Who makes it out of D8 PWA playoffs?
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Who makes it out of D8 PWA playoffs?
Seeds are as follows. 3 Teams Advance with the 4 place team playing the D9 4 place for extra spot in regions.
1. Farmington
2. Rosemount
3. Woodbury
4. Lakeville South
5. Lakeville North
6. Eastview
7. Sibley
8. Hastings
9. Inver Grove/ SSP
10. Eagan
1. Farmington
2. Rosemount
3. Woodbury
4. Lakeville South
5. Lakeville North
6. Eastview
7. Sibley
8. Hastings
9. Inver Grove/ SSP
10. Eagan
Last edited by hocman on Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:16 pm
Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.Night Train wrote:Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
The question should be directed to D9, which also has 3 berth in south regional and a potential 4th with a play-in game vs. D8#4. D9 best team ranks around 38 in the state!hocman wrote:D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.Night Train wrote:Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
Last edited by Mnhockeys on Wed Feb 16, 2011 4:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You mean D9's best team ranks 38th in the state.Mnhockeys wrote:The question should be directed to D9, which also has 3 berth in south regional and a potential 4th with a play-in game vs. D8 #4. D8 best team ranks around 38 in the state!hocman wrote:D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.Night Train wrote:Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
Yes, fixed!hocman wrote:You mean D9's best team ranks 38th in the state.Mnhockeys wrote:The question should be directed to D9, which also has 3 berth in south regional and a potential 4th with a play-in game vs. D8 #4. D8 best team ranks around 38 in the state!hocman wrote: D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:36 am
I presume that they had to keep the extra berth in the South Regional, which just happens to be the weakest this year. It rotates so its hard to protest too much. Tough when there's 8 regional spots for 3 districts... one always gets 2 and there's on way to rotate the regionals without two weak districts occasionally getting in one regional.hocman wrote:D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.Night Train wrote:Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
D3 may not have the top end teams that D6 has, but I think its a stretch to say that there's a fall off after Wayzata and OMG. Mpls Park, Crow River and Armstrong will all compete for the final spot. Mpls Park beat OMG and has tied Wayzata, while Crow River went 1-1 with Mpls Park and Armstrong just tied Mpls Park or OMG I believe and lost to Wayzata by a goal.
-
- Posts: 350
- Joined: Tue Jun 12, 2007 1:16 pm
D6 has 3 berths this year and D3 has 2.
When District 1 was alive they offered their 3rd berth to the District with only 2 berths by having a play in game between the 3rd place teams for District 1s 3rd berth. All I suggested is shouldn't the play in game be with a District with only 2 berths (District 3 this year) as opposed to a District, and potentially a weaker one, that already has 3 berths.
When District 1 was alive they offered their 3rd berth to the District with only 2 berths by having a play in game between the 3rd place teams for District 1s 3rd berth. All I suggested is shouldn't the play in game be with a District with only 2 berths (District 3 this year) as opposed to a District, and potentially a weaker one, that already has 3 berths.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:36 am
In theory probably. D8 is with D9 and D4 this year. D8 got 3 seeds, D4 three seeds, and D4 2 seeds, BUT D4 has 3 teams and gave one of its seeds to D9 and D8, to be determined by a playoff game.Night Train wrote:D6 has 3 berths this year and D3 has 2.
When District 1 was alive they offered their 3rd berth to the District with only 2 berths by having a play in game between the 3rd place teams for District 1s 3rd berth. All I suggested is shouldn't the play in game be with a District with only 2 berths (District 3 this year) as opposed to a District, and potentially a weaker one, that already has 3 berths.
I am guessing that you can't have a South regional district give its seed to a non-South regional district, such as D3.
D8 Teams
Everyone wanted District 1 out so there teams could get more playoff spots, All I can say is you were not careful what you asked for. I am very happy that the only association that had the guts and went to District 8 is Johnsonson/Como. Yes their "A" Pee Wee team was last but District 8 has 5 teams in the top 25 and talking to the people at Johnson/Como yes they took their lumps but they got better all year. Again all you people that thought you were beating the system I feel sorry for you that you didn't want to keep district 1 around now fight 4 teams from District 8. So now you have two districts to fight 6 and 8. I hope you are all proud.
They could do that...3 years ago D1 gave its 3rd spot to a play-in game that was won by Roseville. And there were no other D2 teams in the bracket. I am surprised there isn't a rule in the Minnesota Hockey hand book.Concerned Hockey Coach wrote:In theory probably. D8 is with D9 and D4 this year. D8 got 3 seeds, D4 three seeds, and D4 2 seeds, BUT D4 has 3 teams and gave one of its seeds to D9 and D8, to be determined by a playoff game.Night Train wrote:D6 has 3 berths this year and D3 has 2.
When District 1 was alive they offered their 3rd berth to the District with only 2 berths by having a play in game between the 3rd place teams for District 1s 3rd berth. All I suggested is shouldn't the play in game be with a District with only 2 berths (District 3 this year) as opposed to a District, and potentially a weaker one, that already has 3 berths.
I am guessing that you can't have a South regional district give its seed to a non-South regional district, such as D3.
It's unique and it gives teams in the district hope. Farmington and Rosemount could easily compete with 1997 AAA teams at the national level. Woodbury is so close to those 2 that it almost seems unfair. Against my team, they were the best. There can be upsets...but those 3 are locks...now Lakeville N, Lakeville S, Eastview have to feel pretty good about extending their seasons. It makes for good fun. My pick is the 11 seed Apple Valley.
My picks for the games are:
Playin games
IGH/SSP over Sibley
Lakeville North over Como
Eagan over Sibley
Apple Valley over Eastview
Round 2
Farmington over IGH/SSP
Lakeville South over Lakeville North
Rosemount over Eagan
Woodbury over Apple Valley
round 3
Farmington over Lakeville South
Woodbury over Rosemount
IGH/SSP over Lakeville North
Apple Valley over Eagan
round 4/5
Farmington over Rosemount and wins the Distr tourney
Woodbury over IGH/SSP
Apple Valley over Lakeville South
Woodbury over Apple Valley
1. Farmington
2. Rosemount
3. Woodbury
4. Apple Valley
Here's the link to the bracket:
http://www.stickstats.com/district8/lea ... aplay.html
Apple Valley?
If AppleValley beats Eastview there should be an investigation. Apple Valley lost 10 in a row after playing Johnson/Como and finally got beat by last place Eagan to put Johnson/Como from 10th to to last, A district 8 setup so Eagan did't have to play Lakeville North. Go district 10!!!!!!!
Re: Apple Valley?
palms, i knew you were from Como. The only problem with your theory is that Eastview and Apple Valley were in D6 last season. Though, an all-Apple Valley matchup makes for interesting hockey. The banter at the Junior High should be fun for the kids. A nice little rivalry that should play itself out over the next few years.iseepalms wrote:If AppleValley beats Eastview there should be an investigation. Apple Valley lost 10 in a row after playing Johnson/Como and finally got beat by last place Eagan to put Johnson/Como from 10th to to last, A district 8 setup so Eagan did't have to play Lakeville North. Go district 10!!!!!!!
-
- Posts: 369
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 8:17 am
Re: Apple Valley?
What?iseepalms wrote:If AppleValley beats Eastview there should be an investigation. Apple Valley lost 10 in a row after playing Johnson/Como and finally got beat by last place Eagan to put Johnson/Como from 10th to to last, A district 8 setup so Eagan did't have to play Lakeville North. Go district 10!!!!!!!

District eight
Ctbrow1, You got me I was from Como but my son now plays in Irondale.
If you look on MN Rankings you will see Apple Valley has lost like 10 games in a row. Look for Rosemount, Farmington, Woodbury and Lakeville South (If not Lakeville North)to come out of district 8.
If you look on MN Rankings you will see Apple Valley has lost like 10 games in a row. Look for Rosemount, Farmington, Woodbury and Lakeville South (If not Lakeville North)to come out of district 8.
-
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:43 pm
This is interesting so I thought I would look into D3 performance from their Entire Year statistics versus the Last 15 games. I used MYHOCKEYRANKINGS data for this comparison:Concerned Hockey Coach wrote:I presume that they had to keep the extra berth in the South Regional, which just happens to be the weakest this year. It rotates so its hard to protest too much. Tough when there's 8 regional spots for 3 districts... one always gets 2 and there's on way to rotate the regionals without two weak districts occasionally getting in one regional.hocman wrote:D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.Night Train wrote:Doesn't the 3rd berth from a weak District usually go to a strong District with only 2 spots this year? Why would District 8 get a 4th berth before District 3 gets 3? Sounds like there should be a playoff between the 3rd place finisher from District 9 with the 3rd place finisher from District 3. What other Districts only have 2 berths this year?
D3 may not have the top end teams that D6 has, but I think its a stretch to say that there's a fall off after Wayzata and OMG. Mpls Park, Crow River and Armstrong will all compete for the final spot. Mpls Park beat OMG and has tied Wayzata, while Crow River went 1-1 with Mpls Park and Armstrong just tied Mpls Park or OMG I believe and lost to Wayzata by a goal.
#1 Seed: Wayzata - Season: 17.13/Last15: 16.18 = -.95 trend in performance
#2 Seed: OMG - Season: 14.80/Last15: 15.42 = .62 trend
#3 Seed: MPLS - Season: 13.41/Last15: 13.30 = -.11 trend
#4 Seed: Armstrong - Season: 13.22/Last15: 14.21 = .99 trend
#5 Seed: CrowRvr - Season: 13.04/Last15: 12.98 = -.06 trend
#6 Seed: Orono - Season: 11.53/Last15: 11.12 = -.41 trend
#7 Seed: Mound - Season: 10.58/Last 15: 10.05 = -.53 trend
#8 Seed Hopkins - Season: 10.34/Last 15: 10.96 = .62 trend
#9 Seed SLP - Season: 8.60/Last 15: 8.08 = -.52 trend
The data would indicate that Armstrong has made the most improvement followed by OMG and Hopkins. Wayzata is the best team in D3 even with their drop in measured performance of almost 1 point.
The Last 15 games would rank the teams as follows:
1. Wayzata 16.18
2. OMG 15.42
3. Armstrong 14.21
4. MPLS 13.30
5. Crow Rvr 12.98
6. Orono 11.12
7. Hopkins 10.96
8. Mound 10.05
9. SLP 8.08
If you looked at recent performance this sort would tell us that Mound should be playing in the Play In Game vs SLP instead of Hopkins.
As the teams enter into district tournament play there will be variables in play that probably did not exist (for most teams) in the regular season. Specifically, you will see the top goalies on the team getting more game time as well as the top players getting more ice time so simple logic would say that their is a chance the top teams will increase their output when their top players get more ice time.
I do not have the data done yet for the other districts so it may not be fair to say but on the surface it would look like D3 did not develop its teams at a rate they would like to have happen. My rationale for that statement is that only 3 teams have shown a positive trend in the Last 15 games (Armstrong, OMG and Hopkins) and everyone else went negative but Crow River was pretty close to being flat so I will say 3 up, 1 even and 5 down.
As for the comment of D3 dropping off big, I would conclude that the drop off is not as dramatic the phrase "drop off big time" would indicate when you look at the Last 15 game scores and compare them to the Season Rankings for all of the teams - 4 out of the 9 are in the top 30:
Wayzata would be 8
OMG 11
Armstrong 20
MPLS 28
CrowRvr 34
Orono 56
Hopkins 58
Mound 68
SLP 81
Best of luck to all the teams in districts!
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:36 am
Interesting take... doesn't the strength of schedule influence trends though? Are you sure you're not punishing a team for who they have played? That is my largest beef with myhockeyrankings, I don't buy the "you should have beaten a team by 3/4 goals" since not all teams are structured or play to win by the level that myhockey says you should.mnhockeyperson wrote:This is interesting so I thought I would look into D3 performance from their Entire Year statistics versus the Last 15 games. I used MYHOCKEYRANKINGS data for this comparison:Concerned Hockey Coach wrote:I presume that they had to keep the extra berth in the South Regional, which just happens to be the weakest this year. It rotates so its hard to protest too much. Tough when there's 8 regional spots for 3 districts... one always gets 2 and there's on way to rotate the regionals without two weak districts occasionally getting in one regional.hocman wrote: D3 is not strong after Wayzata and OMG it falls off big. I think you meant to say D6 now that is a buzz saw, Edina, EP, Prior Lake, Burnsville and Tonka but they might get 3 berths as well not sure.
D3 may not have the top end teams that D6 has, but I think its a stretch to say that there's a fall off after Wayzata and OMG. Mpls Park, Crow River and Armstrong will all compete for the final spot. Mpls Park beat OMG and has tied Wayzata, while Crow River went 1-1 with Mpls Park and Armstrong just tied Mpls Park or OMG I believe and lost to Wayzata by a goal.
#1 Seed: Wayzata - Season: 17.13/Last15: 16.18 = -.95 trend in performance
#2 Seed: OMG - Season: 14.80/Last15: 15.42 = .62 trend
#3 Seed: MPLS - Season: 13.41/Last15: 13.30 = -.11 trend
#4 Seed: Armstrong - Season: 13.22/Last15: 14.21 = .99 trend
#5 Seed: CrowRvr - Season: 13.04/Last15: 12.98 = -.06 trend
#6 Seed: Orono - Season: 11.53/Last15: 11.12 = -.41 trend
#7 Seed: Mound - Season: 10.58/Last 15: 10.05 = -.53 trend
#8 Seed Hopkins - Season: 10.34/Last 15: 10.96 = .62 trend
#9 Seed SLP - Season: 8.60/Last 15: 8.08 = -.52 trend
The data would indicate that Armstrong has made the most improvement followed by OMG and Hopkins. Wayzata is the best team in D3 even with their drop in measured performance of almost 1 point.
The Last 15 games would rank the teams as follows:
1. Wayzata 16.18
2. OMG 15.42
3. Armstrong 14.21
4. MPLS 13.30
5. Crow Rvr 12.98
6. Orono 11.12
7. Hopkins 10.96
8. Mound 10.05
9. SLP 8.08
If you looked at recent performance this sort would tell us that Mound should be playing in the Play In Game vs SLP instead of Hopkins.
As the teams enter into district tournament play there will be variables in play that probably did not exist (for most teams) in the regular season. Specifically, you will see the top goalies on the team getting more game time as well as the top players getting more ice time so simple logic would say that their is a chance the top teams will increase their output when their top players get more ice time.
I do not have the data done yet for the other districts so it may not be fair to say but on the surface it would look like D3 did not develop its teams at a rate they would like to have happen. My rationale for that statement is that only 3 teams have shown a positive trend in the Last 15 games (Armstrong, OMG and Hopkins) and everyone else went negative but Crow River was pretty close to being flat so I will say 3 up, 1 even and 5 down.
As for the comment of D3 dropping off big, I would conclude that the drop off is not as dramatic the phrase "drop off big time" would indicate when you look at the Last 15 game scores and compare them to the Season Rankings for all of the teams - 4 out of the 9 are in the top 30:
Wayzata would be 8
OMG 11
Armstrong 20
MPLS 28
CrowRvr 34
Orono 56
Hopkins 58
Mound 68
SLP 81
Best of luck to all the teams in districts!
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:43 pm
The strength of schedule over the last 15 games is going to be similar to the entire season due to the sampling of 15 games being a big enough number of games. So, the trend should be pretty accurate as to how teams have performed the last 15 games versus the entire season.Concerned Hockey Coach wrote:Interesting take... doesn't the strength of schedule influence trends though? Are you sure you're not punishing a team for who they have played? That is my largest beef with myhockeyrankings, I don't buy the "you should have beaten a team by 3/4 goals" since not all teams are structured or play to win by the level that myhockey says you should.mnhockeyperson wrote:This is interesting so I thought I would look into D3 performance from their Entire Year statistics versus the Last 15 games. I used MYHOCKEYRANKINGS data for this comparison:Concerned Hockey Coach wrote: I presume that they had to keep the extra berth in the South Regional, which just happens to be the weakest this year. It rotates so its hard to protest too much. Tough when there's 8 regional spots for 3 districts... one always gets 2 and there's on way to rotate the regionals without two weak districts occasionally getting in one regional.
D3 may not have the top end teams that D6 has, but I think its a stretch to say that there's a fall off after Wayzata and OMG. Mpls Park, Crow River and Armstrong will all compete for the final spot. Mpls Park beat OMG and has tied Wayzata, while Crow River went 1-1 with Mpls Park and Armstrong just tied Mpls Park or OMG I believe and lost to Wayzata by a goal.
#1 Seed: Wayzata - Season: 17.13/Last15: 16.18 = -.95 trend in performance
#2 Seed: OMG - Season: 14.80/Last15: 15.42 = .62 trend
#3 Seed: MPLS - Season: 13.41/Last15: 13.30 = -.11 trend
#4 Seed: Armstrong - Season: 13.22/Last15: 14.21 = .99 trend
#5 Seed: CrowRvr - Season: 13.04/Last15: 12.98 = -.06 trend
#6 Seed: Orono - Season: 11.53/Last15: 11.12 = -.41 trend
#7 Seed: Mound - Season: 10.58/Last 15: 10.05 = -.53 trend
#8 Seed Hopkins - Season: 10.34/Last 15: 10.96 = .62 trend
#9 Seed SLP - Season: 8.60/Last 15: 8.08 = -.52 trend
The data would indicate that Armstrong has made the most improvement followed by OMG and Hopkins. Wayzata is the best team in D3 even with their drop in measured performance of almost 1 point.
The Last 15 games would rank the teams as follows:
1. Wayzata 16.18
2. OMG 15.42
3. Armstrong 14.21
4. MPLS 13.30
5. Crow Rvr 12.98
6. Orono 11.12
7. Hopkins 10.96
8. Mound 10.05
9. SLP 8.08
If you looked at recent performance this sort would tell us that Mound should be playing in the Play In Game vs SLP instead of Hopkins.
As the teams enter into district tournament play there will be variables in play that probably did not exist (for most teams) in the regular season. Specifically, you will see the top goalies on the team getting more game time as well as the top players getting more ice time so simple logic would say that their is a chance the top teams will increase their output when their top players get more ice time.
I do not have the data done yet for the other districts so it may not be fair to say but on the surface it would look like D3 did not develop its teams at a rate they would like to have happen. My rationale for that statement is that only 3 teams have shown a positive trend in the Last 15 games (Armstrong, OMG and Hopkins) and everyone else went negative but Crow River was pretty close to being flat so I will say 3 up, 1 even and 5 down.
As for the comment of D3 dropping off big, I would conclude that the drop off is not as dramatic the phrase "drop off big time" would indicate when you look at the Last 15 game scores and compare them to the Season Rankings for all of the teams - 4 out of the 9 are in the top 30:
Wayzata would be 8
OMG 11
Armstrong 20
MPLS 28
CrowRvr 34
Orono 56
Hopkins 58
Mound 68
SLP 81
Best of luck to all the teams in districts!
All of this assumes My Hockey Rankings did not change any of their variables midway through the season and my assumption regarding the strength of schedule for the 15 games is very close to the entire season.
-
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:36 am
I like the mnhockey rankings methodology... and I agree that the current top 20 on there may not be the best reflection of the actual "top 20" teams because some are trending down, etc.mnhockeyperson wrote:
The strength of schedule over the last 15 games is going to be similar to the entire season due to the sampling of 15 games being a big enough number of games. So, the trend should be pretty accurate as to how teams have performed the last 15 games versus the entire season.
All of this assumes My Hockey Rankings did not change any of their variables midway through the season and my assumption regarding the strength of schedule for the 15 games is very close to the entire season.
BUT if a team doesn't play top notch competition in the final 15 games and doesn't beat the teams they are playing by sufficient goals to please the rankings, the "trends" may not be accurate.
District 8
This thread is suppose to be about District 8 can't district 3 teams create their own thread?
District 8 first round "A" Pee Wee's.
Hastings 6 over IGH/SSP 0
Lakeville North 6 over Johnson/Como 3
Anyone know the next games score:
Eagan VS Sibley
Apple Valley VS Eastview
District 8 first round "A" Pee Wee's.
Hastings 6 over IGH/SSP 0
Lakeville North 6 over Johnson/Como 3
Anyone know the next games score:
Eagan VS Sibley
Apple Valley VS Eastview
Re: District 8
Eastview and Sibley won, not sure scores.iseepalms wrote:This thread is suppose to be about District 8 can't district 3 teams create their own thread?
District 8 first round "A" Pee Wee's.
Hastings 6 over IGH/SSP 0
Lakeville North 6 over Johnson/Como 3
Anyone know the next games score:
Eagan VS Sibley
Apple Valley VS Eastview