GMHF
Moderators: Mitch Hawker, east hockey, karl(east)
All he's responding with for the most part is "bump." As for replying to his own posts, maybe he's trying to get conversation started among viewers. It keeps the topics in view and of interest. I've been following the "champions tourney" idea and plan to continue. I see no issue with it.
And by the way, please include a "No" option in your voting options, thanks.
And by the way, please include a "No" option in your voting options, thanks.
-
- Posts: 726
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 11:23 pm
Re: GMHF
Ran it by Lee prior to ever starting the tourney idea. Sorry already checked with the head cheese prior to doing it.blueblood wrote:I am really getting bored with GMHF's postings on this board. He is the only one who repsonds to his own posts. Can we stop with the junk blogs please?
Re: GMHF
Guess Lee was so focused on the Hounds section final...that he wasn't paying attention...because this is one of the DUMBEST threads ever created on this Board...grandmeadowhockeyfan...playing in the traffic on I35 would have been a more productive use of you're time...than the time you spent...starting this thread.grandmeadowhockeyfan wrote:Ran it by Lee prior to ever starting the tourney idea. Sorry already checked with the head cheese prior to doing it.blueblood wrote:I am really getting bored with GMHF's postings on this board. He is the only one who repsonds to his own posts. Can we stop with the junk blogs please?
-
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 12:11 am
Agreed - This is a very time-consuming project that has proven to be interesting and informative. Why anyone would complain about it makes little sense, considering they do not have to participate in it or view the posts.GordonBombay99 wrote:Grand Meadow im a fan of what your doing, I find it very interesting and a good review of history, keep it up!
Nice work, Grand Meadow!