Freddie knocks out his final 14 players. There will be a few disappointed kids (and probably a ton more disappointed dads) that they didn't make the list.
Enjoy,
http://youthhockeyhub.com/top-50-pwa-players-final-day/
Stay tuned next week, Freddie names his POY.
Top 50 PWA Players (Final Day)
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
What a joke
This proves it Freddie (Albert Lea) you have issues with Rochester and he has a vendetta against of them, he posts his spin on his hatred of that Program...NO KIDS in the top 50 from a top 13 team (that is laughable) Its a shame you cant overlook your Hatred and post honest opinions for Quality kids........You have lost all credibility on your knowledge of the Pee wee Hockey......Pleas go back to your hole in Albert Lea......
-
FireChoice
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:48 pm
Real list
Stratal....right on. You are correct. We saw your team and you easily have a couple top 50 players. We have one that is easily a top 15, and he was left off too. Congrats to the kids on this list. But remember, it's Freddies list. Freddie proves here that his cowboy hat is too tight.
Thanks to Frederick for taking time to recognize some good players. I agree with several players that I'm familiar with, and I found the snippets on others fun to read.
Stratal and Fire-- take the time to list your own top 50. I'd enjoy reading about some other good players to watch.
These lists are just for entertainment. Nothing to get worked up about.
Stratal and Fire-- take the time to list your own top 50. I'd enjoy reading about some other good players to watch.
These lists are just for entertainment. Nothing to get worked up about.
Re: Top 50 PWA Players (Final Day)
Nice overall list, hard to argue any different only seeing a fraction of what you have seen. Of course some missing but a good list. I think most could guess player of the year = KF.YouthHockeyHub wrote:Freddie knocks out his final 14 players. There will be a few disappointed kids (and probably a ton more disappointed dads) that they didn't make the list.
Enjoy,
http://youthhockeyhub.com/top-50-pwa-players-final-day/
Stay tuned next week, Freddie names his POY.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Re: What a joke
Stratal wrote:This proves it Freddie (Albert Lea) you have issues with Rochester and he has a vendetta against of them, he posts his spin on his hatred of that Program...NO KIDS in the top 50 from a top 13 team (that is laughable) Its a shame you cant overlook your Hatred and post honest opinions for Quality kids........You have lost all credibility on your knowledge of the Pee wee Hockey......Pleas go back to your hole in Albert Lea......
My kid's not on there either. Words can't express. Farging Bastage.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
Re: Real list
FireChoice wrote:Stratal....right on. You are correct. We saw your team and you easily have a couple top 50 players. We have one that is easily a top 15, and he was left off too. Congrats to the kids on this list. But remember, it's Freddies list. Freddie proves here that his cowboy hat is too tight.
It's one persons opinion, not a combination of votes like an all-state team or something. Is it possible the kids didn't shine in the particular game Freddy watched? Does a strong team necessarily mean they also have to have a great player, or by not having the great player yet still being highly ranked, does that maybe indicate there is a good deep "team" of "nice" players that is well coached?
-
OnFrozenPond
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2004 9:48 am
Re: Real list
The title of the article "Top 50 PWA Players" makes it seem so definitive. Maybe if it were titled "50 PWA players I enjoyed watching in 2011/2012" it wouldn't cause such a stir with high strung parents.snyper12 wrote:FireChoice wrote:Stratal....right on. You are correct. We saw your team and you easily have a couple top 50 players. We have one that is easily a top 15, and he was left off too. Congrats to the kids on this list. But remember, it's Freddies list. Freddie proves here that his cowboy hat is too tight.
It's one persons opinion, not a combination of votes like an all-state team or something. Is it possible the kids didn't shine in the particular game Freddy watched? Does a strong team necessarily mean they also have to have a great player, or by not having the great player yet still being highly ranked, does that maybe indicate there is a good deep "team" of "nice" players that is well coached?
Re: Real list
OnFrozenPond wrote:The title of the article "Top 50 PWA Players" makes it seem so definitive. Maybe if it were titled "50 PWA players I enjoyed watching in 2011/2012" it wouldn't cause such a stir with high strung parents.snyper12 wrote:FireChoice wrote:Stratal....right on. You are correct. We saw your team and you easily have a couple top 50 players. We have one that is easily a top 15, and he was left off too. Congrats to the kids on this list. But remember, it's Freddies list. Freddie proves here that his cowboy hat is too tight.
It's one persons opinion, not a combination of votes like an all-state team or something. Is it possible the kids didn't shine in the particular game Freddy watched? Does a strong team necessarily mean they also have to have a great player, or by not having the great player yet still being highly ranked, does that maybe indicate there is a good deep "team" of "nice" players that is well coached?
I can certainly buy that.
Get a clue..Your missing the point
First off It doesn't have anything to do with My Kid not being on the list (he didn't deserve it)
Congrats to all the kids which did make the list.
What it does have to do with is How someone could be so ARROGANT and Biased (Fredrick) to tout themselves as all knowing and say they are the best 50 players at the Pee Wee level (and people believe it).
The one gentlemen that said Top 50 players that Fredrick liked is more like it
What I have issue with is someone touting they know all and OMIT kids because of a issue with a certain Organization, That not writing.
And for shame for Hockey Hub for giving this person a platform to spew his Biased Agenda way to set yourself apart as a hockey forum and who prided itself in setting the bar at the highest level.....For Shame Tony Scott
Congrats to all the kids which did make the list.
What it does have to do with is How someone could be so ARROGANT and Biased (Fredrick) to tout themselves as all knowing and say they are the best 50 players at the Pee Wee level (and people believe it).
The one gentlemen that said Top 50 players that Fredrick liked is more like it
What I have issue with is someone touting they know all and OMIT kids because of a issue with a certain Organization, That not writing.
And for shame for Hockey Hub for giving this person a platform to spew his Biased Agenda way to set yourself apart as a hockey forum and who prided itself in setting the bar at the highest level.....For Shame Tony Scott
-
hockeygoof1
- Posts: 104
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 12:22 pm
- Location: St. Paul
a-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
helightsthelamp
- Posts: 217
- Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:21 pm
Re: Get a clue..Your missing the point
Freddie does a great job....at the end of the day, yes it is one person's opinion....Until you start putting the time in that Freddie does, yours is just a more uninformed opinion...There are MANY kids that could have been included on this list, that does not mean this is not a great list and take it for what it's worth.... Relax and enjoy... Thanks Freddie for your work and Congrats to all the kids on the list!!!Stratal wrote:First off It doesn't have anything to do with My Kid not being on the list (he didn't deserve it)
Congrats to all the kids which did make the list.
What it does have to do with is How someone could be so ARROGANT and Biased (Fredrick) to tout themselves as all knowing and say they are the best 50 players at the Pee Wee level (and people believe it).
The one gentlemen that said Top 50 players that Fredrick liked is more like it
What I have issue with is someone touting they know all and OMIT kids because of a issue with a certain Organization, That not writing.
And for shame for Hockey Hub for giving this person a platform to spew his Biased Agenda way to set yourself apart as a hockey forum and who prided itself in setting the bar at the highest level.....For Shame Tony Scott
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm
-
Monsterbuck1
- Posts: 57
- Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2011 9:39 pm
Congratulations to Stillwater and Centennial for reaching the top 10 and not having a single top player on their respective teams. Must be great coaching and/or great depth. Also among top teams with no mentions from Freddie are STMA, Roch, LVN, Woodbury and Roseau. We still love your passion for youth hockey Freddie. 
STMA represented.Monsterbuck1 wrote:Congratulations to Stillwater and Centennial for reaching the top 10 and not having a single top player on their respective teams. Must be great coaching and/or great depth. Also among top teams with no mentions from Freddie are STMA, Roch, LVN, Woodbury and Roseau. We still love your passion for youth hockey Freddie.
-
YouthHockeyHub
- Posts: 1109
- Joined: Mon Nov 28, 2011 12:20 pm
I'll say this as a blanket statement. YHH is honored to have Freddie write for us. He represents what is great about hockey in Minnesota.
Is he perfect? No.
Credibility is something we shoot for in each post and ranking we make. This past year we made 200 posts. Only three caused a stir (Fargo Seedings with the Fargo Selection Committee, a Jack Jablonski editorial we published, and the Top 50 PWAs)...the other 197 got very little feedback.
Our editorial goal is to be the voice of MN Youth Hockey. In other words, say what people are saying at the rink but don't have the time or forum to say it themselves. A day during the season did not pass without someone saying, "Tony, you should write about this topic...."
Ultimately, we try to hit that goal with each post and do it in a way that is both light hearted and positive. We do not want the site to become the Jerry Springer Show.
Is he perfect? No.
Credibility is something we shoot for in each post and ranking we make. This past year we made 200 posts. Only three caused a stir (Fargo Seedings with the Fargo Selection Committee, a Jack Jablonski editorial we published, and the Top 50 PWAs)...the other 197 got very little feedback.
Our editorial goal is to be the voice of MN Youth Hockey. In other words, say what people are saying at the rink but don't have the time or forum to say it themselves. A day during the season did not pass without someone saying, "Tony, you should write about this topic...."
Ultimately, we try to hit that goal with each post and do it in a way that is both light hearted and positive. We do not want the site to become the Jerry Springer Show.
-
OGEE OGELTHORPE
- Posts: 703
- Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 9:44 pm
- Location: State of shock/without the awe
-
toeslapper
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:21 pm
This is laughable. To have 4 girls on this list. not one of the girls was in the top 8 on there team.
Lets just call it what it is. Top 50 photo's Freddie had.
P.S. Questions for Freddie. What is your hockey backround? Did you play? Where did you play? Did you coach? What Level?
Odds are Freddie won't answer any of these.
Lets just call it what it is. Top 50 photo's Freddie had.
P.S. Questions for Freddie. What is your hockey backround? Did you play? Where did you play? Did you coach? What Level?
Odds are Freddie won't answer any of these.
-
old goalie85
- Posts: 3696
- Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2009 6:37 pm