For more: http://www.mnhockeyhub.com/news_article ... r_id=32770
Congrats to both coaches.

Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach.
I believe I heard the Channel 45 announcers mentioned that Pauly suspended Quale for six games earlier in the season for an unspecified infraction. They gave the distinct impression that this was a more severe punishment than what may have been required under MSHSL rules.Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything.
Dylan Parker from Duluth East sat out five games for a similar issue.MNHockeyFan wrote:
I believe I heard the Channel 45 announcers mentioned that Pauly suspended Quale for six games earlier in the season for an unspecified infraction. They gave the distinct impression that this was a more severe punishment than what may have been required under MSHSL rules.
Glad to see your green is showing just in time for St. Patty's Day.Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach. Just look at the way his players act on the ice. They have no discipline and continuously disrespect the refs and opponents. He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything. The team's skill overtook Pauly's coaching this year.
Well actually this was the minimum punishment because this was Q's second violation.MNHockeyFan wrote:Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach.
Obviously you don't hold sway over all the coaches in the Minnesota Hockey Coaches Association who felt differently.
I believe I heard the Channel 45 announcers mentioned that Pauly suspended Quale for six games earlier in the season for an unspecified infraction. They gave the distinct impression that this was a more severe punishment than what may have been required under MSHSL rules.Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything.
Oh you must be the one that knows all and sees all.Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach. Just look at the way his players act on the ice. They have no discipline and continuously disrespect the refs and opponents. He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything. The team's skill overtook Pauly's coaching this year.
big words coming from the 1 seed that lost to Lakevilleeast hockey wrote:Or in this case, Hill-Murray.sachishi4 wrote:you have to beat the best to be the bestEast Side Pioneer Guy wrote:The standard has been set: If you want to be AA Coach Of The Year you have knock H-M out of contention for the State Championship.
Lee
Bill Lechner should have been AA coach of the year. Reason being, he took a team with one returning D and a young squad all together and coached them to the championship game and shockedOldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach. Just look at the way his players act on the ice. They have no discipline and continuously disrespect the refs and opponents. He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything. The team's skill overtook Pauly's coaching this year.
Any coach of Hill Murray, BSM, St Thomas, etc should rarily be considered for coach of the year. They are handed the top players in the state and are expected not to mess things up too much. BSM's unique situation this year does give credence to Pauly's nomination.Gems wrote:Bill Lechner should have been AA coach of the year. Reason being, he took a team with one returning D and a young squad all together and coached them to the championship game and shocked :shock: a lot of people, including me...Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach. Just look at the way his players act on the ice. They have no discipline and continuously disrespect the refs and opponents. He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything. The team's skill overtook Pauly's coaching this year.
The MSHSL doesn't give this award, the Hockey Coaches Association does.1parent wrote:Nothing against either coach as I'm sure they are great coaches and great people. MSHSL stresses it's not about winning to the HS coaches but then time after time they give the coach of the year award to the coaches that have great success in the win lose catagory.
Of which Pauly is the president. Do I hear ballot stuffing? Floridagate II:lol:longrebound wrote:The MSHSL doesn't give this award, the Hockey Coaches Association does.1parent wrote:Nothing against either coach as I'm sure they are great coaches and great people. MSHSL stresses it's not about winning to the HS coaches but then time after time they give the coach of the year award to the coaches that have great success in the win lose catagory.
I agree 100% with you. That squad was a mess the first coule of weeks with 2 F's playing D and they had been decimated by people leaving one way or another. Lechner found the perfect balance with those two lines, juggling things before settling on Willie Brown (Soph) playing with Juniors Guentzel an Lavalle on the top line and putting the two Sampairs together on the second line. But D was the big story as even Lou Nanne at state called them underrated and that again is a goup that started as 1 returning guy in Blake Heinrich.....what really did the BSM coach do? Get 6-7 division 1 players to play together?Gems wrote:Bill Lechner should have been AA coach of the year. Reason being, he took a team with one returning D and a young squad all together and coached them to the championship game and shocked :shock: a lot of people, including me...Oldtimehockeyguy23 wrote:This is ridiculous.. Pauly is a horrible coach. Just look at the way his players act on the ice. They have no discipline and continuously disrespect the refs and opponents. He doesn't hold his players accountable for anything. The team's skill overtook Pauly's coaching this year.
These comments are made yearly and others similar. I don't want to say they are incorrect (as the premise isn't), but in general, how many teams win with bad players?Goalie-Dad wrote:Any coach of Hill Murray, BSM, St Thomas, etc should rarily be considered for coach of the year. They are handed the top players in the state and are expected not to mess things up too much. BSM's unique situation this year does give credence to Pauly's nomination.
Obviously the majority of Pauly's coaching peers disagree with you. Not many of the "experts" gave BSM much of a chance to win their section, much less State. And naturally, many of the same "experts" now say the team was loaded with talent, so no wonder they won, and coaching had very little to do with their success.Wallyworld wrote:....what really did the BSM coach do? Get 6-7 division 1 players to play together?