Section 8AA
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
-
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:41 am
- Location: Orange County, California
- Contact:
Section 8AA
With Brainerd's big upset win @ Moorhead on Thursday, what do you Northwesterners think this section is looking like right now? Where is the Shady Bucnh? I'm hoping Roseau or Brainerd come out of this section, no disrespect to Moorhead, but just want a change of pace down in St. Paul.
YouTube.com/BarbellMedicine
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
really
Did you really just post a listing of teams by winning percentage. Does that even really mean anything. Percentage only means something if all the teams play 90% of their games against only their section. Also if the strength of schedule is similar. And those things hardly ever happen in high school hockey. Try ranking by something meaningful.
-
- Posts: 2245
- Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:41 am
- Location: Orange County, California
- Contact:
goaltending
When teams are even, it will come down to goaltending. The Section 8AA team that has the hot goalie come playoff time will produce the winner.
Spuds have generally had this factor come playoff time. Rams have a good one, but will need to prove he can win the game on his own. Should be interesting down the stretch!
Spuds have generally had this factor come playoff time. Rams have a good one, but will need to prove he can win the game on his own. Should be interesting down the stretch!
Winning the section? Yes.joris016 wrote:Saw Roseau play at Warroad and against Bemidji this past weekend and they are pretty damn good. Very good top line and big defensemen. I think they will end up winning the section and will be a big threat at the excel.
Big threat at the Xcel? No.
Their top five skaters are excellent, but it falls off a cliff after that. I have a hard time seeing them staying with Hill, Edina, East, Blaine, and the other teams that will likely be at the tourney.
Every year people say that section 8AA and the team that comes out of their likely doesn't stand a chance. Moorhead beat Eagan last year and almost beat State runner-up Hill-Murray. Roseau's size on defense will pose a threat to those teams. Fine, they might not make it to the championship but they will be tough to beat.
Re: really
grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Did you really just post a listing of teams by winning percentage. Does that even really mean anything. Percentage only means something if all the teams play 90% of their games against only their section. Also if the strength of schedule is similar. And those things hardly ever happen in high school hockey. Try ranking by something meaningful.
Uh, yes - I really posted a list strictly by winning percentage. That's what I said it was and that's what it was - too difficult to comprehend ? Schedule strength has nothing to do with that calculation - it is simply your overall won / lost record changed to a percentage. Your won / lost record is what it is, no matter whom / where / when you played.
Roseua 3 Blaine 3rainier wrote:Winning the section? Yes.joris016 wrote:Saw Roseau play at Warroad and against Bemidji this past weekend and they are pretty damn good. Very good top line and big defensemen. I think they will end up winning the section and will be a big threat at the excel.
Big threat at the Xcel? No.
Their top five skaters are excellent, but it falls off a cliff after that. I have a hard time seeing them staying with Hill, Edina, East, Blaine, and the other teams that will likely be at the tourney.
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
Win loss ranking
Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
Re: Win loss ranking
I think net weight of players is definitely a factor.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
Re: Win loss ranking
grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
Weight, huh ? BRILLIANT !
Where's Slapshooter when you need him ? Hey Elliott - wanna take care of my light work for me ?
Re: Win loss ranking
TTpuckster wrote:I think net weight of players is definitely a factor.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
I think the weight of the net is a factor.
Re: Win loss ranking
After that last post, I think SPUDNUT is Slappy in disguise.SPUDNUT wrote:I think the weight of the net is a factor.TTpuckster wrote:I think net weight of players is definitely a factor.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.

The Puck
LGW
LGW
-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
Re: Win loss ranking
Or factor is the net or weight?SPUDNUT wrote:TTpuckster wrote:I think net weight of players is definitely a factor.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
I think the weight of the net is a factor.

-
- Posts: 2783
- Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 8:26 am
- Location: State of Hockey
Re: Win loss ranking
PuckU126 wrote:After that last post, I think SPUDNUT is Slappy in disguise.SPUDNUT wrote:I think the weight of the net is a factor.TTpuckster wrote: I think net weight of players is definitely a factor.
If he were slappy, there would be like 10.000 emoticons or more.
Re: Win loss ranking
Poor Bemidji would be #160 or so. Thosae poor kids are small.SPUDNUT wrote:grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ranking teams by win loss means nothing.
You know that right? Might as well rank them
By net weight of all players or total gpa.
Weight, huh ? BRILLIANT !
Where's Slapshooter when you need him ? Hey Elliott - wanna take care of my light work for me ?
I herard Crookston Cathedral in 1972 or so had some real heavy weights.
On a hockey note, Bemdiji has 2 pretty good Goalies.
Unfortunately, limited scoring.
And now 2 second line forwards are injured and out for the season in all likelyhood. A starting D (and good scorer) is out indefinetly with an illness.
A down year gone down farther.
Bantam A (AA?) team is playing very well so there is a future.
And as said here, good tending could steal a game or two for them as they have played well (clse games) with all section foes.
Unfortunately, limited scoring.
And now 2 second line forwards are injured and out for the season in all likelyhood. A starting D (and good scorer) is out indefinetly with an illness.
A down year gone down farther.
Bantam A (AA?) team is playing very well so there is a future.
And as said here, good tending could steal a game or two for them as they have played well (clse games) with all section foes.
elliott70 wrote:On a hockey note, Bemdiji has 2 pretty good Goalies.
Unfortunately, limited scoring.
And now 2 second line forwards are injured and out for the season in all likelyhood. A starting D (and good scorer) is out indefinetly with an illness.
A down year gone down farther.
Bantam A (AA?) team is playing very well so there is a future.
And as said here, good tending could steal a game or two for them as they have played well (clse games) with all section foes.
Ouch - sounds like your season is gonna be about as exciting as ours. Oh well, there's always next year (?)
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 1970
- Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 11:43 am
- Location: Bemidji
-
- Posts: 186
- Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2007 6:38 pm
Previously State Champs
joris016 wrote:Saw Roseau play at Warroad and against Bemidji this past weekend and they are pretty damn good. Very good top line and big defensemen. I think they will end up winning the section and will be a big threat at the excel.
Who knows. The core of this team (primarily Juniors) did win both the VFW Bantam A State Championship 2 years ago as well as the Pee Wee A State Championship 4 years ago.