Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.

Discussion of Minnesota Youth Hockey

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

Post Reply
fastncrash
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Jul 20, 2009 9:42 pm

Mankato Thanksgiving Tourney.

Post by fastncrash »

Picks?

http://assets.ngin.com/attachments/docu ... 9_2010.xls


Peewee A

November 26-28, 2010

Pool A
Mankato
Shakopee
Luverne
Forest Lake

Pool B
New Ulm
Rochester Gold
Sioux Falls Blue
Kansas City Stars
Master Recruiter
Posts: 213
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 4:23 pm
Location: St Paul

Post by Master Recruiter »

Luverne rolls.
roundhead
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:57 pm

Results

Post by roundhead »

I think it ended up something like this.

K.C. Stars
Shakopee
Sioux Falls
Forest Lake
Mankato
Rochester
Luverne
New Ulm
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

Souix Falls I mean.
roundhead
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:57 pm

Post by roundhead »

old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
forreal
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:48 pm

Post by forreal »

roundhead wrote:
old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
roundhead
Posts: 107
Joined: Fri Jul 09, 2010 1:57 pm

Just to keep the peace...

Post by roundhead »

forreal wrote:
roundhead wrote:
old goalie85 wrote:No 3rd place game. Forest Lake never got to plat S.S.
Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Edited for realistic correction purposes:
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls

My bad. These things always look different on paper.
forreal
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2010 3:48 pm

Re: Just to keep the peace...

Post by forreal »

roundhead wrote:
forreal wrote:
roundhead wrote: Yeah, no concy game... that was weird. I just based it on record and goal differential.
Lets be serious Roundguy. Your team beat no one. Look at the crossover games and look at what Mankato and Luverne did to the team you beat.

There were some impressive teams in the tournament but I don't think your team is in that ball park. All I saw were a bunch of goons with very minimal skill. realistically Souix Falls would be the 6th best team in this tournament.
Edited for realistic correction purposes:
Mankato
Luverne
Kansas City
Shakopee
Forest Lake
Rochester
New Ulm
Sioux Falls

My bad. These things always look different on paper.
I figured it was a typo.
ALSANITI
Posts: 27
Joined: Mon May 03, 2010 10:32 am

Post by ALSANITI »

KC was easily the better of the teams. It would be interesting to see what the other teams would have looked like after 25 games under their belt?

It is funny how people can never accept the way things played out on the ice and have to degrade anyone that finished above them. You take the way the pools were divided up and deal with it.

I would be interested to find out what you are basing the goones statement and minimal talent on. Sounds like sour grapes to me.
Post Reply