Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:42 pm
Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.
Picks?
http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... 9_2010.xls
Peewee A
November 26-28, 2010
Pool A
Mankato
Shakopee
Luverne
Forest Lake
Pool B
New Ulm
Rochester Gold
Sioux Falls Blue
Kansas City Stars
http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... 9_2010.xls
Peewee A
November 26-28, 2010
Pool A
Mankato
Shakopee
Luverne
Forest Lake
Pool B
New Ulm
Rochester Gold
Sioux Falls Blue
Kansas City Stars
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.roundhead wrote:Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Just to keep the peace...
Edited for realistic correction purposes:forreal wrote:Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.roundhead wrote:Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls
My bad. These things always look different on paper.
Re: Just to keep the peace...
I figured it was a typo.roundhead wrote:Edited for realistic correction purposes:forreal wrote:Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.roundhead wrote: Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls
My bad. These things always look different on paper.
KC was easily the better of the teams. It would be interesting to see what the other teams would have looked like after 25 games under their belt?
It is funny how people can never accept the way things played out on the ice and have to degrade anyone that finished above them. You take the way the pools were divided up and deal with it.
I would be interested to find out what you are basing the goones statement and minimal talent on. Sounds like sour grapes to me.
It is funny how people can never accept the way things played out on the ice and have to degrade anyone that finished above them. You take the way the pools were divided up and deal with it.
I would be interested to find out what you are basing the goones statement and minimal talent on. Sounds like sour grapes to me.