Howie wrote:HShockeywatcher wrote:crickett75 wrote:
St. Thomas is a great school, I think most everyone agrees with that. If you're a good hockey player and you're presented the opportunity to go there and play for great coaches why wouldn't you? I'd leave any public school within 10 miles of the place to go there. So St. Thomas has this pool of applicants, to choose from. Of course St. Thomas has a huge advantage over similar "sized" schools, who are limited by attendance boundaries and have to accept everyone. Like Goldy said, the economic disparity alone gives privates a huge advantage.
You're looking for respect for your school. You want to disallow others from opting up to give legitimacy for St. Thomas playing Class A.
Good luck with both.
Ha, this has nothing to do with a specific school, but nice try.
Sure, if a school that could only accept 200 freshman got 500 applicants, those who previously participated in extracurricuars
may be toward the top of the list. But that isn't the case. Did you read the article? One of the reasons Totino hasn't opted up is declining enrollment...an economics thing.
Private schools are a business, period. I don't know what goes into the selection process, but I know you need athletes at your school to attract others. I was simply responding to the "hand picking" comment, which is far from the truth.
As for the specific example, if you'd read my posts in this thread you'd know I could care less what class St Thomas is specifically in.
How a school playing in the class they were assigned is not legitimate I do not know.
Private schools are a business as you say, which is what some of us have been trying to convey for a long time. Since it is a business, they either belong at the top level 'AA" or like the shattuck "business" not with the public non-corporate entities.
Nobody is disputing the fact that St. Thomas is assigned to the smaller school "A" class, what most of us longtime fans want to know is why?? So far the answers have been lots of fluff, spin, and utter non-sense from those trying to justify it.
Just because private schools are businesses does not mean that their athletes and teams have to be treated as professionals. Professional leagues are the ones that switch up placement as a result of success. High school leagues are in place to encourage participation. It is the school, not the team, that is a business. It doesn't make sense to punish all private schools for the perceived crimes of one (and I say "one" here, and not St. Thomas, because it does not seem to matter which one. Whichever team is currently successful in Class A is apparently the guiltiest). Look at the track records of teams. Duluth Marshall was, for a time, completely dominant in the north. Did they expect to see a drop in their success? Probably not. Let us not forget that St. Thomas used to be
bad. It would have been difficult for them to foresee exactly the quality of their success. What's more, they haven't even gone to the tournament for the last two years. The only team with a relentlessly consistent track record of quality is Hill, and they have already opted up. If it is "fluff, spin, and utter non-sense" that St. Thomas should benefit from doing what they are told, then you should get in touch with the policymakers. It is difficult for us, as posters on an online forum, to presume to know what is best for an institution in this year or years to come. Their choice not to opt up could reflect the belief that their success will not last, after all. There is no way to know.
Also, as far as "rewarding middling hockey with television" being "ludicrous" goes, you should consider writing a pleasant (or unpleasant, considering your tone on the board) note to FSN about why they should drop the Gophers. Seriously, if it offends you so badly, just don't turn it on. Don't begrudge a team of HS athletes part of a prize that they rightfully earned.