YouthHockeyHub.com Rankings (12-12-11)
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm
YouthHockeyHub.com Rankings (12-12-11)
This week's rankings are now live on the site (a new #1 at PWA)
http://youthhockeyhub.com/
Let the banter begin
http://youthhockeyhub.com/
Let the banter begin
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:05 pm
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm
There were a couple errors to the original posting to the U14's and SQA's that are now fixed. Yes, Andover is a Top 10 team at SQA.This is nuts! wrote:Andover Squirts knocked out of the top ten? They are a solid team. Not sure how they match up with the south metro?
Are you guys playing in the EP Tourney this weekend? The top teams will be revealed in SQA by next Sunday (lotsa top 10's going head to head).
-
- Posts: 4090
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 9:32 pm
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:05 pm
I m not an Andover guy. Have just seen them play a few times. They have a solid team with good goaltending. not sure how they match up with some of those other teams.YouthHockeyHub wrote:There were a couple errors to the original posting to the U14's and SQA's that are now fixed. Yes, Andover is a Top 10 team at SQA.This is nuts! wrote:Andover Squirts knocked out of the top ten? They are a solid team. Not sure how they match up with the south metro?
Are you guys playing in the EP Tourney this weekend? The top teams will be revea led in SQA by next Sunday (lotsa top 10's going head to head).
-
- Posts: 168
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 4:05 pm
-
- Posts: 48
- Joined: Tue Nov 23, 2010 2:40 pm
Re: YouthHockeyHub.com Rankings (12-12-11)
Save the banter for the PWA! We need "Scorekeeper" to break the Bantam A Top 10 down!!YouthHockeyHub wrote:This week's rankings are now live on the site (a new #1 at PWA)
http://youthhockeyhub.com/
Let the banter begin
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm
Mike,
As our site grows we may consider adding teams 11-20 at some levels.
We polled some of our rankers recently and all of them felt that adding 11-20 was a waste of time. One said, that "11-20 diminishes the value of Top Ten, keep it 1-10...plus I can't imagine knowing that many teams..."
On the other hand opening it up to 11-20 opens up more readers and teams coming to our site.
Stay tuned, Mike. Thanks for your interest.
TS
As our site grows we may consider adding teams 11-20 at some levels.
We polled some of our rankers recently and all of them felt that adding 11-20 was a waste of time. One said, that "11-20 diminishes the value of Top Ten, keep it 1-10...plus I can't imagine knowing that many teams..."
On the other hand opening it up to 11-20 opens up more readers and teams coming to our site.
Stay tuned, Mike. Thanks for your interest.
TS
I'm not against 11-20 ranking, but those teams are historically the teams that all beat each other on any given night. Even the 7, 8, 9, 10 ranked teams usually are in the same class. Keep the rankings coming.YouthHockeyHub wrote:Mike,
As our site grows we may consider adding teams 11-20 at some levels.
We polled some of our rankers recently and all of them felt that adding 11-20 was a waste of time. One said, that "11-20 diminishes the value of Top Ten, keep it 1-10...plus I can't imagine knowing that many teams..."
On the other hand opening it up to 11-20 opens up more readers and teams coming to our site.
Stay tuned, Mike. Thanks for your interest.
TS
-
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm