wink:

I get where you're coming from..... If it's true it's not right.

Caught my eye at the game that there were three from SLP....... Impressed me that day.
MrBoDangles
Posts: 4090
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm

Post by MrBoDangles »

M2C, This would be a good chance for you to name the kids that got passed up and who they're better than............. Give them some glory ya know.
Nobodyonya
Posts: 283
Joined: Mon Dec 17, 2007 10:03 am

Post by Nobodyonya »

MrBoDangles wrote:M2C, This would be a good chance for you to name the kids that got passed up and who they're better than............. Give them some glory ya know.
I apologize for not remembering the players name, but he was from Champlin should of made the "Elite" team ahead of these 3 players
Post Reply