Hockey Day Minnesota 2012

Older Topics, Not the current discussion

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)

BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

rapidsrapids wrote:According to official schedules:

10:00 Grand Rapids vs. White Bear Lake
12:30 Duluth East vs. Minnetonka

Karl posted East's schedule already and Grand Rapids schedule was just posted on grthunderhawks.com under the activities calendar section.
I sure hope this is an error. WBL was already on Hockey Day 3 or 4 years ago, and they lost 95% of their scoring from last year. :roll:
TheHockeyDJ
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:41 am
Location: Orange County, California
Contact:

Post by TheHockeyDJ »

Not an error. That is the official schedule. I would have rather seen someone else besides WBL myself, like Burnsville or Apple Valley, but I'm just happy Grand Rapids is in it this year, and also Grand Rapids is a front runner to host hockey day in 2013.
MNpuckfanatic77
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:58 pm

Post by MNpuckfanatic77 »

rapidsrapids wrote:According to official schedules:

10:00 Grand Rapids vs. White Bear Lake
12:30 Duluth East vs. Minnetonka

Karl posted East's schedule already and Grand Rapids schedule was just posted on grthunderhawks.com under the activities calendar section.
If this were the case, then it would already be announced. They are not repeating a team for the millionth time. White Bear was just another rumored team. The final teams will not be announced for a few weeks. The only 2 you can count on is Duluth East and Minnetonka.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

rapidsrapids wrote:Not an error. That is the official schedule. I would have rather seen someone else besides WBL myself, like Burnsville or Apple Valley, but I'm just happy Grand Rapids is in it this year, and also Grand Rapids is a front runner to host hockey day in 2013.
I doesn't make sense that they would have Grand Rapids in it this year, and also host it next year. Who would want to see the same team two consecutive years?
MNpuckfanatic77
Posts: 51
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 4:58 pm

Post by MNpuckfanatic77 »

The thread should almost be discontinued until its announced officially because I can already tell you 90% of the posts here are rumors. I'll say it again, Duluth East and Minnetonka are the only 2 that are officially decided as of right now. Thats the fact.
TheHockeyDJ
Posts: 2245
Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:41 am
Location: Orange County, California
Contact:

Post by TheHockeyDJ »

So, you are saying that an official schedule from Grand Rapids Athletic Director Pat Rendle is a rumor? www.grhshockey.com will have the schedule up today. It's already on ironrangeconference.org.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

This should get interesting!!!
EHSHack
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:09 pm

Post by EHSHack »

Offical lineups are WBL vs Rapids and Minnetonka vs East
Go Hounds.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

Section7, and the SEC well represented!!
flatontheice
Posts: 883
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 1:48 pm

Re: HockeyMN day

Post by flatontheice »

blueblood wrote:No Class A? Varsity teams only... 8)
Coming from a guy from community (Minnetonka) that hasn't won anything in boys athletics in my lifetime, thats a funny comment. :oops: :oops: :oops:

OOOO...touch me...I'm on fire... :roll:
interestedbystander
Posts: 87
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2010 9:25 am

Re: HockeyMN day

Post by interestedbystander »

flatontheice wrote:
blueblood wrote:No Class A? Varsity teams only... 8)
Coming from a guy from community (Minnetonka) that hasn't won anything in boys athletics in my lifetime, thats a funny comment. :oops: :oops: :oops:

OOOO...touch me...I'm on fire... :roll:
:idea: They have a pretty good Jr Gold team :lol:
BBB
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm

Post by BBB »

Let's see some teams that we don't usually see.
Brainerd vs River Lakes
Austin vs new ulm
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by PuckU126 »

BBB wrote:Let's see some teams that we don't usually see.
Brainerd vs River Lakes
Austin vs new ulm
I mean no offense, but the TV ratings will go down with that line up.

8)
The Puck
LGW
EHSHack
Posts: 717
Joined: Fri Dec 19, 2008 10:09 pm

Post by EHSHack »

So will the talent...
Go Hounds.
old goalie85
Posts: 3696
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm

Post by old goalie85 »

So would the state wide interest level.
fivehole628
Posts: 1307
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:56 pm

Post by fivehole628 »

interestedbystander wrote:No Class A teams?
Well that's too bad... would be nice to see a small single A school get a chance to play on the big stage.
Gopher Blog
Posts: 1548
Joined: Sat Jul 29, 2006 10:14 am
Contact:

Post by Gopher Blog »

BBB wrote:Let's see some teams that we don't usually see.
Brainerd vs River Lakes
Austin vs new ulm
The ratings for that would be like John Blutarsky's grade point average in "Animal House".
mulefarm
Posts: 1675
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 10:01 pm

Post by mulefarm »

fivehole628 wrote:
interestedbystander wrote:No Class A teams?
Well that's too bad... would be nice to see a small single A school get a chance to play on the big stage.
I believe Roseau played in it a couple of years ago.
blueblood
Posts: 2628
Joined: Fri May 26, 2006 8:36 am

Class A

Post by blueblood »

Roseau is not Class A mulefarm...
PuckU126
Posts: 3769
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 9:52 pm
Location: Minnesota
Contact:

Post by PuckU126 »

mulefarm wrote:
fivehole628 wrote:
interestedbystander wrote:No Class A teams?
Well that's too bad... would be nice to see a small single A school get a chance to play on the big stage.
I believe Roseau played in it a couple of years ago.
blueblood wrote:Roseau is not Class A mulefarm...
Plus Roseau played Wayzata in it last year.

8)
The Puck
LGW
MNHockeyFan
Posts: 7260
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:28 pm

Post by MNHockeyFan »

Just a thought, it would be kind of fun if they established a new tradition. Each year they would have the Class A champion play the AA champion from the year before.
BBB
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm

Post by BBB »

Coming from a guy from community (Minnetonka) that hasn't won anything in boys athletics in my lifetime, thats a funny comment. Embarassed Embarassed Embarassed

OOOO...touch me...I'm on fire... Rolling Eyes
I am not sure how old you are so I can say what your lifetime is but as far as boys athletics go Minnetonka won the state football title about 6 years ago and has won the boys basketball, golf, and lacrosse titles in the last few years. I think they are usually good in baseball and all the less popular sports but I don't know if they have won anything in those. Unfortunately, the affluence in the community along with 3 rinks hasn't led to a state hockey title.
BodyShots
Posts: 1921
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 9:44 am

Post by BodyShots »

fivehole628 wrote:
interestedbystander wrote:No Class A teams?
Well that's too bad... would be nice to see a small single A school get a chance to play on the big stage.
They do every year. It's called the JV state tournament! :lol:
BBB
Posts: 200
Joined: Mon Mar 09, 2009 2:20 pm

Post by BBB »

Instead of a AA vs A champion, lets have the 7th seeds play and the 8th seeds play. That way when Moorhead would have beat Alex 10-0 and Lakeville beat New Ulm 10-0 it would quiet the guys who think A hockey is any good and even the oddball on here last year saying the A tourney was as deep as the AA.
Goldy Gopher
Posts: 2475
Joined: Sat Dec 23, 2006 1:41 pm
Location: Miami, FL

Post by Goldy Gopher »

BBB wrote:Instead of a AA vs A champion, lets have the 7th seeds play and the 8th seeds play. That way when Moorhead would have beat Alex 10-0 and Lakeville beat New Ulm 10-0 it would quiet the guys who think A hockey is any good and even the oddball on here last year saying the A tourney was as deep as the AA.
:roll:

Last time I checked they only seed the top 4. Hmm, I must have missed something. ](*,)
The U invented swagger.
Post Reply